氢键与 RMSD:蛋白质折叠的几何反应坐标。

IF 3.1 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Y Kasprzak, J Rückert, N Ludolph, C G Hübner, H Paulsen
{"title":"氢键与 RMSD:蛋白质折叠的几何反应坐标。","authors":"Y Kasprzak, J Rückert, N Ludolph, C G Hübner, H Paulsen","doi":"10.1063/5.0241564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reaction coordinates are a useful tool that allows the complex dynamics of a protein in high-dimensional phase space to be projected onto a much simpler model with only a few degrees of freedom, while preserving the essential aspects of that dynamics. In this way, reaction coordinates could provide an intuitive, albeit simplified, understanding of the complex dynamics of proteins. Together with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, reaction coordinates can also be used to sample the phase space very efficiently and to calculate transition rates and paths between different metastable states. Unfortunately, ideal reaction coordinates for a system capable of these performances are not known a priori, and an efficient calculation in the course of an MD simulation is currently an active field of research. An alternative is to use geometric reaction coordinates, which, although generally unable to provide quantitative accuracy, are useful for simplified mechanistic models of protein dynamics and can thus help gain insights into the fundamental aspects of these dynamics. In this study, five such geometric reaction coordinates, such as the end-to-end distance, the radius of gyration, the solvent accessible surface area, the root-mean-square distance (RMSD), and the mean native hydrogen bond length, are compared. For this purpose, extensive molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for two peptides and a small protein in order to calculate and compare free energy profiles with the aid of the reaction coordinates mentioned. While none of the investigated geometrical reaction coordinates could be demonstrated to be an optimal reaction coordinate, the RMSD and the mean native hydrogen bond length appeared to perform more effectively than the other three reaction coordinates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":"162 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrogen bonds vs RMSD: Geometric reaction coordinates for protein folding.\",\"authors\":\"Y Kasprzak, J Rückert, N Ludolph, C G Hübner, H Paulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0241564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reaction coordinates are a useful tool that allows the complex dynamics of a protein in high-dimensional phase space to be projected onto a much simpler model with only a few degrees of freedom, while preserving the essential aspects of that dynamics. In this way, reaction coordinates could provide an intuitive, albeit simplified, understanding of the complex dynamics of proteins. Together with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, reaction coordinates can also be used to sample the phase space very efficiently and to calculate transition rates and paths between different metastable states. Unfortunately, ideal reaction coordinates for a system capable of these performances are not known a priori, and an efficient calculation in the course of an MD simulation is currently an active field of research. An alternative is to use geometric reaction coordinates, which, although generally unable to provide quantitative accuracy, are useful for simplified mechanistic models of protein dynamics and can thus help gain insights into the fundamental aspects of these dynamics. In this study, five such geometric reaction coordinates, such as the end-to-end distance, the radius of gyration, the solvent accessible surface area, the root-mean-square distance (RMSD), and the mean native hydrogen bond length, are compared. For this purpose, extensive molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for two peptides and a small protein in order to calculate and compare free energy profiles with the aid of the reaction coordinates mentioned. While none of the investigated geometrical reaction coordinates could be demonstrated to be an optimal reaction coordinate, the RMSD and the mean native hydrogen bond length appeared to perform more effectively than the other three reaction coordinates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":\"162 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0241564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrogen bonds vs RMSD: Geometric reaction coordinates for protein folding.

Reaction coordinates are a useful tool that allows the complex dynamics of a protein in high-dimensional phase space to be projected onto a much simpler model with only a few degrees of freedom, while preserving the essential aspects of that dynamics. In this way, reaction coordinates could provide an intuitive, albeit simplified, understanding of the complex dynamics of proteins. Together with molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, reaction coordinates can also be used to sample the phase space very efficiently and to calculate transition rates and paths between different metastable states. Unfortunately, ideal reaction coordinates for a system capable of these performances are not known a priori, and an efficient calculation in the course of an MD simulation is currently an active field of research. An alternative is to use geometric reaction coordinates, which, although generally unable to provide quantitative accuracy, are useful for simplified mechanistic models of protein dynamics and can thus help gain insights into the fundamental aspects of these dynamics. In this study, five such geometric reaction coordinates, such as the end-to-end distance, the radius of gyration, the solvent accessible surface area, the root-mean-square distance (RMSD), and the mean native hydrogen bond length, are compared. For this purpose, extensive molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for two peptides and a small protein in order to calculate and compare free energy profiles with the aid of the reaction coordinates mentioned. While none of the investigated geometrical reaction coordinates could be demonstrated to be an optimal reaction coordinate, the RMSD and the mean native hydrogen bond length appeared to perform more effectively than the other three reaction coordinates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Physics
Journal of Chemical Physics 物理-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.90%
发文量
1615
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance. Topical coverage includes: Theoretical Methods and Algorithms Advanced Experimental Techniques Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials Polymers and Soft Matter Biological Molecules and Networks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信