医疗保健专业人员在住院病房和自信社区治疗中实施以康复为导向的方法的经验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Issues in Mental Health Nursing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1080/01612840.2025.2456180
Kim Jørgensen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Mathias Søren Hansen, Morten Hansen, Rikke Juhl, Anna Bay Østergaard, Merete Bjerrum, Bengt Karlsson
{"title":"医疗保健专业人员在住院病房和自信社区治疗中实施以康复为导向的方法的经验。","authors":"Kim Jørgensen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Mathias Søren Hansen, Morten Hansen, Rikke Juhl, Anna Bay Østergaard, Merete Bjerrum, Bengt Karlsson","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2025.2456180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recovery-oriented approaches in mental health emphasize personal growth, agency, and meaningful community integration. While endorsed by policies and reforms, the practical implementation of such approaches remains challenging, particularly in settings like Denmark, where structural fragmentation, professional hierarchies, and resource constraints may limit the adoption of holistic recovery principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed focus group interviews with 21 health professionals from inpatient units and Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams in Danish mental health services. Using inductive content analysis, we examined participants' perceptions, understandings, and experiences in implementing personal recovery-oriented practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four categories emerged: (1) \"Creating New Control in Recovery\" highlighted the importance of personal agency and collaborative care involving patients, families, and community stakeholders; (2) \"Recovery-Oriented Practice within Professional Parameters\" underscored efforts to balance patient preferences with clinical responsibilities; (3) \"Barriers to Implementing Recovery-Oriented Practice\" revealed systemic constraints, resource limitations, and emotional strain on staff; and (4) \"Advocating for a Paradigm Shift towards Recovery-Oriented Approaches\" emphasized the desire for interprofessional collaboration, the inclusion of peer workers, and structural reforms.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate that while Danish health professionals recognize the value of personal recovery-oriented care, their capacity to realize this approach is constrained by organizational structures, professional hierarchies, and limited resources. Strengthening systemic support, enhancing interprofessional collaboration, and integrating peer expertise are critical to fostering more equitable, person-centered mental health services. These insights contribute to a nuanced understanding of recovery-oriented implementation in European contexts and may inform strategies that better support professionals and service users in achieving sustained, meaningful recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Professionals' Experience with the Implementation of a Recovery-Oriented Approach across in-Patient Units and Assertive Community Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Kim Jørgensen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Mathias Søren Hansen, Morten Hansen, Rikke Juhl, Anna Bay Østergaard, Merete Bjerrum, Bengt Karlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01612840.2025.2456180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recovery-oriented approaches in mental health emphasize personal growth, agency, and meaningful community integration. While endorsed by policies and reforms, the practical implementation of such approaches remains challenging, particularly in settings like Denmark, where structural fragmentation, professional hierarchies, and resource constraints may limit the adoption of holistic recovery principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study employed focus group interviews with 21 health professionals from inpatient units and Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams in Danish mental health services. Using inductive content analysis, we examined participants' perceptions, understandings, and experiences in implementing personal recovery-oriented practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four categories emerged: (1) \\\"Creating New Control in Recovery\\\" highlighted the importance of personal agency and collaborative care involving patients, families, and community stakeholders; (2) \\\"Recovery-Oriented Practice within Professional Parameters\\\" underscored efforts to balance patient preferences with clinical responsibilities; (3) \\\"Barriers to Implementing Recovery-Oriented Practice\\\" revealed systemic constraints, resource limitations, and emotional strain on staff; and (4) \\\"Advocating for a Paradigm Shift towards Recovery-Oriented Approaches\\\" emphasized the desire for interprofessional collaboration, the inclusion of peer workers, and structural reforms.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate that while Danish health professionals recognize the value of personal recovery-oriented care, their capacity to realize this approach is constrained by organizational structures, professional hierarchies, and limited resources. Strengthening systemic support, enhancing interprofessional collaboration, and integrating peer expertise are critical to fostering more equitable, person-centered mental health services. These insights contribute to a nuanced understanding of recovery-oriented implementation in European contexts and may inform strategies that better support professionals and service users in achieving sustained, meaningful recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2025.2456180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2025.2456180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:心理健康的康复导向方法强调个人成长、能动性和有意义的社区整合。虽然得到了政策和改革的支持,但这些方法的实际实施仍然具有挑战性,特别是在丹麦这样的环境中,结构分散、专业等级和资源限制可能限制采用整体恢复原则。方法:本定性研究采用焦点小组访谈的21名卫生专业人员来自住院单位和自信的社区治疗(ACT)团队在丹麦精神卫生服务。使用归纳内容分析,我们检查了参与者的看法,理解和经验,在实施个人康复为导向的做法。结果:出现了四个类别:(1)“在康复中创造新的控制”强调了个人代理和涉及患者、家庭和社区利益相关者的协作护理的重要性;(2) “专业参数内的康复导向实践”强调了平衡患者偏好与临床责任的努力;(3)“实施康复导向实践的障碍”揭示了系统约束、资源限制和员工的情绪紧张;和(4)“倡导向以复苏为导向的方法范式转变”强调了跨专业合作、同行工作者参与和结构改革的愿望。讨论/结论:研究结果表明,虽然丹麦卫生专业人员认识到以个人康复为导向的护理的价值,但他们实现这种方法的能力受到组织结构、专业等级和有限资源的限制。加强系统支持、加强专业间合作和整合同行专业知识对于促进更公平、以人为本的精神卫生服务至关重要。这些见解有助于细致入微地理解欧洲背景下以恢复为导向的实施,并可能为更好地支持专业人员和服务用户实现持续、有意义的恢复提供战略信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare Professionals' Experience with the Implementation of a Recovery-Oriented Approach across in-Patient Units and Assertive Community Treatment.

Introduction: Recovery-oriented approaches in mental health emphasize personal growth, agency, and meaningful community integration. While endorsed by policies and reforms, the practical implementation of such approaches remains challenging, particularly in settings like Denmark, where structural fragmentation, professional hierarchies, and resource constraints may limit the adoption of holistic recovery principles.

Methods: This qualitative study employed focus group interviews with 21 health professionals from inpatient units and Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams in Danish mental health services. Using inductive content analysis, we examined participants' perceptions, understandings, and experiences in implementing personal recovery-oriented practices.

Results: Four categories emerged: (1) "Creating New Control in Recovery" highlighted the importance of personal agency and collaborative care involving patients, families, and community stakeholders; (2) "Recovery-Oriented Practice within Professional Parameters" underscored efforts to balance patient preferences with clinical responsibilities; (3) "Barriers to Implementing Recovery-Oriented Practice" revealed systemic constraints, resource limitations, and emotional strain on staff; and (4) "Advocating for a Paradigm Shift towards Recovery-Oriented Approaches" emphasized the desire for interprofessional collaboration, the inclusion of peer workers, and structural reforms.

Discussion/conclusion: The findings demonstrate that while Danish health professionals recognize the value of personal recovery-oriented care, their capacity to realize this approach is constrained by organizational structures, professional hierarchies, and limited resources. Strengthening systemic support, enhancing interprofessional collaboration, and integrating peer expertise are critical to fostering more equitable, person-centered mental health services. These insights contribute to a nuanced understanding of recovery-oriented implementation in European contexts and may inform strategies that better support professionals and service users in achieving sustained, meaningful recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing NURSINGPSYCHIATRY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信