与男性和女性发生性行为的男性接受艾滋病毒暴露前预防的障碍:一项全球范围审查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
International Journal of STD & AIDS Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1177/09564624251321564
Jodie Crossman, Daniel Richardson
{"title":"与男性和女性发生性行为的男性接受艾滋病毒暴露前预防的障碍:一项全球范围审查。","authors":"Jodie Crossman, Daniel Richardson","doi":"10.1177/09564624251321564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough PrEP is a highly effective HIV prevention method, some groups are underrepresented in PrEP uptake. Much HIV prevention research groups gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men together; however, men who have sex with both men and women (MSWM) may have needs distinct from those who identify as exclusively gay. This scoping review aims to explore documented barriers to PrEP use among MSWM.MethodsLiterature was searched using four databases. Studies were included if data referring to MSWM were reported as a distinct category. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and findings were stratified into relevant categories of the social ecological framework.ResultsAlongside intersectional barriers, MSWM were found to have lower awareness of PrEP, and access sexual health services less than men who have sex only with men. Those who did not identify with the LGBT community often missed out on health promotion messages for this group and were less likely to be offered HIV prevention interventions. MSWM identified more stigmatisation around PrEP use than gay men. However, when aware of PrEP, MSWM were very motivated to use this intervention.ConclusionsNot all MSM will identify within the LGBTQ + community and may miss out on valuable opportunities for HIV prevention. PrEP information should be widely available in a variety of health and community settings. Health care professionals should avoid assumptions when assessing patients and provide information about HIV and STI prevention to all attending sexual health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":14408,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","volume":" ","pages":"450-468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake for men who have sex with both men and women: A global scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Jodie Crossman, Daniel Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09564624251321564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough PrEP is a highly effective HIV prevention method, some groups are underrepresented in PrEP uptake. Much HIV prevention research groups gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men together; however, men who have sex with both men and women (MSWM) may have needs distinct from those who identify as exclusively gay. This scoping review aims to explore documented barriers to PrEP use among MSWM.MethodsLiterature was searched using four databases. Studies were included if data referring to MSWM were reported as a distinct category. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and findings were stratified into relevant categories of the social ecological framework.ResultsAlongside intersectional barriers, MSWM were found to have lower awareness of PrEP, and access sexual health services less than men who have sex only with men. Those who did not identify with the LGBT community often missed out on health promotion messages for this group and were less likely to be offered HIV prevention interventions. MSWM identified more stigmatisation around PrEP use than gay men. However, when aware of PrEP, MSWM were very motivated to use this intervention.ConclusionsNot all MSM will identify within the LGBTQ + community and may miss out on valuable opportunities for HIV prevention. PrEP information should be widely available in a variety of health and community settings. Health care professionals should avoid assumptions when assessing patients and provide information about HIV and STI prevention to all attending sexual health services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"450-468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of STD & AIDS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251321564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of STD & AIDS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624251321564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然PrEP是一种非常有效的艾滋病毒预防方法,但一些群体在PrEP的使用中代表性不足。许多艾滋病预防研究小组将同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性聚集在一起;然而,同时与男性和女性发生性关系的男性(MSWM)的需求可能与那些自认为是纯同性恋的人不同。这一范围审查的目的是探讨在MSWM中使用PrEP的记录障碍。方法:采用4个数据库进行文献检索。如果将涉及MSWM的数据作为一个独特的类别报告,则纳入研究。使用标准化表格提取数据,并将结果分层到社会生态框架的相关类别中。结果:除了交叉障碍外,发现MSWM对PrEP的认识较低,并且获得性健康服务的人数少于只与男性发生性关系的男性。那些不认同LGBT群体的人往往错过了这个群体的健康促进信息,也不太可能得到艾滋病毒预防干预。与男同性恋相比,MSWM认为使用PrEP更容易受到歧视。然而,当意识到PrEP时,MSWM非常有动力使用这种干预措施。结论:并非所有的男同性恋者都会认同LGBTQ +社区,并可能错过预防艾滋病的宝贵机会。应在各种卫生和社区环境中广泛提供预防措施信息。卫生保健专业人员在评估病人时应避免假设,并向所有参加性健康服务的人提供有关艾滋病毒和性传播感染预防的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake for men who have sex with both men and women: A global scoping review.

BackgroundAlthough PrEP is a highly effective HIV prevention method, some groups are underrepresented in PrEP uptake. Much HIV prevention research groups gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men together; however, men who have sex with both men and women (MSWM) may have needs distinct from those who identify as exclusively gay. This scoping review aims to explore documented barriers to PrEP use among MSWM.MethodsLiterature was searched using four databases. Studies were included if data referring to MSWM were reported as a distinct category. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and findings were stratified into relevant categories of the social ecological framework.ResultsAlongside intersectional barriers, MSWM were found to have lower awareness of PrEP, and access sexual health services less than men who have sex only with men. Those who did not identify with the LGBT community often missed out on health promotion messages for this group and were less likely to be offered HIV prevention interventions. MSWM identified more stigmatisation around PrEP use than gay men. However, when aware of PrEP, MSWM were very motivated to use this intervention.ConclusionsNot all MSM will identify within the LGBTQ + community and may miss out on valuable opportunities for HIV prevention. PrEP information should be widely available in a variety of health and community settings. Health care professionals should avoid assumptions when assessing patients and provide information about HIV and STI prevention to all attending sexual health services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STD & AIDS provides a clinically oriented forum for investigating and treating sexually transmissible infections, HIV and AIDS. Publishing original research and practical papers, the journal contains in-depth review articles, short papers, case reports, audit reports, CPD papers and a lively correspondence column. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信