教育对接受下背部疼痛物理治疗的患者的影响:一项I级系统评价和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Luise Schäfer, Nicola Manocchio, Michela Bossa, Calogero Foti, Marcel Betsch, Joshua Kubach
{"title":"教育对接受下背部疼痛物理治疗的患者的影响:一项I级系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Luise Schäfer, Nicola Manocchio, Michela Bossa, Calogero Foti, Marcel Betsch, Joshua Kubach","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in modern society, with a lifetime incidence of up to 90%. According to most national and international guidelines, educational interventions play a central role in the multimodal treatment of LBP. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of educational interventions on pain and disability in patients with LBP undergoing physiotherapy compared to patients without educational interventions undergoing physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2024, a comprehensive computer-aided search was performed to assess the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria with an established PICOTD algorithm. Two authors independently performed the data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. The primary outcome measures extracted were a pain score (VAS or NRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 8152 patients were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.9 months, the mean length of symptom duration was 66.7 ± 51.6 months, and the mean age of the patients was 46.7 ± 9.2 years. Compared to physiotherapy alone, additional education did not reduce pain (P = 0.4) or disability according to the RMQ (P = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of education did not impact pain and disability in patients undergoing physiotherapy for chronic non-specific LPB.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Luise Schäfer, Nicola Manocchio, Michela Bossa, Calogero Foti, Marcel Betsch, Joshua Kubach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in modern society, with a lifetime incidence of up to 90%. According to most national and international guidelines, educational interventions play a central role in the multimodal treatment of LBP. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of educational interventions on pain and disability in patients with LBP undergoing physiotherapy compared to patients without educational interventions undergoing physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2024, a comprehensive computer-aided search was performed to assess the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria with an established PICOTD algorithm. Two authors independently performed the data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. The primary outcome measures extracted were a pain score (VAS or NRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 8152 patients were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.9 months, the mean length of symptom duration was 66.7 ± 51.6 months, and the mean age of the patients was 46.7 ± 9.2 years. Compared to physiotherapy alone, additional education did not reduce pain (P = 0.4) or disability according to the RMQ (P = 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of education did not impact pain and disability in patients undergoing physiotherapy for chronic non-specific LPB.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02788-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腰痛(LBP)是现代社会最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病之一,其终生发病率高达90%。根据大多数国家和国际指南,教育干预在腰痛的多模式治疗中起着核心作用。本系统综述和荟萃分析调查了教育干预对接受物理治疗的腰痛患者疼痛和残疾的影响,并与未接受教育干预的患者进行了物理治疗。方法:于2024年10月对PubMed、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar和Embase等在线数据库进行了全面的计算机辅助检索。搜索遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)标准,并采用已建立的PICOTD算法。两位作者独立进行了数据提取和偏倚风险评估。提取的主要结局指标是疼痛评分(VAS或NRS)和Roland Morris残疾问卷(RMQ)。结果:从8152例患者中检索数据。平均随访时间6.2±3.9个月,平均症状持续时间66.7±51.6个月,患者平均年龄46.7±9.2岁。根据RMQ (P = 0.9),与单独物理治疗相比,额外的教育并没有减轻疼痛(P = 0.4)或残疾(P = 0.9)。结论:教育的增加对慢性非特异性LPB患者接受物理治疗的疼痛和残疾没有影响。证据等级:一级,随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of education in patients undergoing physiotherapy for lower back pain: a level I systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Lower back pain (LBP) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in modern society, with a lifetime incidence of up to 90%. According to most national and international guidelines, educational interventions play a central role in the multimodal treatment of LBP. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the impact of educational interventions on pain and disability in patients with LBP undergoing physiotherapy compared to patients without educational interventions undergoing physiotherapy.

Methods: In October 2024, a comprehensive computer-aided search was performed to assess the online databases PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria with an established PICOTD algorithm. Two authors independently performed the data extraction and risk of bias evaluation. The primary outcome measures extracted were a pain score (VAS or NRS) and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ).

Results: Data from 8152 patients were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 6.2 ± 3.9 months, the mean length of symptom duration was 66.7 ± 51.6 months, and the mean age of the patients was 46.7 ± 9.2 years. Compared to physiotherapy alone, additional education did not reduce pain (P = 0.4) or disability according to the RMQ (P = 0.9).

Conclusion: The addition of education did not impact pain and disability in patients undergoing physiotherapy for chronic non-specific LPB.

Level of evidence: Level I, systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信