Anthony E Bishay, Kristen L Williams, Nick De Oliviera, Samuel W Fitch, Eunyoung Hong, Scott L Zuckerman, Douglas P Terry
{"title":"用客观眼动追踪评价运动相关脑震荡。","authors":"Anthony E Bishay, Kristen L Williams, Nick De Oliviera, Samuel W Fitch, Eunyoung Hong, Scott L Zuckerman, Douglas P Terry","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2025.2465371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate EyeBOX in an adolescent sport-related concussion (SRC) population by comparing scores between concussed and non-concussed athletes, examining sensitivity/specificity, and assessing clinical recovery associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, unmatched case-control study examined concussed adolescents (11-22 years) treated in a sports concussion clinic who underwent EyeBOX testing. Concussed participants completed symptom scales and follow-up assessments. Analyses included t-tests comparing groups, sensitivity/specificity analyses, and models examining relationships between BOX scores and recovery outcomes, including initial post-concussion symptom severity (PCSS) scores, return to learn (RTL), symptom resolution (SR), and return to play (RTP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 36 youth athletes with SRCs and 30 non-concussed controls. BOX scores were significantly higher in concussed participants (7.9 ± 5.2) compared to controls (5.4 ± 5.1; <i>t</i> = 2.062, <i>p</i> = 0.043, Cohen's d = 0.479). Sensitivity for detecting concussion ranged from 22% (BOX<u>></u>10) to 61% (BOX<u>></u>5), while specificity ranged from 63%-87%. Multivariable linear regression showed that higher BOX scores predicted higher initial PCSS scores (β = 0.323, <i>p</i> = 0.049) but did not predict RTL, SR, or RTP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EyeBOX demonstrated moderate specificity but limited sensitivity for identifying SRC and scores were associated with initial symptom severity. While it may not be useful as a standalone diagnostic tool, EyeBOX may serve as an adjunct for confirming concussion in youth athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"618-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of sport-related concussion using objective eye tracking.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony E Bishay, Kristen L Williams, Nick De Oliviera, Samuel W Fitch, Eunyoung Hong, Scott L Zuckerman, Douglas P Terry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699052.2025.2465371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate EyeBOX in an adolescent sport-related concussion (SRC) population by comparing scores between concussed and non-concussed athletes, examining sensitivity/specificity, and assessing clinical recovery associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, unmatched case-control study examined concussed adolescents (11-22 years) treated in a sports concussion clinic who underwent EyeBOX testing. Concussed participants completed symptom scales and follow-up assessments. Analyses included t-tests comparing groups, sensitivity/specificity analyses, and models examining relationships between BOX scores and recovery outcomes, including initial post-concussion symptom severity (PCSS) scores, return to learn (RTL), symptom resolution (SR), and return to play (RTP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 36 youth athletes with SRCs and 30 non-concussed controls. BOX scores were significantly higher in concussed participants (7.9 ± 5.2) compared to controls (5.4 ± 5.1; <i>t</i> = 2.062, <i>p</i> = 0.043, Cohen's d = 0.479). Sensitivity for detecting concussion ranged from 22% (BOX<u>></u>10) to 61% (BOX<u>></u>5), while specificity ranged from 63%-87%. Multivariable linear regression showed that higher BOX scores predicted higher initial PCSS scores (β = 0.323, <i>p</i> = 0.049) but did not predict RTL, SR, or RTP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EyeBOX demonstrated moderate specificity but limited sensitivity for identifying SRC and scores were associated with initial symptom severity. While it may not be useful as a standalone diagnostic tool, EyeBOX may serve as an adjunct for confirming concussion in youth athletes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"618-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2465371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2025.2465371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过比较脑震荡和非脑震荡运动员的评分,检查敏感性/特异性,评估临床恢复相关性,评估青少年运动相关脑震荡(SRC)人群的EyeBOX。方法:一项前瞻性、无与伦比的病例对照研究对在一家运动脑震荡诊所接受EyeBOX测试的11-22岁的脑震荡青少年进行了调查。脑震荡参与者完成症状量表和随访评估。分析包括t检验比较各组、敏感性/特异性分析和检验BOX评分与恢复结果之间关系的模型,包括初始脑震荡后症状严重程度(PCSS)评分、恢复学习(RTL)、症状缓解(SR)和恢复游戏(RTP)。结果:参与者包括36名患有src的青少年运动员和30名未脑震荡的对照组。脑震荡参与者的BOX评分(7.9±5.2)明显高于对照组(5.4±5.1);t = 2.062, p = 0.043, Cohen’s d = 0.479)。检测脑震荡的灵敏度从22% (BOX>10)到61% (BOX>5),特异性从63%-87%不等。多变量线性回归显示,BOX评分越高,PCSS初始评分越高(β = 0.323, p = 0.049),但不能预测RTL、SR或RTP。结论:EyeBOX在识别SRC方面具有中等特异性,但敏感性有限,评分与初始症状严重程度相关。虽然它可能不是一个独立的诊断工具,但EyeBOX可以作为确认青少年运动员脑震荡的辅助工具。
Evaluation of sport-related concussion using objective eye tracking.
Objective: Evaluate EyeBOX in an adolescent sport-related concussion (SRC) population by comparing scores between concussed and non-concussed athletes, examining sensitivity/specificity, and assessing clinical recovery associations.
Methods: A prospective, unmatched case-control study examined concussed adolescents (11-22 years) treated in a sports concussion clinic who underwent EyeBOX testing. Concussed participants completed symptom scales and follow-up assessments. Analyses included t-tests comparing groups, sensitivity/specificity analyses, and models examining relationships between BOX scores and recovery outcomes, including initial post-concussion symptom severity (PCSS) scores, return to learn (RTL), symptom resolution (SR), and return to play (RTP).
Results: Participants included 36 youth athletes with SRCs and 30 non-concussed controls. BOX scores were significantly higher in concussed participants (7.9 ± 5.2) compared to controls (5.4 ± 5.1; t = 2.062, p = 0.043, Cohen's d = 0.479). Sensitivity for detecting concussion ranged from 22% (BOX>10) to 61% (BOX>5), while specificity ranged from 63%-87%. Multivariable linear regression showed that higher BOX scores predicted higher initial PCSS scores (β = 0.323, p = 0.049) but did not predict RTL, SR, or RTP.
Conclusion: EyeBOX demonstrated moderate specificity but limited sensitivity for identifying SRC and scores were associated with initial symptom severity. While it may not be useful as a standalone diagnostic tool, EyeBOX may serve as an adjunct for confirming concussion in youth athletes.
期刊介绍:
Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.