Cajsa M Isgren, Gina L Pinchbeck, Shebl E Salem, Michelle J Hann, Neil B Townsend, Matthew D Cullen, Debra C Archer
{"title":"评估紧急马剖腹手术后支架敷料和腹部绷带对手术部位感染的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Cajsa M Isgren, Gina L Pinchbeck, Shebl E Salem, Michelle J Hann, Neil B Townsend, Matthew D Cullen, Debra C Archer","doi":"10.1111/evj.14482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent complication following emergency equine laparotomy, negatively impacting equine welfare, increasing treatment costs and presenting a hospital biosecurity risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if a sutured-on stent dressing for incisional protection during anaesthetic recovery reduced SSI following emergency laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible horses were randomised to a sutured-on stent (intervention) or textile dressing (control) as the primary component of a 3-layer abdominal bandage placed for anaesthetic recovery. Horses were followed up to 90 days postoperatively. Data were analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Time to SSI (primary outcome) for each group was analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary outcomes (SSI and pyrexia during hospitalisation, days hospitalisation and incisional hernia formation at 90 days) were analysed using Chi-squared tests and a univariable logistic regression model (categorical data) or by comparing means between groups (continuous data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 352 eligible horses enrolled (167 intervention group, 185 control group), SSI developed in 101 (28.7%) at a mean of 9.7 days (SD 4.6 days). Rate of SSI was not significantly different between groups unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.23, p = 0.4) or adjusted for variables significantly associated with rate of SSI (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.30, p = 0.5). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between intervention and control groups.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Single-centre study evaluating incisional protection from a primary dressing under a secondary adhesive and tertiary fabric abdominal bandage for anaesthetic recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of a sutured-on stent compared with a textile adhesive dressing as the primary layer of an abdominal bandage for anaesthetic recovery did not reduce the rate of SSI. Further RCT are warranted to investigate efficacy of other interventions on reduction of SSI following emergency laparotomy in horses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11796,"journal":{"name":"Equine Veterinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a stent dressing and abdominal bandage on surgical site infection following emergency equine laparotomy: A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cajsa M Isgren, Gina L Pinchbeck, Shebl E Salem, Michelle J Hann, Neil B Townsend, Matthew D Cullen, Debra C Archer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/evj.14482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent complication following emergency equine laparotomy, negatively impacting equine welfare, increasing treatment costs and presenting a hospital biosecurity risk.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if a sutured-on stent dressing for incisional protection during anaesthetic recovery reduced SSI following emergency laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible horses were randomised to a sutured-on stent (intervention) or textile dressing (control) as the primary component of a 3-layer abdominal bandage placed for anaesthetic recovery. Horses were followed up to 90 days postoperatively. Data were analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Time to SSI (primary outcome) for each group was analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary outcomes (SSI and pyrexia during hospitalisation, days hospitalisation and incisional hernia formation at 90 days) were analysed using Chi-squared tests and a univariable logistic regression model (categorical data) or by comparing means between groups (continuous data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 352 eligible horses enrolled (167 intervention group, 185 control group), SSI developed in 101 (28.7%) at a mean of 9.7 days (SD 4.6 days). Rate of SSI was not significantly different between groups unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.23, p = 0.4) or adjusted for variables significantly associated with rate of SSI (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.30, p = 0.5). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between intervention and control groups.</p><p><strong>Main limitations: </strong>Single-centre study evaluating incisional protection from a primary dressing under a secondary adhesive and tertiary fabric abdominal bandage for anaesthetic recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of a sutured-on stent compared with a textile adhesive dressing as the primary layer of an abdominal bandage for anaesthetic recovery did not reduce the rate of SSI. Further RCT are warranted to investigate efficacy of other interventions on reduction of SSI following emergency laparotomy in horses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equine Veterinary Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equine Veterinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14482\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.14482","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是急诊马剖腹手术后常见的并发症,对马的福利产生负面影响,增加治疗费用并带来医院生物安全风险。目的:确定麻醉恢复期间用于切口保护的缝合支架敷料是否能减少紧急剖腹手术后的SSI。研究设计:随机对照试验。方法:符合条件的马被随机分配到缝合支架(干预)或纺织品敷料(对照)作为三层腹部绷带的主要组成部分,用于麻醉恢复。术后随访至90 d。根据意向治疗原则对数据进行分析。采用Cox比例风险模型分析各组发生SSI的时间(主要结局)。次要结局(住院期间SSI和发热、住院天数和90天切口疝形成)采用卡方检验和单变量logistic回归模型(分类数据)或组间均值比较(连续数据)进行分析。结果:352匹符合条件的马(干预组167匹,对照组185匹),101匹(28.7%)发生SSI,平均9.7天(SD 4.6天)。未调整组(风险比[HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.23, p = 0.4)或调整与SSI率显著相关的变量(风险比[HR] 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.30, p = 0.5)之间SSI率无显著差异。干预组与对照组的次要结局无显著差异。主要局限性:单中心研究评估了在麻醉恢复中,在二次粘接剂和第三次织物腹部绷带下进行一次包扎对切口的保护。结论:在麻醉恢复中,使用缝合支架与使用纺织粘合敷料作为腹部绷带的第一层相比,并没有降低SSI的发生率。需要进一步的随机对照试验来研究其他干预措施对减少急诊开腹手术后马的SSI的疗效。
Evaluation of a stent dressing and abdominal bandage on surgical site infection following emergency equine laparotomy: A randomised controlled trial.
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a frequent complication following emergency equine laparotomy, negatively impacting equine welfare, increasing treatment costs and presenting a hospital biosecurity risk.
Objectives: To determine if a sutured-on stent dressing for incisional protection during anaesthetic recovery reduced SSI following emergency laparotomy.
Study design: Randomised controlled trial.
Methods: Eligible horses were randomised to a sutured-on stent (intervention) or textile dressing (control) as the primary component of a 3-layer abdominal bandage placed for anaesthetic recovery. Horses were followed up to 90 days postoperatively. Data were analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Time to SSI (primary outcome) for each group was analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Secondary outcomes (SSI and pyrexia during hospitalisation, days hospitalisation and incisional hernia formation at 90 days) were analysed using Chi-squared tests and a univariable logistic regression model (categorical data) or by comparing means between groups (continuous data).
Results: Of 352 eligible horses enrolled (167 intervention group, 185 control group), SSI developed in 101 (28.7%) at a mean of 9.7 days (SD 4.6 days). Rate of SSI was not significantly different between groups unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.23, p = 0.4) or adjusted for variables significantly associated with rate of SSI (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.59-1.30, p = 0.5). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between intervention and control groups.
Main limitations: Single-centre study evaluating incisional protection from a primary dressing under a secondary adhesive and tertiary fabric abdominal bandage for anaesthetic recovery.
Conclusions: Use of a sutured-on stent compared with a textile adhesive dressing as the primary layer of an abdominal bandage for anaesthetic recovery did not reduce the rate of SSI. Further RCT are warranted to investigate efficacy of other interventions on reduction of SSI following emergency laparotomy in horses.
期刊介绍:
Equine Veterinary Journal publishes evidence to improve clinical practice or expand scientific knowledge underpinning equine veterinary medicine. This unrivalled international scientific journal is published 6 times per year, containing peer-reviewed articles with original and potentially important findings. Contributions are received from sources worldwide.