社会人口统计学和产科因素与分娩经验之间的关系。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Daniella Rozsa, Ragnar Kvie Sande, Stine Bernitz, Ingvild Dalen, Geir Sverre Braut, Pål Øian, Torbjørn M. Eggebø, Rebecka Dalbye
{"title":"社会人口统计学和产科因素与分娩经验之间的关系。","authors":"Daniella Rozsa,&nbsp;Ragnar Kvie Sande,&nbsp;Stine Bernitz,&nbsp;Ingvild Dalen,&nbsp;Geir Sverre Braut,&nbsp;Pål Øian,&nbsp;Torbjørn M. Eggebø,&nbsp;Rebecka Dalbye","doi":"10.1111/aogs.15076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Sociodemographic and obstetric factors have been shown to impact childbirth experience, but results regarding the effect of certain factors have been heterogeneous. It is important to understand how individual risk factors affect childbirth experience to be able to identify women at risk for negative childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to determine individual associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors and childbirth experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The Labor Progression Study (LaPS-NCT02221427) was a multicenter randomized trial examining clinical consequences of using Zhang's guideline vs the WHO partograph on intrapartum cesarean section rate. Four weeks after delivery, 5810 women received the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) online. The CEQ consists of 19 questions on four subscales (own capacity, professional support, perceived safety, and participation). The total CEQ score is the mean score of each of the subscale scores, ranging from 1 to 4, a higher score indicating a better childbirth experience. Sociodemographic (age, body mass index, education, civil status, and smoking) and obstetric (gestational age, prolonged labor, mode of delivery, and obstetric complications) characteristics of the women were recorded, and associations to total and subscale CEQ scores were examined with log-linear regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In all, 3604 women answered the questionnaire, a 62.9% response rate. The mean (SD) total CEQ score was of 3.24 (0.43). The subscale score was highest for professional support, mean 3.68 (0.49), and lowest for own capacity, mean 2.61 (0.54). The total CEQ score was not associated with any of the sociodemographic characteristics examined. Smoking in the first trimester was associated with lower scores on the professional support subscale 3.61 (3.55, 3.67) than nonsmokers, 3.69 (3.68, 3.71); <i>p</i> = 0.001. Of obstetric factors, only delivering in week 37 was significantly associated with a higher total CEQ score, 3.34 (3.28, 3.40), vs. 3.24 (3.22, 3.26) at 40 weeks, <i>p</i> = 0.002. Findings remained significant in adjusted analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In our study, individual sociodemographic factors did not impact overall the childbirth experience. Smoking was associated with a lower score on the professional support subscale. Delivery in week 37 was associated with a better overall childbirth experience. No other obstetric factor influenced the childbirth experience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"104 4","pages":"637-646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.15076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors, and childbirth experience\",\"authors\":\"Daniella Rozsa,&nbsp;Ragnar Kvie Sande,&nbsp;Stine Bernitz,&nbsp;Ingvild Dalen,&nbsp;Geir Sverre Braut,&nbsp;Pål Øian,&nbsp;Torbjørn M. Eggebø,&nbsp;Rebecka Dalbye\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.15076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sociodemographic and obstetric factors have been shown to impact childbirth experience, but results regarding the effect of certain factors have been heterogeneous. It is important to understand how individual risk factors affect childbirth experience to be able to identify women at risk for negative childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to determine individual associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors and childbirth experience.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The Labor Progression Study (LaPS-NCT02221427) was a multicenter randomized trial examining clinical consequences of using Zhang's guideline vs the WHO partograph on intrapartum cesarean section rate. Four weeks after delivery, 5810 women received the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) online. The CEQ consists of 19 questions on four subscales (own capacity, professional support, perceived safety, and participation). The total CEQ score is the mean score of each of the subscale scores, ranging from 1 to 4, a higher score indicating a better childbirth experience. Sociodemographic (age, body mass index, education, civil status, and smoking) and obstetric (gestational age, prolonged labor, mode of delivery, and obstetric complications) characteristics of the women were recorded, and associations to total and subscale CEQ scores were examined with log-linear regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In all, 3604 women answered the questionnaire, a 62.9% response rate. The mean (SD) total CEQ score was of 3.24 (0.43). The subscale score was highest for professional support, mean 3.68 (0.49), and lowest for own capacity, mean 2.61 (0.54). The total CEQ score was not associated with any of the sociodemographic characteristics examined. Smoking in the first trimester was associated with lower scores on the professional support subscale 3.61 (3.55, 3.67) than nonsmokers, 3.69 (3.68, 3.71); <i>p</i> = 0.001. Of obstetric factors, only delivering in week 37 was significantly associated with a higher total CEQ score, 3.34 (3.28, 3.40), vs. 3.24 (3.22, 3.26) at 40 weeks, <i>p</i> = 0.002. Findings remained significant in adjusted analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In our study, individual sociodemographic factors did not impact overall the childbirth experience. Smoking was associated with a lower score on the professional support subscale. Delivery in week 37 was associated with a better overall childbirth experience. No other obstetric factor influenced the childbirth experience.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"104 4\",\"pages\":\"637-646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aogs.15076\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.15076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会人口学和产科因素已被证明会影响分娩经验,但关于某些因素的影响的结果是异质的。重要的是要了解个体风险因素如何影响分娩经历,以便能够识别有消极分娩经历风险的妇女。本研究的目的是确定社会人口学和产科因素与分娩经历之间的个体关联。材料和方法:产程研究(lap - nct02221427)是一项多中心随机试验,研究使用张氏指南和WHO产程图对产时剖宫产率的临床影响。分娩后四周,5810名妇女在线接受了分娩体验问卷(CEQ)。CEQ由四个子量表(自身能力、专业支持、感知安全性和参与)的19个问题组成。CEQ总分为各分量表得分的平均值,分值为1 ~ 4分,分值越高表示分娩体验越好。记录妇女的社会人口学特征(年龄、体重指数、受教育程度、公民身份和吸烟)和产科特征(胎龄、分娩时间延长、分娩方式和产科并发症),并使用对数线性回归检查CEQ总分和亚量表评分之间的关系。结果:共有3604名女性参与问卷调查,回复率为62.9%。CEQ总分平均(SD)为3.24分(0.43分)。职业支持得分最高,平均3.68分(0.49分),自我能力得分最低,平均2.61分(0.54分)。CEQ总分与所检查的任何社会人口学特征无关。怀孕前三个月吸烟与职业支持分量表得分(3.61(3.55,3.67)比不吸烟(3.69(3.68,3.71))低相关;p = 0.001。在产科因素中,仅在第37周分娩与较高的总CEQ评分显著相关,第40周时为3.34(3.28,3.40),第40周为3.24 (3.22,3.26),p = 0.002。调整后的分析结果仍然显著。结论:在我们的研究中,个体社会人口学因素对分娩经历总体上没有影响。吸烟与职业支持量表得分较低有关。第37周分娩与更好的整体分娩体验相关。没有其他产科因素影响分娩经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors, and childbirth experience

Associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors, and childbirth experience

Introduction

Sociodemographic and obstetric factors have been shown to impact childbirth experience, but results regarding the effect of certain factors have been heterogeneous. It is important to understand how individual risk factors affect childbirth experience to be able to identify women at risk for negative childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to determine individual associations between sociodemographic and obstetric factors and childbirth experience.

Material and Methods

The Labor Progression Study (LaPS-NCT02221427) was a multicenter randomized trial examining clinical consequences of using Zhang's guideline vs the WHO partograph on intrapartum cesarean section rate. Four weeks after delivery, 5810 women received the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) online. The CEQ consists of 19 questions on four subscales (own capacity, professional support, perceived safety, and participation). The total CEQ score is the mean score of each of the subscale scores, ranging from 1 to 4, a higher score indicating a better childbirth experience. Sociodemographic (age, body mass index, education, civil status, and smoking) and obstetric (gestational age, prolonged labor, mode of delivery, and obstetric complications) characteristics of the women were recorded, and associations to total and subscale CEQ scores were examined with log-linear regression.

Results

In all, 3604 women answered the questionnaire, a 62.9% response rate. The mean (SD) total CEQ score was of 3.24 (0.43). The subscale score was highest for professional support, mean 3.68 (0.49), and lowest for own capacity, mean 2.61 (0.54). The total CEQ score was not associated with any of the sociodemographic characteristics examined. Smoking in the first trimester was associated with lower scores on the professional support subscale 3.61 (3.55, 3.67) than nonsmokers, 3.69 (3.68, 3.71); p = 0.001. Of obstetric factors, only delivering in week 37 was significantly associated with a higher total CEQ score, 3.34 (3.28, 3.40), vs. 3.24 (3.22, 3.26) at 40 weeks, p = 0.002. Findings remained significant in adjusted analysis.

Conclusions

In our study, individual sociodemographic factors did not impact overall the childbirth experience. Smoking was associated with a lower score on the professional support subscale. Delivery in week 37 was associated with a better overall childbirth experience. No other obstetric factor influenced the childbirth experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信