局部系统发育多样性变化的广泛和分化模式

IF 4.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Philippe Fernandez-Fournier, Tadhg Carroll, Maria Dornelas, Arne Ø. Mooers
{"title":"局部系统发育多样性变化的广泛和分化模式","authors":"Philippe Fernandez-Fournier,&nbsp;Tadhg Carroll,&nbsp;Maria Dornelas,&nbsp;Arne Ø. Mooers","doi":"10.1111/ddi.13948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Ecosystems are witnessing drastic changes in biodiversity worldwide. However, it is still unclear whether changes in phylogenetic diversity—a measure of the evolutionary relationships among species—reflect observed changes in species richness. Specifically, we ask whether changes in local phylogenetic diversity correlate with changes in species richness and examine if major taxonomic groups show diverging trends.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We estimate how local phylogenetic diversity has changed compared to species richness and whether there were diverging patterns across taxonomic groups. We use a database of compiled assemblage time series from around the world, BioTIME. We use assemblage total evolutionary history (Faith's phylogenetic diversity; PD) as well as average relatedness (mean pairwise distance and mean nearest taxon distance; MPD and MNTD, respectively) as measures of phylogenetic diversity and report taxon-level and assemblage-level posterior slope estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. We report trends in four major taxonomic groups: fish, birds, terrestrial mammals and terrestrial plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found strong evidence of widespread increases in MPD across fish and bird assemblages, reflecting decreases in average relatedness and strong evidence of a decrease of MPD in mammals, indicating the opposite. Conversely, we did not find consistent directional change in MNTD, though null average trends included notable positive and negative trends across studies and regions. We also found moderate evidence that SR and PD were increasing in fish assemblages, while they were decreasing in mammals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that changes in species composition are significantly altering the evolutionary makeup of assemblages at the local scale and that overall patterns diverge within and across taxonomic groups. We suggest potential drivers of these changes but highlight that our results are more generalisable for fish and birds than for mammals and plants, given the variation in geographical coverage and sample size.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51018,"journal":{"name":"Diversity and Distributions","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13948","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Widespread and Diverging Patterns of Change in Local Phylogenetic Diversity\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Fernandez-Fournier,&nbsp;Tadhg Carroll,&nbsp;Maria Dornelas,&nbsp;Arne Ø. Mooers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddi.13948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ecosystems are witnessing drastic changes in biodiversity worldwide. However, it is still unclear whether changes in phylogenetic diversity—a measure of the evolutionary relationships among species—reflect observed changes in species richness. Specifically, we ask whether changes in local phylogenetic diversity correlate with changes in species richness and examine if major taxonomic groups show diverging trends.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Global.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We estimate how local phylogenetic diversity has changed compared to species richness and whether there were diverging patterns across taxonomic groups. We use a database of compiled assemblage time series from around the world, BioTIME. We use assemblage total evolutionary history (Faith's phylogenetic diversity; PD) as well as average relatedness (mean pairwise distance and mean nearest taxon distance; MPD and MNTD, respectively) as measures of phylogenetic diversity and report taxon-level and assemblage-level posterior slope estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. We report trends in four major taxonomic groups: fish, birds, terrestrial mammals and terrestrial plants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found strong evidence of widespread increases in MPD across fish and bird assemblages, reflecting decreases in average relatedness and strong evidence of a decrease of MPD in mammals, indicating the opposite. Conversely, we did not find consistent directional change in MNTD, though null average trends included notable positive and negative trends across studies and regions. We also found moderate evidence that SR and PD were increasing in fish assemblages, while they were decreasing in mammals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings suggest that changes in species composition are significantly altering the evolutionary makeup of assemblages at the local scale and that overall patterns diverge within and across taxonomic groups. We suggest potential drivers of these changes but highlight that our results are more generalisable for fish and birds than for mammals and plants, given the variation in geographical coverage and sample size.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddi.13948\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diversity and Distributions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity and Distributions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddi.13948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态系统正在见证世界范围内生物多样性的剧烈变化。然而,尚不清楚系统发育多样性的变化是否反映了物种丰富度的变化。系统发育多样性是衡量物种之间进化关系的一种指标。具体来说,我们想知道本地系统发育多样性的变化是否与物种丰富度的变化相关,并检查主要分类类群是否呈现分化趋势。位置 全球。方法与物种丰富度相比,我们估计了当地系统发育多样性的变化情况,以及不同分类类群之间是否存在分化模式。我们使用来自世界各地的汇编时间序列数据库,BioTIME。我们使用组合总进化史(Faith’s系统发育多样性;PD)和平均亲缘性(平均两两距离和平均最近分类群距离;MPD和MNTD)作为系统发育多样性的度量,并从贝叶斯层次模型报告分类群水平和组合水平的后验斜率估计。我们报告了四个主要分类群体的趋势:鱼类、鸟类、陆生哺乳动物和陆生植物。结果:我们发现了强有力的证据,表明MPD在鱼类和鸟类种群中普遍增加,反映了平均亲缘关系的下降;强有力的证据表明,哺乳动物的MPD在减少,表明相反。相反,我们在MNTD中没有发现一致的方向变化,尽管零平均趋势在研究和地区中包括显著的正趋势和负趋势。我们还发现适度的证据表明SR和PD在鱼类组合中增加,而在哺乳动物中减少。本研究结果表明,物种组成的变化在局部尺度上显著地改变了物种组合的进化组成,并且在类群内部和不同类群之间,物种组合的进化模式存在差异。我们提出了这些变化的潜在驱动因素,但强调我们的结果更适用于鱼类和鸟类,而不是哺乳动物和植物,考虑到地理覆盖和样本量的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Widespread and Diverging Patterns of Change in Local Phylogenetic Diversity

Widespread and Diverging Patterns of Change in Local Phylogenetic Diversity

Aim

Ecosystems are witnessing drastic changes in biodiversity worldwide. However, it is still unclear whether changes in phylogenetic diversity—a measure of the evolutionary relationships among species—reflect observed changes in species richness. Specifically, we ask whether changes in local phylogenetic diversity correlate with changes in species richness and examine if major taxonomic groups show diverging trends.

Location

Global.

Methods

We estimate how local phylogenetic diversity has changed compared to species richness and whether there were diverging patterns across taxonomic groups. We use a database of compiled assemblage time series from around the world, BioTIME. We use assemblage total evolutionary history (Faith's phylogenetic diversity; PD) as well as average relatedness (mean pairwise distance and mean nearest taxon distance; MPD and MNTD, respectively) as measures of phylogenetic diversity and report taxon-level and assemblage-level posterior slope estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. We report trends in four major taxonomic groups: fish, birds, terrestrial mammals and terrestrial plants.

Results

We found strong evidence of widespread increases in MPD across fish and bird assemblages, reflecting decreases in average relatedness and strong evidence of a decrease of MPD in mammals, indicating the opposite. Conversely, we did not find consistent directional change in MNTD, though null average trends included notable positive and negative trends across studies and regions. We also found moderate evidence that SR and PD were increasing in fish assemblages, while they were decreasing in mammals.

Main Conclusions

Our findings suggest that changes in species composition are significantly altering the evolutionary makeup of assemblages at the local scale and that overall patterns diverge within and across taxonomic groups. We suggest potential drivers of these changes but highlight that our results are more generalisable for fish and birds than for mammals and plants, given the variation in geographical coverage and sample size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diversity and Distributions
Diversity and Distributions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
195
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Diversity and Distributions is a journal of conservation biogeography. We publish papers that deal with the application of biogeographical principles, theories, and analyses (being those concerned with the distributional dynamics of taxa and assemblages) to problems concerning the conservation of biodiversity. We no longer consider papers the sole aim of which is to describe or analyze patterns of biodiversity or to elucidate processes that generate biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信