高速同步电机:技术与限制

IF 7.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Mauro Di Nardo;Gianvito Gallicchio;Francesco Cupertino;Marco Palmieri;Mohammad Reza Ilkhani;Michele Degano;Chris Gerada
{"title":"高速同步电机:技术与限制","authors":"Mauro Di Nardo;Gianvito Gallicchio;Francesco Cupertino;Marco Palmieri;Mohammad Reza Ilkhani;Michele Degano;Chris Gerada","doi":"10.1109/OJIA.2025.3531227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a comprehensive comparison of high-speed synchronous machines, encompassing synchronous reluctance, its permanent magnet variant, and surface permanent magnet synchronous motors. The evaluation of their maximum performance capabilities employs a hybrid analytical-finite element design procedure able to address electromagnetic, thermal, and structural requirements simultaneously. Indeed, the adopted design methodology takes into account all the machines nonlinearities, while also including the limitations introduced by the iron ribs of the reluctance machine, retaining sleeve of the surface permanent magnet machine and increasing iron losses. The aim of the outlined design exercise is to evaluate the effect of different design specifications on the maximum achievable performance of the three machine topologies. A wide range of maximum design speeds, airgap thicknesses, and cooling system capabilities has been assessed showing when and why one motor type outperforms the others. The cooling system capability increment required by the reluctance-based machines to achieve the performance of the surface permanent magnet one has been systematically quantified. The design assumptions have been verified by a thermal analysis supporting the final machine selection. Three different machines designed with a maximum speed of 80 kr/min have been prototyped and tested on an instrumented test rig, validating all the design considerations.","PeriodicalId":100629,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","volume":"6 ","pages":"93-106"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10844533","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Speed Synchronous Machines: Technologies and Limits\",\"authors\":\"Mauro Di Nardo;Gianvito Gallicchio;Francesco Cupertino;Marco Palmieri;Mohammad Reza Ilkhani;Michele Degano;Chris Gerada\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJIA.2025.3531227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a comprehensive comparison of high-speed synchronous machines, encompassing synchronous reluctance, its permanent magnet variant, and surface permanent magnet synchronous motors. The evaluation of their maximum performance capabilities employs a hybrid analytical-finite element design procedure able to address electromagnetic, thermal, and structural requirements simultaneously. Indeed, the adopted design methodology takes into account all the machines nonlinearities, while also including the limitations introduced by the iron ribs of the reluctance machine, retaining sleeve of the surface permanent magnet machine and increasing iron losses. The aim of the outlined design exercise is to evaluate the effect of different design specifications on the maximum achievable performance of the three machine topologies. A wide range of maximum design speeds, airgap thicknesses, and cooling system capabilities has been assessed showing when and why one motor type outperforms the others. The cooling system capability increment required by the reluctance-based machines to achieve the performance of the surface permanent magnet one has been systematically quantified. The design assumptions have been verified by a thermal analysis supporting the final machine selection. Three different machines designed with a maximum speed of 80 kr/min have been prototyped and tested on an instrumented test rig, validating all the design considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"93-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10844533\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10844533/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Industry Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10844533/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了高速同步电机的全面比较,包括同步磁阻,其永磁变体,和表面永磁同步电机。其最大性能评估采用混合分析-有限元设计程序,能够同时解决电磁、热和结构要求。实际上,所采用的设计方法考虑了所有机器的非线性,同时也考虑了磁阻电机的铁肋、表面永磁电机的保留套筒和铁损耗增加所带来的限制。概述设计练习的目的是评估不同设计规范对三种机器拓扑的最大可实现性能的影响。广泛的最大设计速度,气隙厚度和冷却系统能力已被评估,显示何时以及为什么一种电机类型优于其他。系统地量化了磁阻电机达到表面永磁体性能所需的冷却系统能力增量。设计假设已通过支持最终机器选择的热分析得到验证。设计了三种不同的机器,最高速度为80氪/分钟,并在仪器测试台上进行了原型和测试,验证了所有设计考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Speed Synchronous Machines: Technologies and Limits
This article presents a comprehensive comparison of high-speed synchronous machines, encompassing synchronous reluctance, its permanent magnet variant, and surface permanent magnet synchronous motors. The evaluation of their maximum performance capabilities employs a hybrid analytical-finite element design procedure able to address electromagnetic, thermal, and structural requirements simultaneously. Indeed, the adopted design methodology takes into account all the machines nonlinearities, while also including the limitations introduced by the iron ribs of the reluctance machine, retaining sleeve of the surface permanent magnet machine and increasing iron losses. The aim of the outlined design exercise is to evaluate the effect of different design specifications on the maximum achievable performance of the three machine topologies. A wide range of maximum design speeds, airgap thicknesses, and cooling system capabilities has been assessed showing when and why one motor type outperforms the others. The cooling system capability increment required by the reluctance-based machines to achieve the performance of the surface permanent magnet one has been systematically quantified. The design assumptions have been verified by a thermal analysis supporting the final machine selection. Three different machines designed with a maximum speed of 80 kr/min have been prototyped and tested on an instrumented test rig, validating all the design considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信