探讨印度中部某三级医院严重药物不良反应的深入分析

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Preeti Singh , Shekhar Verma , Yogesh Vaishnav , Usha Joshi , Manju Agrawal
{"title":"探讨印度中部某三级医院严重药物不良反应的深入分析","authors":"Preeti Singh ,&nbsp;Shekhar Verma ,&nbsp;Yogesh Vaishnav ,&nbsp;Usha Joshi ,&nbsp;Manju Agrawal","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) represent a critical challenge in contemporary healthcare, necessitating comprehensive investigation and analysis. Within Central India, where healthcare systems grapple with unique demographic, epidemiological, and infrastructural dynamics, understanding the landscape of serious ADRs is paramount.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate serious ADRs related to age, gender, most implicated class of drugs &amp; single drug, hospital admission, most affected system organ classes, causality and outcome of reactions and fatalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analysed serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded from January 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of Pharmacology, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur (ADR monitoring centre), and submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India database using VigiFlow® for further process. ADRs were collected from Dr. BRAM Hospital and DKS Hospital and recorded using the standard suspected ADR reporting form (version 1.4). Cases were classified as serious if they met at least one criterion from the WHO-UMC scale, with some cases meeting multiple criteria. Causality was assessed using the WHO-UMC scale, ensuring patient and reporter confidentiality. Descriptive statistics such as number and frequency were used to analyse serious ADRs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 762 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow® during the study period, of which 239 (31.36 %) were classified as serious ADRs. The demographic distribution revealed a slight preponderance of females 125 (52.30 %) over males 113 (47.28 %). The hospital admissions due to ADRs were 57 (23.84 %). Antibiotics were the most commonly associated drug class (52.30 %), followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (11.29 %). Among individual drugs, ceftriaxone and phenytoin were the most common drugs involved in serious ADRs. Adults were the most affected, 185 (77.40 %) compared to other age groups. The skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, system organ class (SOC)155 (46.55 %) was highly affected, while erythematous and maculopapular rashes were the most common. Eleven Stevens-Johnson syndrome cases and three toxic epidermal necrolysis cases, like specific ADRs, were also obtained. The most ADRs were probable 121 (50.60 %) and possible 100 (41.84 %) category.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the significant burden of serious ADRs within Central India, emphasising the need for heightened pharmacovigilance and targeted interventions, especially among adults. The prevalence of serious ADRs in females and adults and the impact on hospitalisations emphasise the need for cautious drug use, especially in inpatient settings. Limited understanding and reporting exist regarding the profile of serious ADRs in resource-limited countries. The findings will contribute to developing strategies for shaping future policies to promote the safer use of medicines. The under-reporting of ADRs in our setting and low-income countries is also a concern. Therefore, it is imperative to raise awareness about ADR reporting by healthcare professionals as well as patients to promote the safe utilisation of drugs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probing the in-depth analysis of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Central India\",\"authors\":\"Preeti Singh ,&nbsp;Shekhar Verma ,&nbsp;Yogesh Vaishnav ,&nbsp;Usha Joshi ,&nbsp;Manju Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) represent a critical challenge in contemporary healthcare, necessitating comprehensive investigation and analysis. Within Central India, where healthcare systems grapple with unique demographic, epidemiological, and infrastructural dynamics, understanding the landscape of serious ADRs is paramount.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate serious ADRs related to age, gender, most implicated class of drugs &amp; single drug, hospital admission, most affected system organ classes, causality and outcome of reactions and fatalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study analysed serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded from January 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of Pharmacology, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur (ADR monitoring centre), and submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India database using VigiFlow® for further process. ADRs were collected from Dr. BRAM Hospital and DKS Hospital and recorded using the standard suspected ADR reporting form (version 1.4). Cases were classified as serious if they met at least one criterion from the WHO-UMC scale, with some cases meeting multiple criteria. Causality was assessed using the WHO-UMC scale, ensuring patient and reporter confidentiality. Descriptive statistics such as number and frequency were used to analyse serious ADRs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 762 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow® during the study period, of which 239 (31.36 %) were classified as serious ADRs. The demographic distribution revealed a slight preponderance of females 125 (52.30 %) over males 113 (47.28 %). The hospital admissions due to ADRs were 57 (23.84 %). Antibiotics were the most commonly associated drug class (52.30 %), followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (11.29 %). Among individual drugs, ceftriaxone and phenytoin were the most common drugs involved in serious ADRs. Adults were the most affected, 185 (77.40 %) compared to other age groups. The skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, system organ class (SOC)155 (46.55 %) was highly affected, while erythematous and maculopapular rashes were the most common. Eleven Stevens-Johnson syndrome cases and three toxic epidermal necrolysis cases, like specific ADRs, were also obtained. The most ADRs were probable 121 (50.60 %) and possible 100 (41.84 %) category.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the significant burden of serious ADRs within Central India, emphasising the need for heightened pharmacovigilance and targeted interventions, especially among adults. The prevalence of serious ADRs in females and adults and the impact on hospitalisations emphasise the need for cautious drug use, especially in inpatient settings. Limited understanding and reporting exist regarding the profile of serious ADRs in resource-limited countries. The findings will contribute to developing strategies for shaping future policies to promote the safer use of medicines. The under-reporting of ADRs in our setting and low-income countries is also a concern. Therefore, it is imperative to raise awareness about ADR reporting by healthcare professionals as well as patients to promote the safe utilisation of drugs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重药物不良反应(adr)是当代医疗保健面临的重大挑战,需要进行全面的调查和分析。在印度中部,医疗保健系统与独特的人口、流行病学和基础设施动态作斗争,了解严重不良反应的情况至关重要。目的评价严重不良反应与年龄、性别、最相关药物类别的关系;单一药物,住院情况,最受影响的系统器官类别,因果关系和反应和死亡的结果。方法本回顾性研究分析了2016年1月至2019年12月在赖布尔JNM医学院药学系(ADR监测中心)记录的严重个案安全报告(ICSRs),并使用VigiFlow®提交给印度药物警戒规划数据库进行进一步处理。从Dr. BRAM医院和DKS医院收集不良反应,并使用标准的疑似不良反应报告表(1.4版)进行记录。如果病例至少符合世卫组织-世卫组织国际卫生组织标准中的一项标准,则将其列为严重病例,有些病例符合多项标准。使用WHO-UMC量表评估因果关系,确保患者和报告者保密。描述性统计如数量和频率用于分析严重adr。结果在研究期间,VigiFlow®共录入了762例icsr,其中239例(31.36%)为严重adr。人口统计学分布显示,女性125(52.30%)略高于男性113(47.28%)。因不良反应住院57例(23.84%)。抗生素是最常见的相关药物类别(52.30%),其次是非甾体抗炎药(11.29%)。在单个药物中,头孢曲松和苯妥英是最常见的严重不良反应的药物。成人受影响最大,185例(77.40%),与其他年龄组相比。以皮肤及皮下组织病变为主,系统器官分类(SOC)155(46.55%),以红斑和黄斑丘疹最为常见。11例Stevens-Johnson综合征,3例中毒性表皮坏死松解,均出现特异性不良反应。adr最多的是121类(50.60%)和100类(41.84%)。结论:本研究强调了印度中部地区严重不良反应的重大负担,强调了加强药物警戒和有针对性干预的必要性,特别是在成年人中。严重不良反应在女性和成人中的流行及其对住院的影响强调了谨慎用药的必要性,特别是在住院环境中。在资源有限的国家,对严重不良反应的了解和报道有限。研究结果将有助于制定战略,以形成未来的政策,促进更安全地使用药物。在我们的环境和低收入国家,adr报告不足也是一个令人关切的问题。因此,提高医护人员和患者对药品不良反应报告的认识,促进药物的安全使用是势在必行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probing the in-depth analysis of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions in a tertiary care hospital of Central India

Background

Serious Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) represent a critical challenge in contemporary healthcare, necessitating comprehensive investigation and analysis. Within Central India, where healthcare systems grapple with unique demographic, epidemiological, and infrastructural dynamics, understanding the landscape of serious ADRs is paramount.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate serious ADRs related to age, gender, most implicated class of drugs & single drug, hospital admission, most affected system organ classes, causality and outcome of reactions and fatalities.

Methods

This retrospective study analysed serious individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded from January 2016 to December 2019 at the Department of Pharmacology, Pt. JNM Medical College, Raipur (ADR monitoring centre), and submitted to the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India database using VigiFlow® for further process. ADRs were collected from Dr. BRAM Hospital and DKS Hospital and recorded using the standard suspected ADR reporting form (version 1.4). Cases were classified as serious if they met at least one criterion from the WHO-UMC scale, with some cases meeting multiple criteria. Causality was assessed using the WHO-UMC scale, ensuring patient and reporter confidentiality. Descriptive statistics such as number and frequency were used to analyse serious ADRs.

Results

A total of 762 ICSRs were entered into VigiFlow® during the study period, of which 239 (31.36 %) were classified as serious ADRs. The demographic distribution revealed a slight preponderance of females 125 (52.30 %) over males 113 (47.28 %). The hospital admissions due to ADRs were 57 (23.84 %). Antibiotics were the most commonly associated drug class (52.30 %), followed by Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (11.29 %). Among individual drugs, ceftriaxone and phenytoin were the most common drugs involved in serious ADRs. Adults were the most affected, 185 (77.40 %) compared to other age groups. The skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, system organ class (SOC)155 (46.55 %) was highly affected, while erythematous and maculopapular rashes were the most common. Eleven Stevens-Johnson syndrome cases and three toxic epidermal necrolysis cases, like specific ADRs, were also obtained. The most ADRs were probable 121 (50.60 %) and possible 100 (41.84 %) category.

Conclusion

This study highlights the significant burden of serious ADRs within Central India, emphasising the need for heightened pharmacovigilance and targeted interventions, especially among adults. The prevalence of serious ADRs in females and adults and the impact on hospitalisations emphasise the need for cautious drug use, especially in inpatient settings. Limited understanding and reporting exist regarding the profile of serious ADRs in resource-limited countries. The findings will contribute to developing strategies for shaping future policies to promote the safer use of medicines. The under-reporting of ADRs in our setting and low-income countries is also a concern. Therefore, it is imperative to raise awareness about ADR reporting by healthcare professionals as well as patients to promote the safe utilisation of drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信