高能量密度LMFP电池阴极的实用途径

IF 5.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Gerard Bree*, Jingyi Zhao, Veronika Majherova, Daniela Proprentner, Galo J. Paez Fajardo and Louis F. J. Piper*, 
{"title":"高能量密度LMFP电池阴极的实用途径","authors":"Gerard Bree*,&nbsp;Jingyi Zhao,&nbsp;Veronika Majherova,&nbsp;Daniela Proprentner,&nbsp;Galo J. Paez Fajardo and Louis F. J. Piper*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0620110.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The design of new lithium-ion battery cathode materials must balance many factors: performance, cost, manufacturability, safety, critical mineral usage, and geopolitical constraints. Recently, commercialized LiMn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (LMFP) materials offer good energy density and stability, low material cost, and excellent safety characteristics, avoiding the use of Co or Ni. Within this material set lies a wide variety of potential formulations (Mn/Fe ratio) exhibiting varied cathode properties and challenges. In this work, we assessed three commercially available LMFP materials with Mn content in the range of 60–80% in full cell format, confirming the role of the Mn/Fe ratio on specific capacity, energy density, and electrochemical stability. High Mn content increased the average discharge voltage while maintaining specific discharge capacity, with 80% Mn providing an 18% boost to initial gravimetric energy density over LFP. However, worse kinetics and increased capacity fade rate resulted in the reduction and eventual elimination of this energy density advantage after 100 cycles. A blend cathode (LMFP and LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O2, NMC811) was also evaluated, exhibiting characteristics of both material types. An initial 23% boost to energy density over LMFP alone was diluted following NMC-dominated degradation in early cycles, but enhanced capacity retention over NMC811 alone remained in long-term cycling. This work highlights the potential advantages of these newly commercialized materials while identifying outstanding challenges to widespread adoption and exploitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 7","pages":"3683–3689 3683–3689"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Pathways to Higher Energy Density LMFP Battery Cathodes\",\"authors\":\"Gerard Bree*,&nbsp;Jingyi Zhao,&nbsp;Veronika Majherova,&nbsp;Daniela Proprentner,&nbsp;Galo J. Paez Fajardo and Louis F. J. Piper*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c0620110.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The design of new lithium-ion battery cathode materials must balance many factors: performance, cost, manufacturability, safety, critical mineral usage, and geopolitical constraints. Recently, commercialized LiMn<sub><i>x</i></sub>Fe<sub>1–<i>x</i></sub>PO<sub>4</sub> (LMFP) materials offer good energy density and stability, low material cost, and excellent safety characteristics, avoiding the use of Co or Ni. Within this material set lies a wide variety of potential formulations (Mn/Fe ratio) exhibiting varied cathode properties and challenges. In this work, we assessed three commercially available LMFP materials with Mn content in the range of 60–80% in full cell format, confirming the role of the Mn/Fe ratio on specific capacity, energy density, and electrochemical stability. High Mn content increased the average discharge voltage while maintaining specific discharge capacity, with 80% Mn providing an 18% boost to initial gravimetric energy density over LFP. However, worse kinetics and increased capacity fade rate resulted in the reduction and eventual elimination of this energy density advantage after 100 cycles. A blend cathode (LMFP and LiNi<sub>0.8</sub>Mn<sub>0.1</sub>Co<sub>0.1</sub>O2, NMC811) was also evaluated, exhibiting characteristics of both material types. An initial 23% boost to energy density over LMFP alone was diluted following NMC-dominated degradation in early cycles, but enhanced capacity retention over NMC811 alone remained in long-term cycling. This work highlights the potential advantages of these newly commercialized materials while identifying outstanding challenges to widespread adoption and exploitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"volume\":\"39 7\",\"pages\":\"3683–3689 3683–3689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06201\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Fuels\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06201\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c06201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新型锂离子电池正极材料的设计必须平衡许多因素:性能、成本、可制造性、安全性、关键矿物的使用和地缘政治限制。最近,商业化的LiMnxFe1-xPO4 (LMFP)材料具有良好的能量密度和稳定性,材料成本低,安全性好,避免了使用Co或Ni。在这种材料中存在各种各样的潜在配方(Mn/Fe比),表现出不同的阴极特性和挑战。在这项工作中,我们评估了三种市售的LMFP材料,在全电池格式下,Mn含量在60-80%范围内,确认了Mn/Fe比例对比容量、能量密度和电化学稳定性的作用。高锰含量增加了平均放电电压,同时保持了特定的放电容量,与LFP相比,80%锰的初始重量能量密度提高了18%。然而,在100次循环后,更差的动力学和增加的容量衰减率导致这种能量密度优势的减少和最终消除。同时对LMFP和LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2、NMC811共混阴极进行了评价,显示了两种材料类型的特性。在早期循环中,与单独使用LMFP相比,能量密度提高了23%,但在nmc主导的降解过程中,能量密度的提高被稀释了,但在长期循环中,与单独使用NMC811相比,能量保持能力的提高仍然存在。这项工作强调了这些新商业化材料的潜在优势,同时确定了广泛采用和开发的突出挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical Pathways to Higher Energy Density LMFP Battery Cathodes

The design of new lithium-ion battery cathode materials must balance many factors: performance, cost, manufacturability, safety, critical mineral usage, and geopolitical constraints. Recently, commercialized LiMnxFe1–xPO4 (LMFP) materials offer good energy density and stability, low material cost, and excellent safety characteristics, avoiding the use of Co or Ni. Within this material set lies a wide variety of potential formulations (Mn/Fe ratio) exhibiting varied cathode properties and challenges. In this work, we assessed three commercially available LMFP materials with Mn content in the range of 60–80% in full cell format, confirming the role of the Mn/Fe ratio on specific capacity, energy density, and electrochemical stability. High Mn content increased the average discharge voltage while maintaining specific discharge capacity, with 80% Mn providing an 18% boost to initial gravimetric energy density over LFP. However, worse kinetics and increased capacity fade rate resulted in the reduction and eventual elimination of this energy density advantage after 100 cycles. A blend cathode (LMFP and LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2, NMC811) was also evaluated, exhibiting characteristics of both material types. An initial 23% boost to energy density over LMFP alone was diluted following NMC-dominated degradation in early cycles, but enhanced capacity retention over NMC811 alone remained in long-term cycling. This work highlights the potential advantages of these newly commercialized materials while identifying outstanding challenges to widespread adoption and exploitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信