脑深部刺激程序个性化的新兴技术。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brendan Santyr, Alexandre Boutet, Afis Ajala, Jürgen Germann, Jianwei Qiu, Alfonso Fasano, Andres M Lozano, Walter Kucharczyk
{"title":"脑深部刺激程序个性化的新兴技术。","authors":"Brendan Santyr, Alexandre Boutet, Afis Ajala, Jürgen Germann, Jianwei Qiu, Alfonso Fasano, Andres M Lozano, Walter Kucharczyk","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2025.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on applying carefully titrated therapeutic stimulation at specific targets. Once implanted, the electrical stimulation parameters at each electrode contact can be modified. Iteratively adjusting the stimulation parameters enables testing for the optimal stimulation settings. Due to the large parameter space, the currently employed empirical testing of individual parameters based on acute clinical response is not sustainable. Within the constraints of short clinical visits, optimization is particularly challenging when clinical features lack immediate feedback, as seen in DBS for dystonia and depression and with the cognitive and axial side effects of DBS for Parkinson's disease. A personalized approach to stimulation parameter selection is desirable as the increasing complexity of modern DBS devices also expands the number of available parameters. This review describes three emerging imaging and electrophysiological methods of personalizing DBS programming. Normative connectome-base stimulation utilizes large datasets of normal or disease-matched connectivity imaging. The stimulation location for an individual patient can then be varied to engage regions associated with optimal connectivity. Electrophysiology-guided open- and closed-loop stimulation capitalizes on the electrophysiological recording capabilities of modern implanted devices to individualize stimulation parameters based on biomarkers of success or symptom onset. Finally, individual functional MRI (fMRI)-based approaches use fMRI during active stimulation to identify parameters resulting in characteristic patterns of functional engagement associated with long-term treatment response. Each method provides different but complementary information, and maximizing treatment efficacy likely requires a combined approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":56134,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emerging Techniques for the Personalization of Deep Brain Stimulation Programming.\",\"authors\":\"Brendan Santyr, Alexandre Boutet, Afis Ajala, Jürgen Germann, Jianwei Qiu, Alfonso Fasano, Andres M Lozano, Walter Kucharczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cjn.2025.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on applying carefully titrated therapeutic stimulation at specific targets. Once implanted, the electrical stimulation parameters at each electrode contact can be modified. Iteratively adjusting the stimulation parameters enables testing for the optimal stimulation settings. Due to the large parameter space, the currently employed empirical testing of individual parameters based on acute clinical response is not sustainable. Within the constraints of short clinical visits, optimization is particularly challenging when clinical features lack immediate feedback, as seen in DBS for dystonia and depression and with the cognitive and axial side effects of DBS for Parkinson's disease. A personalized approach to stimulation parameter selection is desirable as the increasing complexity of modern DBS devices also expands the number of available parameters. This review describes three emerging imaging and electrophysiological methods of personalizing DBS programming. Normative connectome-base stimulation utilizes large datasets of normal or disease-matched connectivity imaging. The stimulation location for an individual patient can then be varied to engage regions associated with optimal connectivity. Electrophysiology-guided open- and closed-loop stimulation capitalizes on the electrophysiological recording capabilities of modern implanted devices to individualize stimulation parameters based on biomarkers of success or symptom onset. Finally, individual functional MRI (fMRI)-based approaches use fMRI during active stimulation to identify parameters resulting in characteristic patterns of functional engagement associated with long-term treatment response. Each method provides different but complementary information, and maximizing treatment efficacy likely requires a combined approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.29\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2025.29","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑深部刺激(DBS)的成功依赖于在特定目标上应用仔细滴定的治疗性刺激。一旦植入,每个电极接触处的电刺激参数都可以修改。通过反复调整增产参数,可以测试出最佳的增产设置。由于参数空间大,目前采用的基于急性临床反应的单个参数的实证检验是不可持续的。在短期临床访问的限制下,当临床特征缺乏即时反馈时,优化尤其具有挑战性,如DBS治疗肌张力障碍和抑郁症以及DBS治疗帕金森病的认知和轴向副作用。随着现代DBS设备日益复杂,可用参数的数量也越来越多,因此需要个性化的增产参数选择方法。本文综述了三种新兴的成像和电生理方法来个性化DBS编程。规范的连接体基础刺激利用正常或疾病匹配的连接成像的大数据集。然后,个体患者的刺激位置可以改变,以参与与最佳连接相关的区域。电生理引导的开环和闭环刺激利用了现代植入设备的电生理记录能力,根据成功或症状发作的生物标志物来个性化刺激参数。最后,基于个体功能MRI (fMRI)的方法在主动刺激期间使用fMRI来识别导致与长期治疗反应相关的功能参与特征模式的参数。每种方法提供不同但互补的信息,最大限度地提高治疗效果可能需要综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emerging Techniques for the Personalization of Deep Brain Stimulation Programming.

The success of deep brain stimulation (DBS) relies on applying carefully titrated therapeutic stimulation at specific targets. Once implanted, the electrical stimulation parameters at each electrode contact can be modified. Iteratively adjusting the stimulation parameters enables testing for the optimal stimulation settings. Due to the large parameter space, the currently employed empirical testing of individual parameters based on acute clinical response is not sustainable. Within the constraints of short clinical visits, optimization is particularly challenging when clinical features lack immediate feedback, as seen in DBS for dystonia and depression and with the cognitive and axial side effects of DBS for Parkinson's disease. A personalized approach to stimulation parameter selection is desirable as the increasing complexity of modern DBS devices also expands the number of available parameters. This review describes three emerging imaging and electrophysiological methods of personalizing DBS programming. Normative connectome-base stimulation utilizes large datasets of normal or disease-matched connectivity imaging. The stimulation location for an individual patient can then be varied to engage regions associated with optimal connectivity. Electrophysiology-guided open- and closed-loop stimulation capitalizes on the electrophysiological recording capabilities of modern implanted devices to individualize stimulation parameters based on biomarkers of success or symptom onset. Finally, individual functional MRI (fMRI)-based approaches use fMRI during active stimulation to identify parameters resulting in characteristic patterns of functional engagement associated with long-term treatment response. Each method provides different but complementary information, and maximizing treatment efficacy likely requires a combined approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences is the official publication of the four member societies of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation -- Canadian Neurological Society (CNS), Canadian Association of Child Neurology (CACN), Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS), Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists (CSCN). The Journal is a widely circulated internationally recognized medical journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles. The Journal is published in January, March, May, July, September, and November in an online only format. The first Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences (the Journal) was published in 1974 in Winnipeg. In 1981, the Journal became the official publication of the member societies of the CNSF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信