微创青光眼手术(MIGS)治疗原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性闭角型青光眼的疗效和并发症:一项系统综述和meta分析。

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S505856
Benjamin Paik, Chun Hau Chua, Leonard W Yip, Vivien C H Yip
{"title":"微创青光眼手术(MIGS)治疗原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性闭角型青光眼的疗效和并发症:一项系统综述和meta分析。","authors":"Benjamin Paik, Chun Hau Chua, Leonard W Yip, Vivien C H Yip","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S505856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To analyse the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) in lowering IOP and medication burden in primary angle closure (PAC) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>MIGS is off-label in angle closure, as implantation of the device is difficult when there is iridotrabecular contact. However, access to the trabecular meshwork may be established with cataract removal or goniosynechiolysis. While MIGS can be performed in the same setting as phacoemulsification (MIGS-phaco), it remains controversial if the combined procedure confers a significant advantage over standalone phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies reporting outcomes of MIGS in PAC or PACG. Our main outcome measures were IOP-lowering from baseline and medication reduction, at 1 year. We performed meta-analyses of these outcomes using weighted mean differences (WMD) under random-effects models. Our secondary outcome was complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies comprising 875 patients were included in our review, from which 15 (590 patients) were included in meta-analysis. MIGS (with and without phacoemulsification) demonstrated a weighted mean reduction in IOP of 7.71 mmHg (95% CI: 5.16-10.26), and in medication of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.17-1.96), both at 1 year. Subgroup analyses revealed the superiority of AIT over endoCPG and iStent in both IOP-lowering (p<0.02) and medication burden (p<0.01). Comparison analysis between MIGS-phaco vs standalone phacoemulsification revealed superiority of MIGS-phaco in reducing medication burden (WMD 0.59, 95% CI: -0.04-1.22) and to a limited extent, IOP-lowering (WMD 1.22; 95% CI: -0.96-3.39) up till 1 year. Overall complication rate was 141/875 (16%) after excluding transient self-resolving hyphema.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIGS brings about sustained reduction in IOP and medication burden with favourable side-effect profile in angle closure eyes. MIGS-phaco may be superior to standalone phacoemulsification. MIGS should be thoroughly considered for mild-moderate PACG with coexisting cataract before pursuing more invasive surgical approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"483-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes and Complications of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries (MIGS) in Primary Angle Closure and Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Paik, Chun Hau Chua, Leonard W Yip, Vivien C H Yip\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S505856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Topic: </strong>To analyse the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) in lowering IOP and medication burden in primary angle closure (PAC) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>MIGS is off-label in angle closure, as implantation of the device is difficult when there is iridotrabecular contact. However, access to the trabecular meshwork may be established with cataract removal or goniosynechiolysis. While MIGS can be performed in the same setting as phacoemulsification (MIGS-phaco), it remains controversial if the combined procedure confers a significant advantage over standalone phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies reporting outcomes of MIGS in PAC or PACG. Our main outcome measures were IOP-lowering from baseline and medication reduction, at 1 year. We performed meta-analyses of these outcomes using weighted mean differences (WMD) under random-effects models. Our secondary outcome was complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies comprising 875 patients were included in our review, from which 15 (590 patients) were included in meta-analysis. MIGS (with and without phacoemulsification) demonstrated a weighted mean reduction in IOP of 7.71 mmHg (95% CI: 5.16-10.26), and in medication of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.17-1.96), both at 1 year. Subgroup analyses revealed the superiority of AIT over endoCPG and iStent in both IOP-lowering (p<0.02) and medication burden (p<0.01). Comparison analysis between MIGS-phaco vs standalone phacoemulsification revealed superiority of MIGS-phaco in reducing medication burden (WMD 0.59, 95% CI: -0.04-1.22) and to a limited extent, IOP-lowering (WMD 1.22; 95% CI: -0.96-3.39) up till 1 year. Overall complication rate was 141/875 (16%) after excluding transient self-resolving hyphema.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MIGS brings about sustained reduction in IOP and medication burden with favourable side-effect profile in angle closure eyes. MIGS-phaco may be superior to standalone phacoemulsification. MIGS should be thoroughly considered for mild-moderate PACG with coexisting cataract before pursuing more invasive surgical approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"483-506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11830760/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S505856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S505856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主题:分析微创青光眼手术(MIGS)对原发性闭角型青光眼(PAC)和原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)患者降低IOP和药物负担的安全性和有效性。临床相关性:MIGS在闭合角度上是不符合说明书的,因为当虹膜小梁接触时,植入装置是困难的。然而,小梁网的通路可以通过白内障摘除或关节松解术来建立。虽然MIGS可以在与超声乳化(MIGS-phaco)相同的环境下进行,但如果联合手术比单独的超声乳化手术具有显着优势,则仍然存在争议。方法:我们在MEDLINE, EMBASE和Cochrane文库中进行了系统搜索,以报告PAC或PACG中MIGS的结果。我们的主要结局指标是在1年时,从基线开始降低iops和减少用药。我们在随机效应模型下使用加权平均差异(WMD)对这些结果进行了荟萃分析。我们的次要结果是并发症发生率。结果:我们的综述纳入了23项研究,共875例患者,其中15例(590例)纳入meta分析。MIGS(有和没有超声乳化术)显示,1年的IOP加权平均降低7.71 mmHg (95% CI: 5.16-10.26),药物治疗的IOP加权平均降低1.57 mmHg (95% CI: 1.17-1.96)。亚组分析显示,AIT在降低眼压方面均优于endoCPG和iStent。结论:MIGS在闭角眼中可持续降低眼压,减轻药物负担,副作用较好。migs超声可能优于独立超声乳化术。轻度至中度PACG合并白内障的患者,在采取更具侵入性的手术方法前,应充分考虑MIGS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes and Complications of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries (MIGS) in Primary Angle Closure and Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Topic: To analyse the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) in lowering IOP and medication burden in primary angle closure (PAC) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).

Clinical relevance: MIGS is off-label in angle closure, as implantation of the device is difficult when there is iridotrabecular contact. However, access to the trabecular meshwork may be established with cataract removal or goniosynechiolysis. While MIGS can be performed in the same setting as phacoemulsification (MIGS-phaco), it remains controversial if the combined procedure confers a significant advantage over standalone phacoemulsification.

Methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies reporting outcomes of MIGS in PAC or PACG. Our main outcome measures were IOP-lowering from baseline and medication reduction, at 1 year. We performed meta-analyses of these outcomes using weighted mean differences (WMD) under random-effects models. Our secondary outcome was complication rate.

Results: Twenty-three studies comprising 875 patients were included in our review, from which 15 (590 patients) were included in meta-analysis. MIGS (with and without phacoemulsification) demonstrated a weighted mean reduction in IOP of 7.71 mmHg (95% CI: 5.16-10.26), and in medication of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.17-1.96), both at 1 year. Subgroup analyses revealed the superiority of AIT over endoCPG and iStent in both IOP-lowering (p<0.02) and medication burden (p<0.01). Comparison analysis between MIGS-phaco vs standalone phacoemulsification revealed superiority of MIGS-phaco in reducing medication burden (WMD 0.59, 95% CI: -0.04-1.22) and to a limited extent, IOP-lowering (WMD 1.22; 95% CI: -0.96-3.39) up till 1 year. Overall complication rate was 141/875 (16%) after excluding transient self-resolving hyphema.

Conclusion: MIGS brings about sustained reduction in IOP and medication burden with favourable side-effect profile in angle closure eyes. MIGS-phaco may be superior to standalone phacoemulsification. MIGS should be thoroughly considered for mild-moderate PACG with coexisting cataract before pursuing more invasive surgical approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信