Jian Shiun Tan, Anantharaman Vathsala, Hersharan Kaur Sran, Matthew Ross D'Costa, Zi Yun Chang, Emmett Tsz Yeung Wong
{"title":"肾移植受者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的认知和态度:一项单中心研究","authors":"Jian Shiun Tan, Anantharaman Vathsala, Hersharan Kaur Sran, Matthew Ross D'Costa, Zi Yun Chang, Emmett Tsz Yeung Wong","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination has been shown to reduce hospitalisation and mortality rates in kidney transplant recipients, but vaccine hesitancy remains a concern. We surveyed kidney transplant recipients in a single centre to examine their perceptions and attitudes towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of kidney transplant recipients was conducted between June 2021 and August 2021. Questionnaire responses collected included demographic data, intention to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and factors related to vaccine acceptance or hesitance. Predictors and reasons for vaccine acceptance were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the sampled cohort of 313 respondents, the vaccine acceptance rate was 75%; 61% of the respondents were aged 51-70 years, and 31% had transplant vintages of 10-20 years. In a multivariable model, transplant physicians' recommendation (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-7.1, P < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, P = 0.003) and transplant vintage of <10 years (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5, P = 0.01) were predictors of vaccine acceptance. Recipients' perceptions that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination confers protection and their trust in the government and health authorities on vaccine efficacy and safety were reasons for vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the effects of vaccination on allograft function and the safety and efficacy of vaccines were reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Assurance from transplant physicians played an important role in increasing vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high level of knowledge and trust in the doctor-patient relationship remain critical for kidney transplant recipients to improve vaccine acceptance. Continued efforts are required to address concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and attitudes of kidney transplant recipients towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a single-centre study.\",\"authors\":\"Jian Shiun Tan, Anantharaman Vathsala, Hersharan Kaur Sran, Matthew Ross D'Costa, Zi Yun Chang, Emmett Tsz Yeung Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination has been shown to reduce hospitalisation and mortality rates in kidney transplant recipients, but vaccine hesitancy remains a concern. We surveyed kidney transplant recipients in a single centre to examine their perceptions and attitudes towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of kidney transplant recipients was conducted between June 2021 and August 2021. Questionnaire responses collected included demographic data, intention to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and factors related to vaccine acceptance or hesitance. Predictors and reasons for vaccine acceptance were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the sampled cohort of 313 respondents, the vaccine acceptance rate was 75%; 61% of the respondents were aged 51-70 years, and 31% had transplant vintages of 10-20 years. In a multivariable model, transplant physicians' recommendation (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-7.1, P < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, P = 0.003) and transplant vintage of <10 years (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5, P = 0.01) were predictors of vaccine acceptance. Recipients' perceptions that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination confers protection and their trust in the government and health authorities on vaccine efficacy and safety were reasons for vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the effects of vaccination on allograft function and the safety and efficacy of vaccines were reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Assurance from transplant physicians played an important role in increasing vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high level of knowledge and trust in the doctor-patient relationship remain critical for kidney transplant recipients to improve vaccine acceptance. Continued efforts are required to address concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:肾移植受者患2019冠状病毒病严重后果的风险增加。严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种已被证明可以降低肾移植受者的住院率和死亡率,但疫苗犹豫仍然是一个问题。我们在单一中心调查了肾移植受者,以了解他们对SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种的看法和态度。方法:在2021年6月至2021年8月期间对肾移植受者进行横断面调查。收集的问卷回答包括人口统计数据、接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗的意向以及疫苗接受或犹豫的相关因素。分析了疫苗接受的预测因素和原因。结果:在313名应答者的抽样队列中,疫苗接受率为75%;61%的受访者年龄在51-70岁之间,31%的人移植年份为10-20年。在一个多变量模型中,移植医生的推荐(比值比[OR] 4.1, 95%置信区间[CI] 2.4-7.1, P < 0.001)、男性(比值比[OR] 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, P = 0.003)和移植年份。结论:对医患关系的高度了解和信任仍然是肾移植受者提高疫苗接受度的关键。需要继续努力解决对这一人群中疫苗效力和安全性的关切。
Perceptions and attitudes of kidney transplant recipients towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a single-centre study.
Introduction: Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk of severe outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination has been shown to reduce hospitalisation and mortality rates in kidney transplant recipients, but vaccine hesitancy remains a concern. We surveyed kidney transplant recipients in a single centre to examine their perceptions and attitudes towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey of kidney transplant recipients was conducted between June 2021 and August 2021. Questionnaire responses collected included demographic data, intention to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and factors related to vaccine acceptance or hesitance. Predictors and reasons for vaccine acceptance were analysed.
Results: In the sampled cohort of 313 respondents, the vaccine acceptance rate was 75%; 61% of the respondents were aged 51-70 years, and 31% had transplant vintages of 10-20 years. In a multivariable model, transplant physicians' recommendation (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-7.1, P < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, P = 0.003) and transplant vintage of <10 years (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5, P = 0.01) were predictors of vaccine acceptance. Recipients' perceptions that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination confers protection and their trust in the government and health authorities on vaccine efficacy and safety were reasons for vaccine acceptance, while concerns about the effects of vaccination on allograft function and the safety and efficacy of vaccines were reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Assurance from transplant physicians played an important role in increasing vaccine acceptance.
Conclusion: A high level of knowledge and trust in the doctor-patient relationship remain critical for kidney transplant recipients to improve vaccine acceptance. Continued efforts are required to address concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety in this population.