基于团队的学习中准备就绪保证过程的修改探讨。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1152/advan.00062.2024
Tadd Farmer, Michael C Johnson, Jorin D Larsen, Lance E Davidson
{"title":"基于团队的学习中准备就绪保证过程的修改探讨。","authors":"Tadd Farmer, Michael C Johnson, Jorin D Larsen, Lance E Davidson","doi":"10.1152/advan.00062.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning instructional strategy shown to improve student learning in large-enrollment courses. Although early implementations of TBL proved generally effective in an undergraduate exercise physiology course that delivered an online individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) before class, the instructor reported student dissatisfaction with the use of identical questions in the team readiness assurance test (tRAT) in class. This study sought to improve the student experience in this course by including different but related question sets for the online iRAT and in-class tRAT. Two sections of an upper-level undergraduate exercise physiology course received both the traditional and modified tRAT, alternating approaches with each course unit. This crossover research design exposed more students to the proposed modification and provided more student perspectives than would be collected through other research designs. An independent-sample <i>t</i> test indicated that the modified TBL format made no difference on performance on course unit exams (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, student survey qualitative data revealed that 69% of students preferred the modified tRAT method to the traditional form. Student responses on the benefits of the modification, represented here as major themes in the analysis, included better content interaction, use of higher-order thinking, and more effective social experience with teams. Although this study showed that different sets of questions for the individual and team quizzes improved the experience but not performance for the majority of students, some students suggested changes to the modification that could further improve the student experience with TBL.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In an exercise physiology course using an already-modified team-based learning approach, this crossover-designed pedagogy trial investigated the learning impact and student experience of introducing different (but related) questions in the in-class team readiness assurance test (tRAT) compared to those given in the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) that students completed online before class. This approach may be of interest for instructors experimenting with partially flipped classroom designs in a team-based context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"366-373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring a modification to the readiness assurance process in team-based learning.\",\"authors\":\"Tadd Farmer, Michael C Johnson, Jorin D Larsen, Lance E Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00062.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning instructional strategy shown to improve student learning in large-enrollment courses. Although early implementations of TBL proved generally effective in an undergraduate exercise physiology course that delivered an online individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) before class, the instructor reported student dissatisfaction with the use of identical questions in the team readiness assurance test (tRAT) in class. This study sought to improve the student experience in this course by including different but related question sets for the online iRAT and in-class tRAT. Two sections of an upper-level undergraduate exercise physiology course received both the traditional and modified tRAT, alternating approaches with each course unit. This crossover research design exposed more students to the proposed modification and provided more student perspectives than would be collected through other research designs. An independent-sample <i>t</i> test indicated that the modified TBL format made no difference on performance on course unit exams (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, student survey qualitative data revealed that 69% of students preferred the modified tRAT method to the traditional form. Student responses on the benefits of the modification, represented here as major themes in the analysis, included better content interaction, use of higher-order thinking, and more effective social experience with teams. Although this study showed that different sets of questions for the individual and team quizzes improved the experience but not performance for the majority of students, some students suggested changes to the modification that could further improve the student experience with TBL.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In an exercise physiology course using an already-modified team-based learning approach, this crossover-designed pedagogy trial investigated the learning impact and student experience of introducing different (but related) questions in the in-class team readiness assurance test (tRAT) compared to those given in the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) that students completed online before class. This approach may be of interest for instructors experimenting with partially flipped classroom designs in a team-based context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"366-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00062.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00062.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种主动学习的教学策略,在大招生课程中被证明可以提高学生的学习水平。尽管在一门本科运动生理学课程中,TBL的早期实施被证明是有效的,该课程在课前提供了在线个人准备保证测试(iRAT),但教师报告说,学生对课堂上团队准备保证测试(tRAT)中使用相同的问题不满意。本研究旨在通过为在线iRAT和课堂tRAT提供不同但相关的问题集来改善学生在本课程中的体验。一门高级本科运动生理学课程的两个部分分别接受了传统的和改进的tRAT,每个课程单元交替使用。与其他研究设计相比,这种交叉研究设计使更多的学生接触到拟议的修改,并提供了更多的学生观点。独立样本t检验表明,修改后的TBL格式对课程单元考试的成绩没有影响(p < 0.05)。然而,学生调查定性数据显示,69%的学生更喜欢改进的tRAT方法,而不是传统的形式。学生对修改带来的好处的反应(下文将作为分析的主要主题)包括更好的内容互动、更高层次思维的使用以及更有效的团队社交体验。虽然本研究表明,对于大多数学生来说,不同的个人和团队测验问题集改善了体验,但没有改善表现,一些学生建议修改修改,以进一步改善学生对TBL的体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring a modification to the readiness assurance process in team-based learning.

Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning instructional strategy shown to improve student learning in large-enrollment courses. Although early implementations of TBL proved generally effective in an undergraduate exercise physiology course that delivered an online individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) before class, the instructor reported student dissatisfaction with the use of identical questions in the team readiness assurance test (tRAT) in class. This study sought to improve the student experience in this course by including different but related question sets for the online iRAT and in-class tRAT. Two sections of an upper-level undergraduate exercise physiology course received both the traditional and modified tRAT, alternating approaches with each course unit. This crossover research design exposed more students to the proposed modification and provided more student perspectives than would be collected through other research designs. An independent-sample t test indicated that the modified TBL format made no difference on performance on course unit exams (P > 0.05). However, student survey qualitative data revealed that 69% of students preferred the modified tRAT method to the traditional form. Student responses on the benefits of the modification, represented here as major themes in the analysis, included better content interaction, use of higher-order thinking, and more effective social experience with teams. Although this study showed that different sets of questions for the individual and team quizzes improved the experience but not performance for the majority of students, some students suggested changes to the modification that could further improve the student experience with TBL.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In an exercise physiology course using an already-modified team-based learning approach, this crossover-designed pedagogy trial investigated the learning impact and student experience of introducing different (but related) questions in the in-class team readiness assurance test (tRAT) compared to those given in the individual readiness assurance test (iRAT) that students completed online before class. This approach may be of interest for instructors experimenting with partially flipped classroom designs in a team-based context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信