James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson
{"title":"通过运动单位动作电位和手刺激运动测试预测住院康复期间四肢瘫痪患者的运动恢复。","authors":"James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Diagnostic Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10<sup>-6</sup>) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing.\",\"authors\":\"James R Wilson, David Y Balser, Gregory A Nemunaitis, Kim D Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Diagnostic Study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10<sup>-6</sup>) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2452687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:诊断性研究。目的:外伤性颈脊髓损伤致四肢瘫痪患者的早期康复预后可进一步指导康复和手术干预。本研究评估了使用刺激手动运动测试(SMMT)和针肌电图(EMG)预测急性住院康复期间力量增加的可行性和潜力。环境:单一学术住院康复设施(IRF)。方法:体力弱肌(MMT)测试结果:SMMT和运动单位动作电位(MUAP)测试数据缺失率分别为9.5%和24%。存在MUAP的4周MMT变化(P = 3.89×10-6)和SMMT改善(P = 0.0156)的Wilcoxon秩和检验具有统计学意义,但SMMT变化与MMT变化的Spearman秩相关系数无统计学意义(P = 0.817)。MUAP和SMMT联合预测MMT改善的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为0.732,最佳灵敏度为41.9% (95% CI 25.8%至58.1%),特异性为90.3% (95% CI 84.5%至96.1%)。该模型优于单变量模型。结论:通过对试验管理的务实妥协来减少损耗,在急性康复期间测量自发性MUAP的存在和SMMT的改善在预测4周内运动改善方面仍有价值。
Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing.
Study design: Diagnostic Study.
Objectives: Early prognosis for recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury resulting in tetraplegia may further guide rehabilitation and surgical interventions. This study assesses the feasibility and potential of using stimulated manual motor testing (SMMT) and needle electromyography (EMG) to predict gains in strength during acute inpatient rehabilitation.
Setting: Single academic inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).
Methods: Muscles with weak strength (manual motor test (MMT) <3) were assessed for lower motor neuron (LMN) integrity by SMMT using surface electrodes. Muscles without clinical strength (MMT=0) using SMMT and EMG. Correlations and prognostic models assessed the association and prediction of these measures with improvement in MMT values over 4 weeks.
Results: The missing data rate for SMMT and motor unit action potential (MUAP) testing was 9.5% and 24%, respectively. Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests of 4-week MMT changes with MUAP presence (P = 3.89×10-6) and SMMT improvement (P = 0.0156) were statistically significant, but the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient of changes in SMMT with MMT changes was not (P = 0.817). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) Area Under the Curve (AUC) for combined MUAP and SMMT predictors of MMT improvement was 0.732, with an optimal sensitivity of 41.9% (95% CI 25.8% to 58.1%) and specificity of 90.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 96.1%). This model was superior to univariate models.
Conclusions: With pragmatic compromises in test administration to reduce attrition, measuring the presence of voluntary MUAP and improvement in SMMT during acute rehabilitation retains value in predicting motor improvement in 4 weeks.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.