在无创呼吸支持下喂养婴儿:在一个学术医疗中心的实践。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Carolyn K Barnes, Kit N Simpson, Janina Wilmskoetter, Mary Dooley, Heather S Bonilha
{"title":"在无创呼吸支持下喂养婴儿:在一个学术医疗中心的实践。","authors":"Carolyn K Barnes, Kit N Simpson, Janina Wilmskoetter, Mary Dooley, Heather S Bonilha","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) are often orally fed, although data supporting the safety and efficacy of this practice are limited. This study aimed to identify the rate of this practice, the amount of support received during oral feeding, and characteristics of infants orally fed during NRS use; describe feeding expert involvement; and assess change from before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective electronic health record data from one children's hospital were extracted and manually reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for 201 infants who required NRS during hospitalization in 2019 (<i>n</i> = 100) and 2022 (<i>n</i> = 101) were included, of which 91 (45.3%) were orally fed during NRS use. Of these, 33 were fed on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with a mean flow rate of 2.75 L per minute (<i>SD</i> = 2.2, <i>Mdn</i> = 2 [min-max: 2-14]) and mean fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) of 0.47 (<i>SD</i> = 0.31, <i>Mdn</i> = 0.30 [min-max: 0.21-1.0]). Thirty-seven feeding specialist consults were placed for infants fed during NRS use. Factors increasing odds of oral feeding during NRS use included not having a dysphagia or feeding difficulty diagnosis. Infants admitted during 2022 were more likely to have a respiratory diagnosis than in 2019 and were more likely to be orally fed during HFNC (50.0% [<i>n</i> = 25/50] in 2022 vs. 20.5% [<i>n</i> = 8/39] in 2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that feeding infants on NRS is common, that some infants are more likely to be orally fed than others, and that feeding experts are rarely consulted in this population despite limited safety and efficacy data related to this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"617-632"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feeding Infants on Noninvasive Respiratory Support: Practice at One Academic Medical Center.\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn K Barnes, Kit N Simpson, Janina Wilmskoetter, Mary Dooley, Heather S Bonilha\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) are often orally fed, although data supporting the safety and efficacy of this practice are limited. This study aimed to identify the rate of this practice, the amount of support received during oral feeding, and characteristics of infants orally fed during NRS use; describe feeding expert involvement; and assess change from before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective electronic health record data from one children's hospital were extracted and manually reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for 201 infants who required NRS during hospitalization in 2019 (<i>n</i> = 100) and 2022 (<i>n</i> = 101) were included, of which 91 (45.3%) were orally fed during NRS use. Of these, 33 were fed on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with a mean flow rate of 2.75 L per minute (<i>SD</i> = 2.2, <i>Mdn</i> = 2 [min-max: 2-14]) and mean fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) of 0.47 (<i>SD</i> = 0.31, <i>Mdn</i> = 0.30 [min-max: 0.21-1.0]). Thirty-seven feeding specialist consults were placed for infants fed during NRS use. Factors increasing odds of oral feeding during NRS use included not having a dysphagia or feeding difficulty diagnosis. Infants admitted during 2022 were more likely to have a respiratory diagnosis than in 2019 and were more likely to be orally fed during HFNC (50.0% [<i>n</i> = 25/50] in 2022 vs. 20.5% [<i>n</i> = 8/39] in 2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that feeding infants on NRS is common, that some infants are more likely to be orally fed than others, and that feeding experts are rarely consulted in this population despite limited safety and efficacy data related to this practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"617-632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903017/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:需要无创呼吸支持(NRS)的婴儿通常口服喂养,尽管支持这种做法的安全性和有效性的数据有限。本研究旨在确定这种做法的比率,在口服喂养期间获得的支持量,以及在使用NRS期间口服喂养的婴儿的特征;描述喂养专家的参与;并评估COVID-19大流行发生前后的变化。方法:提取某儿童医院的回顾性电子病历资料,进行人工复核。结果:纳入2019年和2022年住院期间需要NRS的201例婴儿(n = 100)和2022年住院期间需要NRS的201例婴儿(n = 101)的结果,其中91例(45.3%)在使用NRS期间口服喂养。其中33只大流量鼻插管(HFNC),平均流量为2.75 L / min (SD = 2.2, Mdn = 2 [min-max: 2-14]),平均吸入氧分数(FiO2)为0.47 (SD = 0.31, Mdn = 0.30 [min-max: 0.21-1.0])。37名喂养专家咨询了在NRS使用期间喂养的婴儿。在NRS使用期间增加口服喂养几率的因素包括没有吞咽困难或喂养困难的诊断。与2019年相比,2022年入院的婴儿更有可能被诊断为呼吸道疾病,并且在HFNC期间更有可能被口服喂养(2022年为50.0% [n = 25/50], 2019年为20.5% [n = 8/39])。结论:这些结果表明,用NRS喂养婴儿是常见的,一些婴儿比其他婴儿更有可能口服喂养,尽管与这种做法相关的安全性和有效性数据有限,但在这一人群中很少咨询喂养专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feeding Infants on Noninvasive Respiratory Support: Practice at One Academic Medical Center.

Purpose: Infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) are often orally fed, although data supporting the safety and efficacy of this practice are limited. This study aimed to identify the rate of this practice, the amount of support received during oral feeding, and characteristics of infants orally fed during NRS use; describe feeding expert involvement; and assess change from before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: Retrospective electronic health record data from one children's hospital were extracted and manually reviewed.

Results: Results for 201 infants who required NRS during hospitalization in 2019 (n = 100) and 2022 (n = 101) were included, of which 91 (45.3%) were orally fed during NRS use. Of these, 33 were fed on high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with a mean flow rate of 2.75 L per minute (SD = 2.2, Mdn = 2 [min-max: 2-14]) and mean fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.47 (SD = 0.31, Mdn = 0.30 [min-max: 0.21-1.0]). Thirty-seven feeding specialist consults were placed for infants fed during NRS use. Factors increasing odds of oral feeding during NRS use included not having a dysphagia or feeding difficulty diagnosis. Infants admitted during 2022 were more likely to have a respiratory diagnosis than in 2019 and were more likely to be orally fed during HFNC (50.0% [n = 25/50] in 2022 vs. 20.5% [n = 8/39] in 2019).

Conclusion: These results suggest that feeding infants on NRS is common, that some infants are more likely to be orally fed than others, and that feeding experts are rarely consulted in this population despite limited safety and efficacy data related to this practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信