{"title":"小儿耳内异物清除手术方案的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Dilan Prasad, Glenn Isaacson","doi":"10.1002/lary.32073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3-Retrospective review.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of a Protocol for In-Office Pediatric Aural Foreign Body Removal.\",\"authors\":\"Dilan Prasad, Glenn Isaacson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3-Retrospective review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:研究一种分步方案在儿科人群中耳异物(FB)办公室移除术的安全性和有效性。方法:所有到学术儿科门诊就诊的儿童都从计算机收集的办公室记录和手术报告中进行识别。FB的移除以标准的方式进行,包括:(1)术前讨论,共同决策;(2)仰卧位约束,由训练过的第二个人扶着头部;(3)使用手术显微镜和器械去除FB。如果需要在镇静或全身麻醉下切除,则认为手术失败。结果:428例患儿共发现447例(耳),其中19例为双侧FBs。201/428(47%)患儿曾在其他地方尝试过FB移除术。431/447(96.4%)的FBs在办公室成功提取。16/447(3.6%)的FBs在手术室被移除。在431例成功切除的病例中,有2例患者出现了轻微的并发症(耳道撕裂)。没有孩子遭受更严重的并发症。切除失败组更有可能有记录的神经发育障碍(4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001)。结论:该方案导致高成功率的FB去除,即使是以前的尝试失败的儿童。在这22年的研究中,包括患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍的儿童,没有出现明显的耳部损伤。这种方法应该被在办公室照顾儿童的耳鼻喉科医生考虑。证据等级:3级回顾性审查。
Safety and Efficacy of a Protocol for In-Office Pediatric Aural Foreign Body Removal.
Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.
Methods: All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.
Results: 447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).
Conclusion: This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.
期刊介绍:
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects