小儿耳内异物清除手术方案的安全性和有效性。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Laryngoscope Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1002/lary.32073
Dilan Prasad, Glenn Isaacson
{"title":"小儿耳内异物清除手术方案的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Dilan Prasad, Glenn Isaacson","doi":"10.1002/lary.32073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3-Retrospective review.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of a Protocol for In-Office Pediatric Aural Foreign Body Removal.\",\"authors\":\"Dilan Prasad, Glenn Isaacson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lary.32073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3-Retrospective review.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laryngoscope\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究一种分步方案在儿科人群中耳异物(FB)办公室移除术的安全性和有效性。方法:所有到学术儿科门诊就诊的儿童都从计算机收集的办公室记录和手术报告中进行识别。FB的移除以标准的方式进行,包括:(1)术前讨论,共同决策;(2)仰卧位约束,由训练过的第二个人扶着头部;(3)使用手术显微镜和器械去除FB。如果需要在镇静或全身麻醉下切除,则认为手术失败。结果:428例患儿共发现447例(耳),其中19例为双侧FBs。201/428(47%)患儿曾在其他地方尝试过FB移除术。431/447(96.4%)的FBs在办公室成功提取。16/447(3.6%)的FBs在手术室被移除。在431例成功切除的病例中,有2例患者出现了轻微的并发症(耳道撕裂)。没有孩子遭受更严重的并发症。切除失败组更有可能有记录的神经发育障碍(4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001)。结论:该方案导致高成功率的FB去除,即使是以前的尝试失败的儿童。在这22年的研究中,包括患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和自闭症谱系障碍的儿童,没有出现明显的耳部损伤。这种方法应该被在办公室照顾儿童的耳鼻喉科医生考虑。证据等级:3级回顾性审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and Efficacy of a Protocol for In-Office Pediatric Aural Foreign Body Removal.

Objectives: To examine the safety and efficacy of a step-by-step protocol for the office removal of aural foreign bodies (FB) in a pediatric population.

Methods: All children presenting to an academic pediatric outpatient department were identified from a computerized collection of office notes and operative reports. FB removal was performed in a standard fashion including: (1) pre-procedure discussion with shared decision making, (2) restraint in a supine position with a trained second person holding the head, (3) FB removal using an operative microscope and instrumentation. A case was considered a failure if subsequent removal under sedation or general anesthesia was required.

Results: 447 total cases (ears) were identified in 428 children (19 had bilateral FBs). 201/428 (47%) of children had previous attempts at FB removal elsewhere. 431/447 (96.4%) of FBs were successfully extracted in the office. 16/447 (3.6%) of FBs were removed in the operating room. Out of the 431 successful removals, two patients had minor complications (ear canal lacerations). No child suffered a more severe complication. The failed removal group was more likely to have a documented neurodevelopmental disorder (4/21 vs. 12/407, p = 0.0001).

Conclusion: This protocol resulted in a high rate of successful FB removal, even in children with prior failed attempts. There were no significant ear injuries in this 22-year experience, which included children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder. This approach should be considered by otolaryngologists who care for children in the office setting.

Level of evidence: 3-Retrospective review.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laryngoscope
Laryngoscope 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
500
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope. • Broncho-esophagology • Communicative disorders • Head and neck surgery • Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery • Oncology • Speech and hearing defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信