在职业治疗中拥抱多元哲学取向,提升文化敏感度。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Joana Nana Serwaa Akrofi, Tsu-Hsin Howe, Janet Njelesani
{"title":"在职业治疗中拥抱多元哲学取向,提升文化敏感度。","authors":"Joana Nana Serwaa Akrofi, Tsu-Hsin Howe, Janet Njelesani","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.050960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The philosophical foundations of occupational therapy, originating in North America, primarily align with American philosophy, which leads to challenges when occupational therapy is applied in diverse cultural contexts. The occupational therapy profession needs to embrace multiple philosophical orientations to enhance cultural sensitivity. In this column, the authors use postcolonial theory to analyze colonial legacies and power dynamics within communities, highlighting the limitations of current Western-based adaptations in promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and accessibility. They argue that incorporating diverse philosophical orientations into occupational therapy can enrich the field by fostering adaptability and inclusivity. They also outline steps to integrate multiple philosophical orientations, including acknowledging historical influences and adopting practices that resonate with diverse values. Embracing multiple philosophical orientations signifies the profession's commitment to evolving and responding effectively to the complex needs of individuals and communities, thereby promoting more equitable and just outcomes in occupational therapy practice. Positionality Statement: The authors of this column include a Ghanaian nondisabled occupational therapist who studied and practiced occupational therapy in Ghana, West Africa, and the United States; a White, nondisabled, female Canadian occupational therapy scholar with practice experience across numerous international contexts; and an Asian, nondisabled, female occupational therapy scholar who has occupational therapy practice experience in both Asia and the United States. All three authors currently live and work in the United States. They drew from their personal experiences, knowledge of the profession, research evidence, and critical reasoning to conceptualize this column.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Embracing Multiple Philosophical Orientations in Occupational Therapy to Enhance Cultural Sensitivity.\",\"authors\":\"Joana Nana Serwaa Akrofi, Tsu-Hsin Howe, Janet Njelesani\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2025.050960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The philosophical foundations of occupational therapy, originating in North America, primarily align with American philosophy, which leads to challenges when occupational therapy is applied in diverse cultural contexts. The occupational therapy profession needs to embrace multiple philosophical orientations to enhance cultural sensitivity. In this column, the authors use postcolonial theory to analyze colonial legacies and power dynamics within communities, highlighting the limitations of current Western-based adaptations in promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and accessibility. They argue that incorporating diverse philosophical orientations into occupational therapy can enrich the field by fostering adaptability and inclusivity. They also outline steps to integrate multiple philosophical orientations, including acknowledging historical influences and adopting practices that resonate with diverse values. Embracing multiple philosophical orientations signifies the profession's commitment to evolving and responding effectively to the complex needs of individuals and communities, thereby promoting more equitable and just outcomes in occupational therapy practice. Positionality Statement: The authors of this column include a Ghanaian nondisabled occupational therapist who studied and practiced occupational therapy in Ghana, West Africa, and the United States; a White, nondisabled, female Canadian occupational therapy scholar with practice experience across numerous international contexts; and an Asian, nondisabled, female occupational therapy scholar who has occupational therapy practice experience in both Asia and the United States. All three authors currently live and work in the United States. They drew from their personal experiences, knowledge of the profession, research evidence, and critical reasoning to conceptualize this column.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"79 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050960\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.050960","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业治疗的哲学基础起源于北美,主要与美国哲学保持一致,这导致了职业治疗在不同文化背景下应用的挑战。职业治疗专业需要拥抱多元的哲学取向,以增强文化敏感性。在本专栏中,作者运用后殖民理论分析了殖民遗产和社区内的权力动态,强调了当前以西方为基础的适应在促进多样性、公平、包容、正义和可及性方面的局限性。他们认为,将不同的哲学取向纳入职业治疗可以通过培养适应性和包容性来丰富该领域。他们还概述了整合多种哲学取向的步骤,包括承认历史影响和采用与不同价值观产生共鸣的实践。拥抱多重哲学取向意味着职业治疗致力于发展和有效应对个人和社区的复杂需求,从而在职业治疗实践中促进更公平和公正的结果。立场声明:本专栏的作者包括一位加纳非残疾职业治疗师,他曾在加纳、西非和美国学习和实践职业治疗;一位白人,非残疾,加拿大女性职业治疗学者,在许多国际背景下有实践经验;以及一位在亚洲和美国都有职业治疗实践经验的亚裔非残疾女性职业治疗学者。三位作者目前都在美国生活和工作。他们从他们的个人经历、专业知识、研究证据和批判性推理中提炼出这个专栏的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Embracing Multiple Philosophical Orientations in Occupational Therapy to Enhance Cultural Sensitivity.

The philosophical foundations of occupational therapy, originating in North America, primarily align with American philosophy, which leads to challenges when occupational therapy is applied in diverse cultural contexts. The occupational therapy profession needs to embrace multiple philosophical orientations to enhance cultural sensitivity. In this column, the authors use postcolonial theory to analyze colonial legacies and power dynamics within communities, highlighting the limitations of current Western-based adaptations in promoting diversity, equity, inclusion, justice, and accessibility. They argue that incorporating diverse philosophical orientations into occupational therapy can enrich the field by fostering adaptability and inclusivity. They also outline steps to integrate multiple philosophical orientations, including acknowledging historical influences and adopting practices that resonate with diverse values. Embracing multiple philosophical orientations signifies the profession's commitment to evolving and responding effectively to the complex needs of individuals and communities, thereby promoting more equitable and just outcomes in occupational therapy practice. Positionality Statement: The authors of this column include a Ghanaian nondisabled occupational therapist who studied and practiced occupational therapy in Ghana, West Africa, and the United States; a White, nondisabled, female Canadian occupational therapy scholar with practice experience across numerous international contexts; and an Asian, nondisabled, female occupational therapy scholar who has occupational therapy practice experience in both Asia and the United States. All three authors currently live and work in the United States. They drew from their personal experiences, knowledge of the profession, research evidence, and critical reasoning to conceptualize this column.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信