物理治疗师诊断影像的排序:成功实施的多中心分析。

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Aaron Keil, Evan O Nelson, Stephen Michael Kareha, Scott Tauferner, Brian Baranyi, Kelly Clark
{"title":"物理治疗师诊断影像的排序:成功实施的多中心分析。","authors":"Aaron Keil, Evan O Nelson, Stephen Michael Kareha, Scott Tauferner, Brian Baranyi, Kelly Clark","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2465738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The profession of physical therapy in the United States has evolved significantly since the American Physical Therapy Association introduced Vision 2020, advocating for consumers' direct access to physical therapy services. As the use of direct access expands, it becomes essential to examine successful models and resources, such as those that allow physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging. This study aims to report the utilization, appropriateness, and reimbursement for diagnostic imaging referrals made by physical therapists during routine care across multiple health care organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective observational study of patients seeking care for neuromusculoskeletal conditions at ambulatory physical therapy clinics at three healthcare organizations. Data from each organization related to physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging was reviewed to determine utilization rate, appropriateness, and reimbursement. American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria were used to determine appropriateness of diagnostic imaging referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five physical therapists signed 596 referrals for diagnostic imaging during 61,012 episodes of routine care. The utilization rate was 9.8 diagnostic imaging referrals per 1000 episodes of care. Ninety-one percent of the referrals were consistent with evidence based ACR guidelines and deemed appropriate. There were no instances of insurance denial when a physical therapist signed the referral for diagnostic imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical therapists with privileges to directly refer for diagnostic imaging did so judiciously and followed ACR guidelines when referring patients for imaging. The absence of insurance reimbursement claim denial contrasts a common concern about physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging. Physical therapists referred for appropriate imaging studies and are unlikely to contribute to diagnostic imaging overutilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordering of diagnostic imaging by physical therapists: a multi-center analysis of successful implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Keil, Evan O Nelson, Stephen Michael Kareha, Scott Tauferner, Brian Baranyi, Kelly Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10669817.2025.2465738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The profession of physical therapy in the United States has evolved significantly since the American Physical Therapy Association introduced Vision 2020, advocating for consumers' direct access to physical therapy services. As the use of direct access expands, it becomes essential to examine successful models and resources, such as those that allow physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging. This study aims to report the utilization, appropriateness, and reimbursement for diagnostic imaging referrals made by physical therapists during routine care across multiple health care organizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective observational study of patients seeking care for neuromusculoskeletal conditions at ambulatory physical therapy clinics at three healthcare organizations. Data from each organization related to physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging was reviewed to determine utilization rate, appropriateness, and reimbursement. American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria were used to determine appropriateness of diagnostic imaging referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five physical therapists signed 596 referrals for diagnostic imaging during 61,012 episodes of routine care. The utilization rate was 9.8 diagnostic imaging referrals per 1000 episodes of care. Ninety-one percent of the referrals were consistent with evidence based ACR guidelines and deemed appropriate. There were no instances of insurance denial when a physical therapist signed the referral for diagnostic imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical therapists with privileges to directly refer for diagnostic imaging did so judiciously and followed ACR guidelines when referring patients for imaging. The absence of insurance reimbursement claim denial contrasts a common concern about physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging. Physical therapists referred for appropriate imaging studies and are unlikely to contribute to diagnostic imaging overutilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2465738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2465738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自美国物理治疗协会推出愿景2020以来,美国物理治疗行业发生了重大变化,倡导消费者直接获得物理治疗服务。随着直接访问的使用扩大,检查成功的模型和资源变得至关重要,例如那些允许物理治疗师转诊进行诊断成像的模型和资源。本研究旨在报告在多个医疗机构的常规护理中,物理治疗师所做的诊断影像转诊的利用率、适当性和报销情况。方法:本研究是一项回顾性观察性研究,对在三家医疗机构的门诊物理治疗诊所寻求神经肌肉骨骼疾病护理的患者进行研究。从每个组织的数据相关的物理治疗师转诊诊断成像进行审查,以确定利用率,适当性和报销。采用美国放射学会(ACR)标准来确定诊断性影像学转诊的适当性。结果:在61,012次常规护理中,75名物理治疗师签署了596份诊断影像学转诊。使用率为每1000次就诊9.8次影像学诊断转诊。91%的转诊符合基于证据的ACR指南并被认为是适当的。当物理治疗师签署诊断成像转诊时,没有保险拒绝的情况。结论:具有直接转诊诊断性影像学特权的物理治疗师在转诊患者时明智地遵循ACR指南。缺乏保险报销索赔拒绝对比常见的关注物理治疗师转介诊断成像。物理治疗师被推荐进行适当的影像学研究,不太可能导致诊断性影像学的过度使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ordering of diagnostic imaging by physical therapists: a multi-center analysis of successful implementation.

Objective: The profession of physical therapy in the United States has evolved significantly since the American Physical Therapy Association introduced Vision 2020, advocating for consumers' direct access to physical therapy services. As the use of direct access expands, it becomes essential to examine successful models and resources, such as those that allow physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging. This study aims to report the utilization, appropriateness, and reimbursement for diagnostic imaging referrals made by physical therapists during routine care across multiple health care organizations.

Methods: This study was a retrospective observational study of patients seeking care for neuromusculoskeletal conditions at ambulatory physical therapy clinics at three healthcare organizations. Data from each organization related to physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging was reviewed to determine utilization rate, appropriateness, and reimbursement. American College of Radiology (ACR) criteria were used to determine appropriateness of diagnostic imaging referral.

Results: Seventy-five physical therapists signed 596 referrals for diagnostic imaging during 61,012 episodes of routine care. The utilization rate was 9.8 diagnostic imaging referrals per 1000 episodes of care. Ninety-one percent of the referrals were consistent with evidence based ACR guidelines and deemed appropriate. There were no instances of insurance denial when a physical therapist signed the referral for diagnostic imaging.

Conclusion: Physical therapists with privileges to directly refer for diagnostic imaging did so judiciously and followed ACR guidelines when referring patients for imaging. The absence of insurance reimbursement claim denial contrasts a common concern about physical therapist referral for diagnostic imaging. Physical therapists referred for appropriate imaging studies and are unlikely to contribute to diagnostic imaging overutilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信