气道支架置入治疗气道食管瘘的疗效和安全性。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1159/000544124
Xiangnan Li, Peiyuan Luo, Mengyu Zhao, Feifei Wen, Guancheng Jiang, Yibei You, Yaru Liu, Xuan Wu, Felix J F Herth, Quncheng Zhang
{"title":"气道支架置入治疗气道食管瘘的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Xiangnan Li, Peiyuan Luo, Mengyu Zhao, Feifei Wen, Guancheng Jiang, Yibei You, Yaru Liu, Xuan Wu, Felix J F Herth, Quncheng Zhang","doi":"10.1159/000544124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate both the clinical efficacy and safety of airway stent placement in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer-associated airway esophageal fistula (AEF). The focus is on evaluating improvements in patient survival and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, this study enrolled 111 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer-associated AEF. Among them, 50 (45.0%) and 61 (55.0%) patients received airway stent placement and conservative treatment, respectively. Follow-up assessments were conducted to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the interventions, with survival and quality of life as the primary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the end of the follow-up, 98 of 111 patients (88.3%) had died, leaving 13 survivors (11.7%). Patients with esophageal cancer-associated AEF had an overall mean survival time of 147.4 (95% CI, 123.9-170.9) days. Patients in the stent placement group had a mean survival of 192.5 (95% CI, 151.2-233.7) days, which was significantly longer than the 110.0 (95% CI, 88.1-131.8) days in the conservative treatment group (p < 0.001). Sex (p = 0.017), tumor stage (p = 0.030), surgery (p = 0.005), pulmonary infection (p < 0.001), fistula size (p < 0.001), and pre-Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p < 0.001) were the independent risk factors affecting survival. Furthermore, patients in the stent placement group demonstrated improved KPS scores post-treatment, increasing from 48.2 to 57.9 (p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Airway stent placement is beneficial in alleviating the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with esophageal cancer-associated AEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Airway Stent Placement in the Treatment of Airway Esophageal Fistula.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangnan Li, Peiyuan Luo, Mengyu Zhao, Feifei Wen, Guancheng Jiang, Yibei You, Yaru Liu, Xuan Wu, Felix J F Herth, Quncheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000544124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate both the clinical efficacy and safety of airway stent placement in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer-associated airway esophageal fistula (AEF). The focus is on evaluating improvements in patient survival and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, this study enrolled 111 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer-associated AEF. Among them, 50 (45.0%) and 61 (55.0%) patients received airway stent placement and conservative treatment, respectively. Follow-up assessments were conducted to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the interventions, with survival and quality of life as the primary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By the end of the follow-up, 98 of 111 patients (88.3%) had died, leaving 13 survivors (11.7%). Patients with esophageal cancer-associated AEF had an overall mean survival time of 147.4 (95% CI, 123.9-170.9) days. Patients in the stent placement group had a mean survival of 192.5 (95% CI, 151.2-233.7) days, which was significantly longer than the 110.0 (95% CI, 88.1-131.8) days in the conservative treatment group (p < 0.001). Sex (p = 0.017), tumor stage (p = 0.030), surgery (p = 0.005), pulmonary infection (p < 0.001), fistula size (p < 0.001), and pre-Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p < 0.001) were the independent risk factors affecting survival. Furthermore, patients in the stent placement group demonstrated improved KPS scores post-treatment, increasing from 48.2 to 57.9 (p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Airway stent placement is beneficial in alleviating the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with esophageal cancer-associated AEF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究旨在评价气道支架置入治疗食管癌相关气道食管瘘(AEF)的临床疗效和安全性。重点是评估患者生存和生活质量的改善。方法:本研究共纳入111例诊断为食管癌相关AEF的患者。其中分别有50例(45.0%)和61例(55.0%)患者接受了气道支架置入术和保守治疗。以生存和生活质量为主要终点,进行随访评估以确定干预措施的临床疗效和安全性。结果:随访结束时,111例患者死亡98例(88.3%),存活13例(11.7%)。食管癌相关AEF患者的总平均生存时间为147.4天(95%CI, 123.9-170.9)。支架置入术组患者的平均生存期为192.5 (95% CI, 151.2 ~ 233.7)天,明显长于保守治疗组的110.0 (95% CI, 88.1 ~ 131.8)天(p < 0.001)。性别(p = 0.017)、肿瘤分期(p = 0.030)、手术(p = 0.005)、肺部感染(p < 0.001)、瘘管大小(p < 0.001)、karnofsky性能状态(KPS) (p < 0.001)是影响生存的独立危险因素。此外,支架置入组患者治疗后KPS评分从48.2提高到57.9 (p = 0.017)。结论:气道支架置入术有利于缓解食管癌相关性急性心衰患者的症状、生活质量和生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Airway Stent Placement in the Treatment of Airway Esophageal Fistula.

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate both the clinical efficacy and safety of airway stent placement in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer-associated airway esophageal fistula (AEF). The focus is on evaluating improvements in patient survival and quality of life.

Methods: Overall, this study enrolled 111 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer-associated AEF. Among them, 50 (45.0%) and 61 (55.0%) patients received airway stent placement and conservative treatment, respectively. Follow-up assessments were conducted to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the interventions, with survival and quality of life as the primary endpoints.

Results: By the end of the follow-up, 98 of 111 patients (88.3%) had died, leaving 13 survivors (11.7%). Patients with esophageal cancer-associated AEF had an overall mean survival time of 147.4 (95% CI, 123.9-170.9) days. Patients in the stent placement group had a mean survival of 192.5 (95% CI, 151.2-233.7) days, which was significantly longer than the 110.0 (95% CI, 88.1-131.8) days in the conservative treatment group (p < 0.001). Sex (p = 0.017), tumor stage (p = 0.030), surgery (p = 0.005), pulmonary infection (p < 0.001), fistula size (p < 0.001), and pre-Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p < 0.001) were the independent risk factors affecting survival. Furthermore, patients in the stent placement group demonstrated improved KPS scores post-treatment, increasing from 48.2 to 57.9 (p = 0.017).

Conclusion: Airway stent placement is beneficial in alleviating the symptoms, quality of life, and survival of patients with esophageal cancer-associated AEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信