草海植被覆盖差异对土壤有机碳组成及稳定性的影响[j]。

Q2 Environmental Science
He-Feng Wan, Juan Jiang, Gui-Ting Mu, Yun-Chuan Long, Rong-Xiang Su
{"title":"草海植被覆盖差异对土壤有机碳组成及稳定性的影响[j]。","authors":"He-Feng Wan, Juan Jiang, Gui-Ting Mu, Yun-Chuan Long, Rong-Xiang Su","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202402096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) stability and carbon sequestration potential can be affected by vegetation cover. The Caohai in Guizhou is a typical plateau freshwater wetland ecosystem at the same latitude as other regions worldwide. The study focused on the soils from Caohai and selected five types of vegetation cover, including forest land, cultivated land, grassland, reeds, and tidal flats. Soil samples were collected vertically at depths of 0-20, 20-40, and 40-60 cm, and the activity and stability of SOC were tested to explore the impact of different vegetation covers on the composition and stability of SOC, finally providing basic data for soil carbon sequestration and ecological protection in the Caohai. The results indicated that cover variability led to differences in SOC content on the vertical distribution scale (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Comparing SOC content in various covers with tidal flats (14.75 g·kg<sup>-1</sup>) on a horizontal scale, reductions were observed in forests (19.32%), reeds (15.05%), cropland (12.47%), and grassland (1.58%). The proportions of stable and labile organic carbon (SAOC and LOC) accounted for 52.51% and 45.00% of the total SOC content, respectively. The <i>ω</i>(ROC) (g·kg<sup>-1</sup>) values were 7.89 (forests), 7.47 (tidal flats), 6.67 (reeds), 6.36 (cropland), and 5.67 (grassland), with N/P and TN being the main physicochemical factors influencing ROC (<i>r</i>≥0.72). ROCI ranged from 0.16 to 0.34, with the highest in forest land and relatively lower values in cropland and grassland, mainly affected by N/P (<i>P</i>&lt;0.01), negatively correlated with BD (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), and influenced by cover type (<i>P</i>&lt;0.001) and soil depth (<i>P</i>&lt;0.01). Both cover type and soil depth interacted significantly with ROCI (<i>P</i>&lt;0.01). The research indicated that vegetation cover variability altered organic matter decomposition and accumulation, leading to a differential distribution of organic carbon components. Agricultural activities affected the stability and accumulation status of organic carbon, contributing to the higher levels of unstable carbon components SAOC and LOC and exhibiting significant potential for soil carbon sequestration enhancement. Moreover, it is recommended to implement scientific management practices to transition towards a more stable state, thereby enhancing regional ROCI levels and carbon sequestration potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 2","pages":"1046-1055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Impact of Differences in Vegetation Cover on Soil Organic Carbon Composition and Stability in Caohai].\",\"authors\":\"He-Feng Wan, Juan Jiang, Gui-Ting Mu, Yun-Chuan Long, Rong-Xiang Su\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202402096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) stability and carbon sequestration potential can be affected by vegetation cover. The Caohai in Guizhou is a typical plateau freshwater wetland ecosystem at the same latitude as other regions worldwide. The study focused on the soils from Caohai and selected five types of vegetation cover, including forest land, cultivated land, grassland, reeds, and tidal flats. Soil samples were collected vertically at depths of 0-20, 20-40, and 40-60 cm, and the activity and stability of SOC were tested to explore the impact of different vegetation covers on the composition and stability of SOC, finally providing basic data for soil carbon sequestration and ecological protection in the Caohai. The results indicated that cover variability led to differences in SOC content on the vertical distribution scale (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05). Comparing SOC content in various covers with tidal flats (14.75 g·kg<sup>-1</sup>) on a horizontal scale, reductions were observed in forests (19.32%), reeds (15.05%), cropland (12.47%), and grassland (1.58%). The proportions of stable and labile organic carbon (SAOC and LOC) accounted for 52.51% and 45.00% of the total SOC content, respectively. The <i>ω</i>(ROC) (g·kg<sup>-1</sup>) values were 7.89 (forests), 7.47 (tidal flats), 6.67 (reeds), 6.36 (cropland), and 5.67 (grassland), with N/P and TN being the main physicochemical factors influencing ROC (<i>r</i>≥0.72). ROCI ranged from 0.16 to 0.34, with the highest in forest land and relatively lower values in cropland and grassland, mainly affected by N/P (<i>P</i>&lt;0.01), negatively correlated with BD (<i>P</i>&lt;0.05), and influenced by cover type (<i>P</i>&lt;0.001) and soil depth (<i>P</i>&lt;0.01). Both cover type and soil depth interacted significantly with ROCI (<i>P</i>&lt;0.01). The research indicated that vegetation cover variability altered organic matter decomposition and accumulation, leading to a differential distribution of organic carbon components. Agricultural activities affected the stability and accumulation status of organic carbon, contributing to the higher levels of unstable carbon components SAOC and LOC and exhibiting significant potential for soil carbon sequestration enhancement. Moreover, it is recommended to implement scientific management practices to transition towards a more stable state, thereby enhancing regional ROCI levels and carbon sequestration potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"1046-1055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202402096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202402096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植被覆盖会影响土壤有机碳稳定性和固碳潜力。贵州草海与世界其他地区处于同一纬度,是典型的高原淡水湿地生态系统。以草海土壤为研究对象,选取林地、耕地、草地、芦苇、滩涂等5种植被类型。垂直采集0 ~ 20、20 ~ 40、40 ~ 60 cm深度土壤样品,检测土壤有机碳活性和稳定性,探讨不同植被覆盖对土壤有机碳组成和稳定性的影响,为草海土壤固碳和生态保护提供基础数据。结果表明,覆盖变异导致土壤有机碳含量在垂直分布尺度上的差异(P<0.05)。在水平尺度上,滩涂不同覆盖层的有机碳含量分别为14.75 g·kg-1,森林(19.32%)、芦苇(15.05%)、农田(12.47%)和草地(1.58%)降低。稳定有机碳(SAOC)和不稳定有机碳(LOC)分别占总有机碳含量的52.51%和45.00%。ω(ROC) (g·kg-1)分别为7.89(森林)、7.47(滩地)、6.67(芦苇)、6.36(农田)和5.67(草地),其中N/P和TN是影响ROC的主要理化因子(r≥0.72)。ROCI范围为0.16 ~ 0.34,林地最高,农田和草地相对较低,主要受N/P (P<0.01)的影响,与BD (P<0.05)负相关,受覆盖类型(P<0.001)和土壤深度(P<0.01)的影响。覆盖类型和土壤深度与ROCI交互作用显著(P<0.01)。研究表明,植被覆盖度变化改变了有机质的分解和积累,导致有机碳组分的差异分布。农业活动影响了有机碳的稳定性和积累状态,导致不稳定碳组分SAOC和LOC水平升高,显示出显著的土壤固碳潜力。此外,建议实施科学的管理实践,向更稳定的状态过渡,从而提高区域ROCI水平和固碳潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Impact of Differences in Vegetation Cover on Soil Organic Carbon Composition and Stability in Caohai].

Soil organic carbon (SOC) stability and carbon sequestration potential can be affected by vegetation cover. The Caohai in Guizhou is a typical plateau freshwater wetland ecosystem at the same latitude as other regions worldwide. The study focused on the soils from Caohai and selected five types of vegetation cover, including forest land, cultivated land, grassland, reeds, and tidal flats. Soil samples were collected vertically at depths of 0-20, 20-40, and 40-60 cm, and the activity and stability of SOC were tested to explore the impact of different vegetation covers on the composition and stability of SOC, finally providing basic data for soil carbon sequestration and ecological protection in the Caohai. The results indicated that cover variability led to differences in SOC content on the vertical distribution scale (P<0.05). Comparing SOC content in various covers with tidal flats (14.75 g·kg-1) on a horizontal scale, reductions were observed in forests (19.32%), reeds (15.05%), cropland (12.47%), and grassland (1.58%). The proportions of stable and labile organic carbon (SAOC and LOC) accounted for 52.51% and 45.00% of the total SOC content, respectively. The ω(ROC) (g·kg-1) values were 7.89 (forests), 7.47 (tidal flats), 6.67 (reeds), 6.36 (cropland), and 5.67 (grassland), with N/P and TN being the main physicochemical factors influencing ROC (r≥0.72). ROCI ranged from 0.16 to 0.34, with the highest in forest land and relatively lower values in cropland and grassland, mainly affected by N/P (P<0.01), negatively correlated with BD (P<0.05), and influenced by cover type (P<0.001) and soil depth (P<0.01). Both cover type and soil depth interacted significantly with ROCI (P<0.01). The research indicated that vegetation cover variability altered organic matter decomposition and accumulation, leading to a differential distribution of organic carbon components. Agricultural activities affected the stability and accumulation status of organic carbon, contributing to the higher levels of unstable carbon components SAOC and LOC and exhibiting significant potential for soil carbon sequestration enhancement. Moreover, it is recommended to implement scientific management practices to transition towards a more stable state, thereby enhancing regional ROCI levels and carbon sequestration potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信