Klemen Pečnik, Žana Juvan, Gregor Dolinar, Matevž Pogačnik
{"title":"针对斯洛文尼亚手语母语用户的手语用户体验问卷。","authors":"Klemen Pečnik, Žana Juvan, Gregor Dolinar, Matevž Pogačnik","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-89954-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accessibility of interactive services is vital for building an inclusive society. While accessibility standards are increasingly being adopted, there remains a gap in user experience evaluation approaches tailored to deaf participants. To address this, the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) was translated to Slovenian Sign Language (SSL) and its appropriateness and reliability evaluated in a research study. Two interactive TV solutions for deaf viewers were developed and evaluated using a standard written UEQ in Slovenian (UEQ TXT) and a UEQ translated to Slovenian Sign Language (UEQ SSL). A total of 27 deaf participants and 6 Slovenian Sign Language interpreters participated in the study. A thorough statistical analysis of the results was conducted on both individual UEQ attributes and overall scales. The results show no statistically significant differences in evaluation results when gathered with UEQ SSL and UEQ TXT. Participants expressed a strong preference for UEQ SSL, as it enabled them to express their opinions more accurately and completely in their primary language, fostering greater independence and ensuring their perspectives are fully represented. The findings show that the UEQ SSL is a valid and effective tool, with the potential to bridge the inclusion gap for deaf and hard-of-hearing users in UX evaluation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"5802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User experience questionnaire in sign language for native users of Slovenian sign language.\",\"authors\":\"Klemen Pečnik, Žana Juvan, Gregor Dolinar, Matevž Pogačnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-89954-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accessibility of interactive services is vital for building an inclusive society. While accessibility standards are increasingly being adopted, there remains a gap in user experience evaluation approaches tailored to deaf participants. To address this, the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) was translated to Slovenian Sign Language (SSL) and its appropriateness and reliability evaluated in a research study. Two interactive TV solutions for deaf viewers were developed and evaluated using a standard written UEQ in Slovenian (UEQ TXT) and a UEQ translated to Slovenian Sign Language (UEQ SSL). A total of 27 deaf participants and 6 Slovenian Sign Language interpreters participated in the study. A thorough statistical analysis of the results was conducted on both individual UEQ attributes and overall scales. The results show no statistically significant differences in evaluation results when gathered with UEQ SSL and UEQ TXT. Participants expressed a strong preference for UEQ SSL, as it enabled them to express their opinions more accurately and completely in their primary language, fostering greater independence and ensuring their perspectives are fully represented. The findings show that the UEQ SSL is a valid and effective tool, with the potential to bridge the inclusion gap for deaf and hard-of-hearing users in UX evaluation studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"5802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89954-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89954-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
User experience questionnaire in sign language for native users of Slovenian sign language.
Accessibility of interactive services is vital for building an inclusive society. While accessibility standards are increasingly being adopted, there remains a gap in user experience evaluation approaches tailored to deaf participants. To address this, the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) was translated to Slovenian Sign Language (SSL) and its appropriateness and reliability evaluated in a research study. Two interactive TV solutions for deaf viewers were developed and evaluated using a standard written UEQ in Slovenian (UEQ TXT) and a UEQ translated to Slovenian Sign Language (UEQ SSL). A total of 27 deaf participants and 6 Slovenian Sign Language interpreters participated in the study. A thorough statistical analysis of the results was conducted on both individual UEQ attributes and overall scales. The results show no statistically significant differences in evaluation results when gathered with UEQ SSL and UEQ TXT. Participants expressed a strong preference for UEQ SSL, as it enabled them to express their opinions more accurately and completely in their primary language, fostering greater independence and ensuring their perspectives are fully represented. The findings show that the UEQ SSL is a valid and effective tool, with the potential to bridge the inclusion gap for deaf and hard-of-hearing users in UX evaluation studies.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.