Denisa Hývlová, Radovan Jiřík, Jiří Vitouš, Ondřej Macíček, Lucie Krátká, Eva Dražanová, Zenon Starčuk
{"title":"<ArticleTitle xmlns:ns0=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\">Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: A comparative analysis of permeability quantification based on <ns0:math> <ns0:mrow> <ns0:msup><ns0:mrow><ns0:mi>K</ns0:mi></ns0:mrow> <ns0:mrow><ns0:mtext>trans</ns0:mtext></ns0:mrow> </ns0:msup> </ns0:mrow> </ns0:math> and PS.","authors":"Denisa Hývlová, Radovan Jiřík, Jiří Vitouš, Ondřej Macíček, Lucie Krátká, Eva Dražanová, Zenon Starčuk","doi":"10.1002/mrm.30446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a promising method for neurotherapeutic delivery. The standard for quantifying induced BBB permeability is the <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> parameter, which reflects both permeability and plasma flow. The influence of plasma flow can be eliminated by estimating the PS parameter. However, this parameter has been largely unexplored in this application. This study aims to compare permeability estimates based on <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and PS in focused ultrasound-induced BBB opening experiments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the extended Tofts model (ETM) and the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) to estimate <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and PS parameters, respectively. Permeability estimates were compared using simulated concentration curves, simulated DCE-MRI data, and real datasets. We explored the influence of spatially-regularized model fitting on the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For opened BBB, <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> was minimally influenced by plasma flow under the tested conditions. However, fitting the ETM often introduced outliers in <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> estimates in regions with closed BBB. The 2CXM outperformed the ETM at high signal-to-noise ratios, but its higher complexity led to lower precision at low signal-to-noise ratios. Both these issues were successfully compensated by spatially-regularized model fitting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both <math> <semantics> <mrow> <msup><mrow><mi>K</mi></mrow> <mrow><mtext>trans</mtext></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {K}^{\\mathrm{trans}} $$</annotation></semantics> </math> and PS seem to be eligible options for the quantification of BBB opening, and the correct choice depends on the specifics of the acquired DCE-MRI data. Additionally, spatial regularization has demonstrated its importance in enhancing the accuracy and reproducibility of results for both models.</p>","PeriodicalId":18065,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.30446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:聚焦超声诱导血脑屏障(BBB)开放是一种很有前景的神经治疗递送方法。量化诱导血脑屏障通透性的标准是 K trans $$ {K}^{mathrm{trans}} 参数。$$ 参数,它同时反映了渗透性和血浆流动性。通过估算 PS 参数可以消除血浆流动的影响。然而,在这一应用中,该参数在很大程度上尚未被探索。本研究旨在比较基于 K trans $$ {K}^{\mathrm{trans}} 和 PS 的渗透性估计值。$$ 和 PS 在聚焦超声诱导 BBB 开放实验中的渗透性估计值:方法:我们使用扩展托夫斯模型(ETM)和两室交换模型(2CXM)分别估算了K trans $$ {K}^{mathrm{trans}}$ 和PS参数。和 PS 参数。我们使用模拟浓度曲线、模拟 DCE-MRI 数据和真实数据集对渗透性估计值进行了比较。我们探讨了空间规则化模型拟合对结果的影响:结果:对于开放的 BBB,K trans $$ {K}^{mathrm{trans}}$ 对血浆流动的影响最小。$$ 在测试条件下受等离子体流动的影响很小。然而,在封闭的 BBB 区域,拟合 ETM 经常会在 K trans $$ {K}^{mathrm{trans}} 中引入异常值。$$ 的估计值。在高信噪比条件下,2CXM 的性能优于 ETM,但在低信噪比条件下,其较高的复杂性导致精度较低。空间规则化模型拟合成功地弥补了这两个问题:结论:K trans $$ {K}^{mathrm{trans}} 和 PS结论:K trans$ {K}^{mathrm{trans}$ 和 PS 似乎都可用于量化 BBB 开放程度,正确的选择取决于所获取的 DCE-MRI 数据的具体情况。此外,空间正则化在提高两种模型结果的准确性和可重复性方面也显示了其重要性。
Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: A comparative analysis of permeability quantification based on Ktrans and PS.
Purpose: Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a promising method for neurotherapeutic delivery. The standard for quantifying induced BBB permeability is the parameter, which reflects both permeability and plasma flow. The influence of plasma flow can be eliminated by estimating the PS parameter. However, this parameter has been largely unexplored in this application. This study aims to compare permeability estimates based on and PS in focused ultrasound-induced BBB opening experiments.
Methods: We used the extended Tofts model (ETM) and the two-compartment exchange model (2CXM) to estimate and PS parameters, respectively. Permeability estimates were compared using simulated concentration curves, simulated DCE-MRI data, and real datasets. We explored the influence of spatially-regularized model fitting on the results.
Results: For opened BBB, was minimally influenced by plasma flow under the tested conditions. However, fitting the ETM often introduced outliers in estimates in regions with closed BBB. The 2CXM outperformed the ETM at high signal-to-noise ratios, but its higher complexity led to lower precision at low signal-to-noise ratios. Both these issues were successfully compensated by spatially-regularized model fitting.
Conclusion: Both and PS seem to be eligible options for the quantification of BBB opening, and the correct choice depends on the specifics of the acquired DCE-MRI data. Additionally, spatial regularization has demonstrated its importance in enhancing the accuracy and reproducibility of results for both models.
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (Magn Reson Med) is an international journal devoted to the publication of original investigations concerned with all aspects of the development and use of nuclear magnetic resonance and electron paramagnetic resonance techniques for medical applications. Reports of original investigations in the areas of mathematics, computing, engineering, physics, biophysics, chemistry, biochemistry, and physiology directly relevant to magnetic resonance will be accepted, as well as methodology-oriented clinical studies.