社区老年人在线有用视野测试的效度和信度。

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shannon K Runge, Elizabeth M Hudak, Jade A Sutfin, Victor R Dobrovolskiy, Jerri D Edwards
{"title":"社区老年人在线有用视野测试的效度和信度。","authors":"Shannon K Runge, Elizabeth M Hudak, Jade A Sutfin, Victor R Dobrovolskiy, Jerri D Edwards","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2025.2461518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Useful Field of View Test (UFOV®) is a widely used measure of processing speed and visual attention that predicts driving performance and other functional abilities among older adults. We examined the reliability and validity of a new UFOV® version adapted for online administration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Community-dwelling older adults (<i>N</i> = 69, <i>M</i> = 73 years of age) completed the personal computer (PC) and online versions of the UFOV® at baseline and approximately 4 months later (registered at https://osf.io/7utgw). Participants also completed baseline measures of cognitive, motor, and visual function (i.e. Flanker, Timed Up and Go Test, and near visual acuity). Pearson correlations were used to examine the validity and reliability for the total and subtest scores of the online UFOV® version relative to the PC version. Convergent and divergent validity was examined by comparing correlations between both the UFOV® versions and measures of cognitive, motor, and visual function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UFOV® total, divided attention, and selective attention subtest scores of the online and PC versions were significantly correlated with moderate to strong effect sizes, <i>r</i>s = 0.39-0.54, <i>p</i>s < .001, supporting evidence for the validity of the online version. The online and PC versions of UFOV® were similarly related to gait speed, indicating convergent validity. Both versions of the UFOV® were distinct from near visual acuity, indicating divergent validity. The online UFOV® total and selective attention subtest scores from baseline to posttest were significantly correlated, indicating test-retest reliability, <i>r</i>s = 0.64-0.72, <i>p</i>s ≤ .006. Lack of variability among processing speed subtest scores restricted analyses, as performance was highly consistent across time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These data support the validity and reliability of the online UFOV®, particularly for the total and selective attention subtest scores. Future research should confirm the online UFOV® similarly predicts driving and other aspects of functional performance among older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"55-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the online useful field of view test among community-dwelling older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon K Runge, Elizabeth M Hudak, Jade A Sutfin, Victor R Dobrovolskiy, Jerri D Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13803395.2025.2461518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Useful Field of View Test (UFOV®) is a widely used measure of processing speed and visual attention that predicts driving performance and other functional abilities among older adults. We examined the reliability and validity of a new UFOV® version adapted for online administration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Community-dwelling older adults (<i>N</i> = 69, <i>M</i> = 73 years of age) completed the personal computer (PC) and online versions of the UFOV® at baseline and approximately 4 months later (registered at https://osf.io/7utgw). Participants also completed baseline measures of cognitive, motor, and visual function (i.e. Flanker, Timed Up and Go Test, and near visual acuity). Pearson correlations were used to examine the validity and reliability for the total and subtest scores of the online UFOV® version relative to the PC version. Convergent and divergent validity was examined by comparing correlations between both the UFOV® versions and measures of cognitive, motor, and visual function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UFOV® total, divided attention, and selective attention subtest scores of the online and PC versions were significantly correlated with moderate to strong effect sizes, <i>r</i>s = 0.39-0.54, <i>p</i>s < .001, supporting evidence for the validity of the online version. The online and PC versions of UFOV® were similarly related to gait speed, indicating convergent validity. Both versions of the UFOV® were distinct from near visual acuity, indicating divergent validity. The online UFOV® total and selective attention subtest scores from baseline to posttest were significantly correlated, indicating test-retest reliability, <i>r</i>s = 0.64-0.72, <i>p</i>s ≤ .006. Lack of variability among processing speed subtest scores restricted analyses, as performance was highly consistent across time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These data support the validity and reliability of the online UFOV®, particularly for the total and selective attention subtest scores. Future research should confirm the online UFOV® similarly predicts driving and other aspects of functional performance among older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"55-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2461518\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2025.2461518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有用视场测试(UFOV®)是一种广泛使用的测量处理速度和视觉注意力的方法,可以预测老年人的驾驶性能和其他功能能力。我们检查了适用于在线管理的新UFOV®版本的可靠性和有效性。方法:居住在社区的老年人(N = 69, M = 73岁)在基线和大约4个月后(在https://osf.io/7utgw注册)完成了个人电脑(PC)和在线版本的UFOV®。参与者还完成了认知、运动和视觉功能的基线测量(即侧卫测试、计时起跑测试和近视灵敏度)。使用Pearson相关性来检验在线UFOV®版本相对于PC版本的总分数和子测试分数的效度和信度。通过比较UFOV®版本与认知、运动和视觉功能测量之间的相关性来检验收敛效度和发散效度。结果:在线版本和PC版本的UFOV®总、分离注意和选择性注意子测试得分与中至强效应量显著相关,rs = 0.39-0.54, ps < .001,支持在线版本的有效性。UFOV®的在线和PC版本与步态速度相似,表明收敛效度。两个版本的UFOV®是不同于近视力,表明不同的有效性。在线UFOV®总分和选择性注意子测试得分从基线到后测呈显著相关,表明重测信度,rs = 0.64-0.72, ps≤0.006。在处理速度子测试分数之间缺乏可变性限制了分析,因为性能在时间上是高度一致的。讨论:这些数据支持在线UFOV®的有效性和可靠性,特别是对于总注意力和选择性注意力子测试分数。未来的研究应该证实,在线UFOV®同样可以预测老年人的驾驶和其他方面的功能表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of the online useful field of view test among community-dwelling older adults.

Background: The Useful Field of View Test (UFOV®) is a widely used measure of processing speed and visual attention that predicts driving performance and other functional abilities among older adults. We examined the reliability and validity of a new UFOV® version adapted for online administration.

Method: Community-dwelling older adults (N = 69, M = 73 years of age) completed the personal computer (PC) and online versions of the UFOV® at baseline and approximately 4 months later (registered at https://osf.io/7utgw). Participants also completed baseline measures of cognitive, motor, and visual function (i.e. Flanker, Timed Up and Go Test, and near visual acuity). Pearson correlations were used to examine the validity and reliability for the total and subtest scores of the online UFOV® version relative to the PC version. Convergent and divergent validity was examined by comparing correlations between both the UFOV® versions and measures of cognitive, motor, and visual function.

Results: UFOV® total, divided attention, and selective attention subtest scores of the online and PC versions were significantly correlated with moderate to strong effect sizes, rs = 0.39-0.54, ps < .001, supporting evidence for the validity of the online version. The online and PC versions of UFOV® were similarly related to gait speed, indicating convergent validity. Both versions of the UFOV® were distinct from near visual acuity, indicating divergent validity. The online UFOV® total and selective attention subtest scores from baseline to posttest were significantly correlated, indicating test-retest reliability, rs = 0.64-0.72, ps ≤ .006. Lack of variability among processing speed subtest scores restricted analyses, as performance was highly consistent across time.

Discussion: These data support the validity and reliability of the online UFOV®, particularly for the total and selective attention subtest scores. Future research should confirm the online UFOV® similarly predicts driving and other aspects of functional performance among older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信