脑深部刺激前扣带和丘脑治疗慢性难治性神经性疼痛的安全性和可行性:一项试点和随机研究。

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Denys Fontaine, Aurélie Leplus, Anne Donnet, Nelly Darmon, Anne Balossier, Bruno Giordana, Benoit Simonet, Petru Isan, Jean Regis, Michel Lanteri-Minet
{"title":"脑深部刺激前扣带和丘脑治疗慢性难治性神经性疼痛的安全性和可行性:一项试点和随机研究。","authors":"Denys Fontaine, Aurélie Leplus, Anne Donnet, Nelly Darmon, Anne Balossier, Bruno Giordana, Benoit Simonet, Petru Isan, Jean Regis, Michel Lanteri-Minet","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-01967-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the anterior cingulum has been recently proposed to treat refractory chronic pain but its safety and its efficacy have not been evaluated in controlled conditions. Our objective was to evaluate the respective feasibility and safety of sensory thalamus (Thal-DBS) combined with anterior cingulate (ACC-DBS) DBS in patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a bicentric study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942) in patients suffering from medically-refractory chronic unilateral neuropathic pain surgically implanted with both unilateral Thal-DBS and bilateral ACC-DBS, to evaluate successively: Thal-DBS only; combined Thal-DBS and ACC-DBS; ACC-DBS \"on\" and \"off\" stimulation periods in randomized cross-over double-blinded conditions; and a 1-year open phase. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by repeated neurological examination, psychiatric assessment, comprehensive assessment of cognitive and affective functioning. Changes on pain intensity (Visual Analogic Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D scale) were used to evaluate DBS efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients (2 women, 6 men, mean age 52,1) completed the study. Adverse events were: epileptic seizure (2), transient motor or attention (2), persistent gait disturbances (1), sleep disturbances (1). No patient displayed significant cognitive or affective change. Compared to baseline, the quality of life (EQ-5D utility score) was significantly improved during the ACC-DBS \"On\" stimulation period (p = 0,039) and at the end of the study (p = 0,034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study confirmed the safety of anterior cingulate DBS alone or in combination with thalamic stimulation and suggested that it might improve quality of life of patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study has been registered on 20,180,117 (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942).</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834684/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and feasibility of deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate and thalamus in chronic refractory neuropathic pain: a pilot and randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Denys Fontaine, Aurélie Leplus, Anne Donnet, Nelly Darmon, Anne Balossier, Bruno Giordana, Benoit Simonet, Petru Isan, Jean Regis, Michel Lanteri-Minet\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-025-01967-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the anterior cingulum has been recently proposed to treat refractory chronic pain but its safety and its efficacy have not been evaluated in controlled conditions. Our objective was to evaluate the respective feasibility and safety of sensory thalamus (Thal-DBS) combined with anterior cingulate (ACC-DBS) DBS in patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a bicentric study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942) in patients suffering from medically-refractory chronic unilateral neuropathic pain surgically implanted with both unilateral Thal-DBS and bilateral ACC-DBS, to evaluate successively: Thal-DBS only; combined Thal-DBS and ACC-DBS; ACC-DBS \\\"on\\\" and \\\"off\\\" stimulation periods in randomized cross-over double-blinded conditions; and a 1-year open phase. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by repeated neurological examination, psychiatric assessment, comprehensive assessment of cognitive and affective functioning. Changes on pain intensity (Visual Analogic Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D scale) were used to evaluate DBS efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients (2 women, 6 men, mean age 52,1) completed the study. Adverse events were: epileptic seizure (2), transient motor or attention (2), persistent gait disturbances (1), sleep disturbances (1). No patient displayed significant cognitive or affective change. Compared to baseline, the quality of life (EQ-5D utility score) was significantly improved during the ACC-DBS \\\"On\\\" stimulation period (p = 0,039) and at the end of the study (p = 0,034).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study confirmed the safety of anterior cingulate DBS alone or in combination with thalamic stimulation and suggested that it might improve quality of life of patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study has been registered on 20,180,117 (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834684/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-01967-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-01967-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑深部电刺激(DBS)前扣带最近被提出用于治疗难治性慢性疼痛,但其安全性和有效性尚未在对照条件下进行评估。我们的目的是评估感觉丘脑(thalal -DBS)联合前扣带(ACC-DBS) DBS治疗慢性神经性疼痛患者的可行性和安全性。方法:我们进行了一项双中心研究(clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942),在患有难治性单侧慢性神经性疼痛的患者中,手术植入单侧Thal-DBS和双侧ACC-DBS,先后评估:仅Thal-DBS;Thal-DBS联合ACC-DBS;随机交叉双盲条件下ACC-DBS“开启”和“关闭”刺激期;一年的开放阶段。通过反复神经学检查、精神病学评估、认知和情感功能综合评估来评估安全性和有效性。采用疼痛强度(视觉类比量表)和生活质量(EQ-5D量表)的变化来评价DBS的疗效。结果:所有患者(女2例,男6例,平均年龄52,1岁)均完成研究。不良事件包括:癫痫发作(2例)、短暂的运动或注意力(2例)、持续的步态障碍(1例)、睡眠障碍(1例)。没有患者表现出明显的认知或情感变化。与基线相比,在ACC-DBS“开启”刺激期间(p = 0,039)和研究结束时(p = 0,034),生活质量(EQ-5D效用评分)显著改善。结论:本初步研究证实了前扣带DBS单独或联合丘脑刺激的安全性,并提示其可能改善慢性难治性神经性疼痛患者的生活质量。试验注册:该研究已在20,180,117号注册(clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and feasibility of deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate and thalamus in chronic refractory neuropathic pain: a pilot and randomized study.

Background: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the anterior cingulum has been recently proposed to treat refractory chronic pain but its safety and its efficacy have not been evaluated in controlled conditions. Our objective was to evaluate the respective feasibility and safety of sensory thalamus (Thal-DBS) combined with anterior cingulate (ACC-DBS) DBS in patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain.

Methods: We conducted a bicentric study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942) in patients suffering from medically-refractory chronic unilateral neuropathic pain surgically implanted with both unilateral Thal-DBS and bilateral ACC-DBS, to evaluate successively: Thal-DBS only; combined Thal-DBS and ACC-DBS; ACC-DBS "on" and "off" stimulation periods in randomized cross-over double-blinded conditions; and a 1-year open phase. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by repeated neurological examination, psychiatric assessment, comprehensive assessment of cognitive and affective functioning. Changes on pain intensity (Visual Analogic Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D scale) were used to evaluate DBS efficacy.

Results: All the patients (2 women, 6 men, mean age 52,1) completed the study. Adverse events were: epileptic seizure (2), transient motor or attention (2), persistent gait disturbances (1), sleep disturbances (1). No patient displayed significant cognitive or affective change. Compared to baseline, the quality of life (EQ-5D utility score) was significantly improved during the ACC-DBS "On" stimulation period (p = 0,039) and at the end of the study (p = 0,034).

Conclusion: This pilot study confirmed the safety of anterior cingulate DBS alone or in combination with thalamic stimulation and suggested that it might improve quality of life of patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain.

Trial registration: The study has been registered on 20,180,117 (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信