开放标签安慰剂治疗慢性腰痛:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025
Victor Hugo Palhares Flávio-Reis, Yago Marcos Pessoa-Gonçalves, Camilo André Viana Diaz, Antonieta Santos Andrade Lamoglia, Chamberttan Souza Desidério, Carlo José Freire Oliveira
{"title":"开放标签安慰剂治疗慢性腰痛:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Victor Hugo Palhares Flávio-Reis, Yago Marcos Pessoa-Gonçalves, Camilo André Viana Diaz, Antonieta Santos Andrade Lamoglia, Chamberttan Souza Desidério, Carlo José Freire Oliveira","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the therapeutic potential of Open-Label Placebo (OLP) for chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on 12 September 2024. Data extraction focused on follow-up and change-from-baseline data of the placebo or control groups. The effect sizes were calculated using the inverse variance statistical method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A meta-analysis of four articles involving 171 OLP patients and 161 controls demonstrated a modest reduction in pain on the numerical rating scale (Mean difference = -0.62; 95% confidence interval: -1.09 to -0.14; <i>p</i> = 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 31%). However, according to GRADE, the certainty of evidence for this finding is very low due to methodological limitations of the included studies and potential biases. These findings, even if small, suggest potential benefits of OLP for pain reduction, with clinical relevance of the effect size being important depending on the clinical context and the patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OLP demonstrated a reduction in pain, with a slightly greater improvement observed during shorter intervention periods. However, the certainty of this evidence remains very low, indicating that these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future clinical trials are needed to further explore the potential and limitations of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024568302.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"149-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open label placebo for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Hugo Palhares Flávio-Reis, Yago Marcos Pessoa-Gonçalves, Camilo André Viana Diaz, Antonieta Santos Andrade Lamoglia, Chamberttan Souza Desidério, Carlo José Freire Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the therapeutic potential of Open-Label Placebo (OLP) for chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on 12 September 2024. Data extraction focused on follow-up and change-from-baseline data of the placebo or control groups. The effect sizes were calculated using the inverse variance statistical method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A meta-analysis of four articles involving 171 OLP patients and 161 controls demonstrated a modest reduction in pain on the numerical rating scale (Mean difference = -0.62; 95% confidence interval: -1.09 to -0.14; <i>p</i> = 0.01; I<sup>2</sup> = 31%). However, according to GRADE, the certainty of evidence for this finding is very low due to methodological limitations of the included studies and potential biases. These findings, even if small, suggest potential benefits of OLP for pain reduction, with clinical relevance of the effect size being important depending on the clinical context and the patient's perspective.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OLP demonstrated a reduction in pain, with a slightly greater improvement observed during shorter intervention periods. However, the certainty of this evidence remains very low, indicating that these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future clinical trials are needed to further explore the potential and limitations of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024568302.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"149-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881878/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2467025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估开放标签安慰剂(OLP)对慢性腰痛(CLBP)的治疗潜力。材料与方法:于2024年9月12日进行系统文献检索。数据提取侧重于安慰剂组或对照组的随访和基线变化数据。效应量采用反方差统计方法计算。结果:一项涉及171例OLP患者和161例对照的四篇文章的荟萃分析显示,在数值评定量表上,疼痛有适度的减轻(平均差异= -0.62;95%置信区间:-1.09 ~ -0.14;p = 0.01;i2 = 31%)。然而,根据GRADE,由于纳入研究的方法学局限性和潜在的偏倚,这一发现的证据确定性非常低。这些发现,即使很小,也表明OLP对减轻疼痛的潜在益处,其临床相关性取决于临床背景和患者的观点。结论:OLP显示疼痛减轻,在较短的干预期间观察到稍大的改善。然而,这一证据的确定性仍然很低,表明这些发现应谨慎解释。未来的临床试验需要进一步探索这种干预的潜力和局限性。协议注册:www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero标识为CRD42024568302。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Open label placebo for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Aim: To assess the therapeutic potential of Open-Label Placebo (OLP) for chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Materials & methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on 12 September 2024. Data extraction focused on follow-up and change-from-baseline data of the placebo or control groups. The effect sizes were calculated using the inverse variance statistical method.

Results: A meta-analysis of four articles involving 171 OLP patients and 161 controls demonstrated a modest reduction in pain on the numerical rating scale (Mean difference = -0.62; 95% confidence interval: -1.09 to -0.14; p = 0.01; I2 = 31%). However, according to GRADE, the certainty of evidence for this finding is very low due to methodological limitations of the included studies and potential biases. These findings, even if small, suggest potential benefits of OLP for pain reduction, with clinical relevance of the effect size being important depending on the clinical context and the patient's perspective.

Conclusions: OLP demonstrated a reduction in pain, with a slightly greater improvement observed during shorter intervention periods. However, the certainty of this evidence remains very low, indicating that these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Future clinical trials are needed to further explore the potential and limitations of this intervention.

Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024568302.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信