{"title":"胸膜感染:治疗策略之争。","authors":"Ken K P Chan, Estee P M Lau, Y C Gary Lee","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Management of pleural infection remains heterogeneous worldwide. This review highlights current controversies in therapeutic strategies for pleural infection, focusing particularly on recent studies and their implications.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The introduction of intrapleural therapy combining alteplase [a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)] and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) has revolutionized treatment practices, though the optimal delivery and dosing regimen is an area of active investigation. Variations to simplify administration protocols and/or to lower the required drug doses have been published. Most were exploratory studies, but the variations showed maintained therapeutic efficacy.Whether intrapleural alteplase/DNase or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is superior is a topic of debate. Retrospective comparative analyses between the two revealed no clear benefits on all-cause mortality from either approach. Pilot randomized trials have been published and further full-scale, head-to-head trials are underway.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Effective management of pleural infection involves adequate pleural drainage and appropriate antibiotic use. This review outlines the current evidence (and its limitations) and highlights knowledge gaps in optimizing the therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"218-222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pleural infection: controversies on the therapeutic strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Ken K P Chan, Estee P M Lau, Y C Gary Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Management of pleural infection remains heterogeneous worldwide. This review highlights current controversies in therapeutic strategies for pleural infection, focusing particularly on recent studies and their implications.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The introduction of intrapleural therapy combining alteplase [a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)] and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) has revolutionized treatment practices, though the optimal delivery and dosing regimen is an area of active investigation. Variations to simplify administration protocols and/or to lower the required drug doses have been published. Most were exploratory studies, but the variations showed maintained therapeutic efficacy.Whether intrapleural alteplase/DNase or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is superior is a topic of debate. Retrospective comparative analyses between the two revealed no clear benefits on all-cause mortality from either approach. Pilot randomized trials have been published and further full-scale, head-to-head trials are underway.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Effective management of pleural infection involves adequate pleural drainage and appropriate antibiotic use. This review outlines the current evidence (and its limitations) and highlights knowledge gaps in optimizing the therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"218-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pleural infection: controversies on the therapeutic strategies.
Purpose of review: Management of pleural infection remains heterogeneous worldwide. This review highlights current controversies in therapeutic strategies for pleural infection, focusing particularly on recent studies and their implications.
Recent findings: The introduction of intrapleural therapy combining alteplase [a tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)] and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) has revolutionized treatment practices, though the optimal delivery and dosing regimen is an area of active investigation. Variations to simplify administration protocols and/or to lower the required drug doses have been published. Most were exploratory studies, but the variations showed maintained therapeutic efficacy.Whether intrapleural alteplase/DNase or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is superior is a topic of debate. Retrospective comparative analyses between the two revealed no clear benefits on all-cause mortality from either approach. Pilot randomized trials have been published and further full-scale, head-to-head trials are underway.
Summary: Effective management of pleural infection involves adequate pleural drainage and appropriate antibiotic use. This review outlines the current evidence (and its limitations) and highlights knowledge gaps in optimizing the therapeutic strategies.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.