IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
C Steger, S Vanden Broeck, H De Schepper
{"title":"Decision making in technical evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor multidisciplinary team discussion. Will multidisciplinary team discussion change policy?","authors":"C Steger, S Vanden Broeck, H De Schepper","doi":"10.51821/88.1.13210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pelvic floor multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is emerging as a standard part of care for patients with pelvic floor disorders. Although its use is encouraged by guidelines, there is still a lack of solid evidence supporting its benefits. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor MDT discussions on the diagnostic approach and treatment of a patient population at Antwerp University Hospital. After reviewing 26 patient cases, the study demonstrated a change in technical investigations in 69% of cases and a change in diagnostics in 85% of cases. These findings indicate that pelvic floor MDT discussions have a significant impact on both the diagnostic and treatment approaches for pelvic floor disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"88 1","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.1.13210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

盆底多学科小组(MDT)讨论正逐渐成为盆底疾病患者护理的标准组成部分。尽管指南鼓励使用该方法,但仍缺乏确凿证据证明其益处。本研究旨在评估盆底 MDT 讨论对安特卫普大学医院患者诊断方法和治疗的影响。在回顾了 26 例患者的病例后,研究显示 69% 的病例改变了技术检查方法,85% 的病例改变了诊断方法。这些研究结果表明,盆底MDT讨论对盆底疾病的诊断和治疗方法都有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decision making in technical evaluation and treatment of pelvic floor multidisciplinary team discussion. Will multidisciplinary team discussion change policy?

Pelvic floor multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion is emerging as a standard part of care for patients with pelvic floor disorders. Although its use is encouraged by guidelines, there is still a lack of solid evidence supporting its benefits. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor MDT discussions on the diagnostic approach and treatment of a patient population at Antwerp University Hospital. After reviewing 26 patient cases, the study demonstrated a change in technical investigations in 69% of cases and a change in diagnostics in 85% of cases. These findings indicate that pelvic floor MDT discussions have a significant impact on both the diagnostic and treatment approaches for pelvic floor disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信