GOES-R PM2.5评估与偏差校正:一种深度学习方法

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Alqamah Sayeed, Pawan Gupta, Barron Henderson, Shobha Kondragunta, Hai Zhang, Yang Liu
{"title":"GOES-R PM2.5评估与偏差校正:一种深度学习方法","authors":"Alqamah Sayeed,&nbsp;Pawan Gupta,&nbsp;Barron Henderson,&nbsp;Shobha Kondragunta,&nbsp;Hai Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Liu","doi":"10.1029/2024EA004012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Estimating surface-level fine particulate matter from satellite remote sensing can expand the spatial coverage of ground-based monitors. This approach is particularly effective in assessing rapidly changing air pollution events such as wildland fires that often start far away from centralized ground monitors. We developed Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm to improve hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> estimates informed by GOES-R; meteorology forecasts, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> observations from AirNow. The surface-satellite-model collocated data sets for the period of 2020–2021 were used to assess the biases in GOES-GWR PM<sub>2.5</sub> (only operationally available data set) against AirNow measurements at hourly and daily scales. Then a DNN based bias correction algorithm is used to improve the accuracies of GOES-GWR PM<sub>2.5</sub>. The DNN uses GOES-GWR PM<sub>2.5</sub>, GOES-R aerosol parameters, and HRRR meteorological fields as input and AirNow PM<sub>2.5</sub> is used as target variable. The application of DNN reduced the PM<sub>2.5</sub> biases as compared to GOES-GWR estimates. RMSE was also reduced to 6.55 μg/m<sup>3</sup> from 8.72 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in GOES-GWR estimates. The DNN model was also evaluated on two sets of independent data sets for its robustness. In the first independent data set for the first half of 2020, ∼89% of stations show an increase in correlation (<i>r</i>) and, ∼76% and ∼62% of stations show a reduction in bias. The IOA and <i>r</i> for the independent data were 0.77 and 0.61 (GWR: 0.68 and 0.53) and RMSE was 4.48 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (GWR = 6.13 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) for the same period. The algorithm will be operationally deployed by NOAA and US-EPA to estimate surface level PM<sub>2.5</sub> from satellite derived Aerosol optical depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA004012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GOES-R PM2.5 Evaluation and Bias Correction: A Deep Learning Approach\",\"authors\":\"Alqamah Sayeed,&nbsp;Pawan Gupta,&nbsp;Barron Henderson,&nbsp;Shobha Kondragunta,&nbsp;Hai Zhang,&nbsp;Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024EA004012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Estimating surface-level fine particulate matter from satellite remote sensing can expand the spatial coverage of ground-based monitors. This approach is particularly effective in assessing rapidly changing air pollution events such as wildland fires that often start far away from centralized ground monitors. We developed Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm to improve hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> estimates informed by GOES-R; meteorology forecasts, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> observations from AirNow. The surface-satellite-model collocated data sets for the period of 2020–2021 were used to assess the biases in GOES-GWR PM<sub>2.5</sub> (only operationally available data set) against AirNow measurements at hourly and daily scales. Then a DNN based bias correction algorithm is used to improve the accuracies of GOES-GWR PM<sub>2.5</sub>. The DNN uses GOES-GWR PM<sub>2.5</sub>, GOES-R aerosol parameters, and HRRR meteorological fields as input and AirNow PM<sub>2.5</sub> is used as target variable. The application of DNN reduced the PM<sub>2.5</sub> biases as compared to GOES-GWR estimates. RMSE was also reduced to 6.55 μg/m<sup>3</sup> from 8.72 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in GOES-GWR estimates. The DNN model was also evaluated on two sets of independent data sets for its robustness. In the first independent data set for the first half of 2020, ∼89% of stations show an increase in correlation (<i>r</i>) and, ∼76% and ∼62% of stations show a reduction in bias. The IOA and <i>r</i> for the independent data were 0.77 and 0.61 (GWR: 0.68 and 0.53) and RMSE was 4.48 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (GWR = 6.13 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) for the same period. The algorithm will be operationally deployed by NOAA and US-EPA to estimate surface level PM<sub>2.5</sub> from satellite derived Aerosol optical depth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth and Space Science\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EA004012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth and Space Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA004012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EA004012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过卫星遥感估算地表细颗粒物可以扩大地面监测的空间覆盖范围。这种方法在评估快速变化的空气污染事件时特别有效,比如经常远离中央地面监测仪的野火。我们开发了深度神经网络(DNN)算法来改进GOES-R提供的每小时PM2.5估计;气象预报,以及AirNow的PM2.5观测数据。使用2020-2021年期间的地面-卫星模型配置数据集来评估GOES-GWR PM2.5(仅可操作的数据集)与AirNow每小时和每日测量值的偏差。然后采用基于深度神经网络的偏差校正算法提高GOES-GWR PM2.5的精度。DNN以GOES-GWR PM2.5、GOES-R气溶胶参数和HRRR气象场为输入,以AirNow PM2.5为目标变量。与GOES-GWR估计相比,DNN的应用减少了PM2.5的偏差。均方根误差也从GOES-GWR估计的8.72 μg/m3降至6.55 μg/m3。DNN模型还在两组独立数据集上进行了鲁棒性评估。在2020年上半年的第一个独立数据集中,约89%的台站显示相关性(r)增加,约76%和62%的台站显示偏差减少。同期独立资料的IOA和r分别为0.77和0.61 (GWR分别为0.68和0.53),RMSE为4.48 μg/m3 (GWR分别为6.13 μg/m3)。该算法将由NOAA和US-EPA实际部署,用于根据卫星气溶胶光学深度估算地表PM2.5水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

GOES-R PM2.5 Evaluation and Bias Correction: A Deep Learning Approach

GOES-R PM2.5 Evaluation and Bias Correction: A Deep Learning Approach

Estimating surface-level fine particulate matter from satellite remote sensing can expand the spatial coverage of ground-based monitors. This approach is particularly effective in assessing rapidly changing air pollution events such as wildland fires that often start far away from centralized ground monitors. We developed Deep Neural Network (DNN) algorithm to improve hourly PM2.5 estimates informed by GOES-R; meteorology forecasts, and PM2.5 observations from AirNow. The surface-satellite-model collocated data sets for the period of 2020–2021 were used to assess the biases in GOES-GWR PM2.5 (only operationally available data set) against AirNow measurements at hourly and daily scales. Then a DNN based bias correction algorithm is used to improve the accuracies of GOES-GWR PM2.5. The DNN uses GOES-GWR PM2.5, GOES-R aerosol parameters, and HRRR meteorological fields as input and AirNow PM2.5 is used as target variable. The application of DNN reduced the PM2.5 biases as compared to GOES-GWR estimates. RMSE was also reduced to 6.55 μg/m3 from 8.72 μg/m3 in GOES-GWR estimates. The DNN model was also evaluated on two sets of independent data sets for its robustness. In the first independent data set for the first half of 2020, ∼89% of stations show an increase in correlation (r) and, ∼76% and ∼62% of stations show a reduction in bias. The IOA and r for the independent data were 0.77 and 0.61 (GWR: 0.68 and 0.53) and RMSE was 4.48 μg/m3 (GWR = 6.13 μg/m3) for the same period. The algorithm will be operationally deployed by NOAA and US-EPA to estimate surface level PM2.5 from satellite derived Aerosol optical depth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信