Libo Luo, Rui Xia, Shiqi Mao, Qian Liu, He Du, Tao Jiang, Shuo Yang, Yan Wang, Wei Li, Fei Zhou, Jia Yu, Guanghui Gao, Xuefei Li, Chao Zhao, Lei Cheng, Jingyun Shi, Xiaoxia Chen, Caicun Zhou, Luonan Chen, Shengxiang Ren, Fengying Wu
{"title":"MYC-Notch轴的差异表达驱动对中枢性和外周广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的不同反应","authors":"Libo Luo, Rui Xia, Shiqi Mao, Qian Liu, He Du, Tao Jiang, Shuo Yang, Yan Wang, Wei Li, Fei Zhou, Jia Yu, Guanghui Gao, Xuefei Li, Chao Zhao, Lei Cheng, Jingyun Shi, Xiaoxia Chen, Caicun Zhou, Luonan Chen, Shengxiang Ren, Fengying Wu","doi":"10.1002/mco2.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Central and peripheral extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are reported to be two distinct tumor entities, but their responses to the front-line therapies and underlying biological mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we first compared the outcomes of central and peripheral ES-SCLC receiving front-line chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy with a cohort of 265 patients. Then we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on nine treatment-naïve ES-SCLC samples to investigate potential mechanisms underlying the response differences. Under chemotherapy, the peripheral type had a lower objective response rate (44.8% vs. 71.2%, <i>p </i>= 0.008) and shorter progression-free survival (median 3.4 vs. 5.1 months, <i>p </i>= 0.001) than the central type. When comparing chemo-immunotherapy with chemotherapy, the peripheral type showed a greater potential to reduce progression (HR, 0.18 and 0.52, respectively) and death (HR, 0.44 and 0.91 respectively) risks than the central type. Concerning the scRNA-seq data, the peripheral type was associated with chemo-resistant and immune-responsive tumoral and microenvironmental features, including a higher expression level of MYC-Notch-non-neuroendocrine (MYC-Notch-non-NE) axis and a more potent antigen presentation and immune activation status. Our results revealed that central and peripheral ES-SCLC had distinct responses to front-line treatments, potentially due to differential activation statuses of the MYC-Notch-non-NE axis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94133,"journal":{"name":"MedComm","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.70112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential expression of the MYC-Notch axis drives divergent responses to the front-line therapy in central and peripheral extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer\",\"authors\":\"Libo Luo, Rui Xia, Shiqi Mao, Qian Liu, He Du, Tao Jiang, Shuo Yang, Yan Wang, Wei Li, Fei Zhou, Jia Yu, Guanghui Gao, Xuefei Li, Chao Zhao, Lei Cheng, Jingyun Shi, Xiaoxia Chen, Caicun Zhou, Luonan Chen, Shengxiang Ren, Fengying Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mco2.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Central and peripheral extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are reported to be two distinct tumor entities, but their responses to the front-line therapies and underlying biological mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we first compared the outcomes of central and peripheral ES-SCLC receiving front-line chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy with a cohort of 265 patients. Then we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on nine treatment-naïve ES-SCLC samples to investigate potential mechanisms underlying the response differences. Under chemotherapy, the peripheral type had a lower objective response rate (44.8% vs. 71.2%, <i>p </i>= 0.008) and shorter progression-free survival (median 3.4 vs. 5.1 months, <i>p </i>= 0.001) than the central type. When comparing chemo-immunotherapy with chemotherapy, the peripheral type showed a greater potential to reduce progression (HR, 0.18 and 0.52, respectively) and death (HR, 0.44 and 0.91 respectively) risks than the central type. Concerning the scRNA-seq data, the peripheral type was associated with chemo-resistant and immune-responsive tumoral and microenvironmental features, including a higher expression level of MYC-Notch-non-neuroendocrine (MYC-Notch-non-NE) axis and a more potent antigen presentation and immune activation status. Our results revealed that central and peripheral ES-SCLC had distinct responses to front-line treatments, potentially due to differential activation statuses of the MYC-Notch-non-NE axis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedComm\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mco2.70112\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedComm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.70112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedComm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mco2.70112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
据报道,中央和外周广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)是两种不同的肿瘤实体,但它们对一线治疗的反应和潜在的生物学机制尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们首先比较了265例中枢性和外周性ES-SCLC接受一线化疗或化疗免疫治疗的结果。然后,我们对9个treatment-naïve ES-SCLC样本进行了单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq),以研究反应差异的潜在机制。在化疗下,外周型患者的客观缓解率较低(44.8% vs. 71.2%, p = 0.008),无进展生存期较短(中位3.4 vs. 5.1个月,p = 0.001)。当比较化疗免疫治疗与化疗时,与中心型相比,外周型表现出更大的降低进展(HR分别为0.18和0.52)和死亡(HR分别为0.44和0.91)风险的潜力。根据scRNA-seq数据,外周型与化疗耐药和免疫应答性肿瘤和微环境特征相关,包括myc - notch -非神经内分泌(myc - notch -非ne)轴的高表达水平和更有效的抗原呈递和免疫激活状态。我们的研究结果显示,中央和外周ES-SCLC对一线治疗有不同的反应,可能是由于MYC-Notch-non-NE轴的不同激活状态。
Differential expression of the MYC-Notch axis drives divergent responses to the front-line therapy in central and peripheral extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer
Central and peripheral extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are reported to be two distinct tumor entities, but their responses to the front-line therapies and underlying biological mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we first compared the outcomes of central and peripheral ES-SCLC receiving front-line chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy with a cohort of 265 patients. Then we performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on nine treatment-naïve ES-SCLC samples to investigate potential mechanisms underlying the response differences. Under chemotherapy, the peripheral type had a lower objective response rate (44.8% vs. 71.2%, p = 0.008) and shorter progression-free survival (median 3.4 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.001) than the central type. When comparing chemo-immunotherapy with chemotherapy, the peripheral type showed a greater potential to reduce progression (HR, 0.18 and 0.52, respectively) and death (HR, 0.44 and 0.91 respectively) risks than the central type. Concerning the scRNA-seq data, the peripheral type was associated with chemo-resistant and immune-responsive tumoral and microenvironmental features, including a higher expression level of MYC-Notch-non-neuroendocrine (MYC-Notch-non-NE) axis and a more potent antigen presentation and immune activation status. Our results revealed that central and peripheral ES-SCLC had distinct responses to front-line treatments, potentially due to differential activation statuses of the MYC-Notch-non-NE axis.