使用限制平均生存时间回归的个体参与者数据的时间到事件终点的网络元分析

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Kaiyuan Hua, Xiaofei Wang, Hwanhee Hong
{"title":"使用限制平均生存时间回归的个体参与者数据的时间到事件终点的网络元分析","authors":"Kaiyuan Hua,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wang,&nbsp;Hwanhee Hong","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Network meta-analysis (NMA) extends pairwise meta-analysis to compare multiple treatments simultaneously by combining “direct” and “indirect” comparisons of treatments. The availability of individual participant data (IPD) makes it possible to evaluate treatment effect moderation and to draw inferences about treatment effects by taking the full utilization of individual covariates from multiple clinical trials. In IPD-NMA, restricted mean survival time (RMST) models have gained popularity when analyzing time-to-event outcomes because RMST models offer more straightforward interpretations of treatment effects with fewer assumptions than hazard ratios commonly estimated from Cox models. Existing approaches estimate RMST within each study and then combine by using aggregate-level NMA methods. However, these methods cannot incorporate individual covariates to evaluate the effect moderation. In this paper, we propose advanced RMST NMA models when IPD are available. Our models allow us to study treatment effect moderation and provide a comprehensive understanding about comparative effectiveness of treatments and subgroup effects. The methods are evaluated by an extensive simulation study and illustrated using a real NMA example about treatments for patients with atrial fibrillation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Meta-Analysis of Time-to-Event Endpoints With Individual Participant Data Using Restricted Mean Survival Time Regression\",\"authors\":\"Kaiyuan Hua,&nbsp;Xiaofei Wang,&nbsp;Hwanhee Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bimj.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Network meta-analysis (NMA) extends pairwise meta-analysis to compare multiple treatments simultaneously by combining “direct” and “indirect” comparisons of treatments. The availability of individual participant data (IPD) makes it possible to evaluate treatment effect moderation and to draw inferences about treatment effects by taking the full utilization of individual covariates from multiple clinical trials. In IPD-NMA, restricted mean survival time (RMST) models have gained popularity when analyzing time-to-event outcomes because RMST models offer more straightforward interpretations of treatment effects with fewer assumptions than hazard ratios commonly estimated from Cox models. Existing approaches estimate RMST within each study and then combine by using aggregate-level NMA methods. However, these methods cannot incorporate individual covariates to evaluate the effect moderation. In this paper, we propose advanced RMST NMA models when IPD are available. Our models allow us to study treatment effect moderation and provide a comprehensive understanding about comparative effectiveness of treatments and subgroup effects. The methods are evaluated by an extensive simulation study and illustrated using a real NMA example about treatments for patients with atrial fibrillation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70037\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络元分析(NMA)扩展了两两元分析,通过结合“直接”和“间接”的治疗比较来同时比较多种治疗。个体参与者数据(IPD)的可用性使评估治疗效果的适度性成为可能,并通过充分利用来自多个临床试验的个体协变量来推断治疗效果。在IPD-NMA中,限制平均生存时间(RMST)模型在分析时间到事件结果时越来越受欢迎,因为RMST模型比Cox模型通常估计的风险比提供更直接的治疗效果解释,假设更少。现有的方法估计每个研究中的RMST,然后使用聚合级NMA方法进行组合。然而,这些方法不能纳入单个协变量来评估效果的适度性。在本文中,我们提出了在IPD可用时的先进RMST NMA模型。我们的模型使我们能够研究治疗效果的适度性,并对治疗和亚组效应的比较有效性提供全面的了解。通过广泛的模拟研究对这些方法进行了评估,并使用一个关于房颤患者治疗的真实NMA示例进行了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Network Meta-Analysis of Time-to-Event Endpoints With Individual Participant Data Using Restricted Mean Survival Time Regression

Network meta-analysis (NMA) extends pairwise meta-analysis to compare multiple treatments simultaneously by combining “direct” and “indirect” comparisons of treatments. The availability of individual participant data (IPD) makes it possible to evaluate treatment effect moderation and to draw inferences about treatment effects by taking the full utilization of individual covariates from multiple clinical trials. In IPD-NMA, restricted mean survival time (RMST) models have gained popularity when analyzing time-to-event outcomes because RMST models offer more straightforward interpretations of treatment effects with fewer assumptions than hazard ratios commonly estimated from Cox models. Existing approaches estimate RMST within each study and then combine by using aggregate-level NMA methods. However, these methods cannot incorporate individual covariates to evaluate the effect moderation. In this paper, we propose advanced RMST NMA models when IPD are available. Our models allow us to study treatment effect moderation and provide a comprehensive understanding about comparative effectiveness of treatments and subgroup effects. The methods are evaluated by an extensive simulation study and illustrated using a real NMA example about treatments for patients with atrial fibrillation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信