电池电和氢电多单元在一个站点的可再生能源集成的帕累托优化

IF 3.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Stefan Arens, Alexander Windt, Christoph Streuling, Benedikt Hanke
{"title":"电池电和氢电多单元在一个站点的可再生能源集成的帕累托优化","authors":"Stefan Arens,&nbsp;Alexander Windt,&nbsp;Christoph Streuling,&nbsp;Benedikt Hanke","doi":"10.1002/ese3.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Battery- and hydrogen-powered trains are emerging technologies that have the potential to play a key role in the decarbonization of railway lines for which full trackside electrification is not feasible. In this study, we examine Pareto-optimal energy supply concepts for a specific location along the Cologne–Gerolstein railway line. We investigate two supply concepts, one for battery trains making use of overhead line islands (OHLIs), referred to as the <i>OHLI supply concept</i>, and another for hydrogen trains that make use of hydrogen refueling station (HRSs), referred to as the <i>HRS supply concept</i>. The public grid, as well as renewable energy sources such as wind and PV energy, are considered sources of electrical energy supply. The sizing of these takes into account storage technologies and load time series specific to each supply concept. Simulation models are defined to evaluate the characteristics of an OHLI and HRS supply concept located in a small town (Gerolstein, Germany). Our findings indicate that the HRS supply concept results in more than twice the cost per MWh (111%/MWh higher) compared to the OHLI supply concept. However, the HRS supply concept achieves a 24.7% higher degree of self-sufficiency. Furthermore, the HRS supply concept requires a larger energy system in terms of installed renewable power and storage capacity. This enables the HRS to supply the entire line with energy, whereas the OHLI supply concept covers only a share of the overall energy demand of battery trains at the location under consideration. The remaining energy demand is covered by existing overhead lines or OHLI at another location.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 2","pages":"582-597"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pareto Optimization of the Integration of Renewables for the Supply of Battery-Electric and Hydrogen-Electric Multiple Units at a Single Site\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Arens,&nbsp;Alexander Windt,&nbsp;Christoph Streuling,&nbsp;Benedikt Hanke\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ese3.2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Battery- and hydrogen-powered trains are emerging technologies that have the potential to play a key role in the decarbonization of railway lines for which full trackside electrification is not feasible. In this study, we examine Pareto-optimal energy supply concepts for a specific location along the Cologne–Gerolstein railway line. We investigate two supply concepts, one for battery trains making use of overhead line islands (OHLIs), referred to as the <i>OHLI supply concept</i>, and another for hydrogen trains that make use of hydrogen refueling station (HRSs), referred to as the <i>HRS supply concept</i>. The public grid, as well as renewable energy sources such as wind and PV energy, are considered sources of electrical energy supply. The sizing of these takes into account storage technologies and load time series specific to each supply concept. Simulation models are defined to evaluate the characteristics of an OHLI and HRS supply concept located in a small town (Gerolstein, Germany). Our findings indicate that the HRS supply concept results in more than twice the cost per MWh (111%/MWh higher) compared to the OHLI supply concept. However, the HRS supply concept achieves a 24.7% higher degree of self-sufficiency. Furthermore, the HRS supply concept requires a larger energy system in terms of installed renewable power and storage capacity. This enables the HRS to supply the entire line with energy, whereas the OHLI supply concept covers only a share of the overall energy demand of battery trains at the location under consideration. The remaining energy demand is covered by existing overhead lines or OHLI at another location.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"582-597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.2018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.2018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电池和氢动力列车是新兴技术,有可能在铁路脱碳方面发挥关键作用,因为完全的轨道旁电气化是不可行的。在本研究中,我们研究了沿科隆-格罗尔施泰因铁路线特定位置的帕累托最优能源供应概念。我们研究了两种供应概念,一种是使用架空线路岛(OHLI)的电池列车,称为OHLI供应概念,另一种是使用加氢站(HRSs)的氢列车,称为HRS供应概念。公共电网,以及可再生能源,如风能和光伏能源,被认为是电力供应的来源。这些尺寸考虑到存储技术和负载时间序列具体到每个供应概念。定义了仿真模型来评估位于一个小镇(Gerolstein,德国)的OHLI和HRS供应概念的特征。我们的研究结果表明,与OHLI供应概念相比,HRS供应概念的每兆瓦时成本(高出111%/兆瓦时)是OHLI供应概念的两倍多。然而,HRS供应概念实现了24.7%的自给自足程度。此外,HRS供应概念需要一个更大的能源系统来安装可再生能源和储存能力。这使得HRS能够为整条线路提供能源,而OHLI供应概念仅涵盖所考虑地点电池列车总体能源需求的一部分。剩余的能源需求由现有架空线路或另一地点的OHLI供电。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pareto Optimization of the Integration of Renewables for the Supply of Battery-Electric and Hydrogen-Electric Multiple Units at a Single Site

Pareto Optimization of the Integration of Renewables for the Supply of Battery-Electric and Hydrogen-Electric Multiple Units at a Single Site

Battery- and hydrogen-powered trains are emerging technologies that have the potential to play a key role in the decarbonization of railway lines for which full trackside electrification is not feasible. In this study, we examine Pareto-optimal energy supply concepts for a specific location along the Cologne–Gerolstein railway line. We investigate two supply concepts, one for battery trains making use of overhead line islands (OHLIs), referred to as the OHLI supply concept, and another for hydrogen trains that make use of hydrogen refueling station (HRSs), referred to as the HRS supply concept. The public grid, as well as renewable energy sources such as wind and PV energy, are considered sources of electrical energy supply. The sizing of these takes into account storage technologies and load time series specific to each supply concept. Simulation models are defined to evaluate the characteristics of an OHLI and HRS supply concept located in a small town (Gerolstein, Germany). Our findings indicate that the HRS supply concept results in more than twice the cost per MWh (111%/MWh higher) compared to the OHLI supply concept. However, the HRS supply concept achieves a 24.7% higher degree of self-sufficiency. Furthermore, the HRS supply concept requires a larger energy system in terms of installed renewable power and storage capacity. This enables the HRS to supply the entire line with energy, whereas the OHLI supply concept covers only a share of the overall energy demand of battery trains at the location under consideration. The remaining energy demand is covered by existing overhead lines or OHLI at another location.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Science & Engineering
Energy Science & Engineering Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.90%
发文量
298
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信