IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
G.A. Veldhuis (Guido) , E.M. Smits-Clijsen (Eefje) , R.P.M. van Waas (Rob) , T. Hof (Tineke) , V. Maccatrozzo (Valentina) , E.A.J.A. Rouwette (Etiënne) , J.H. Kerstholt (José)
{"title":"The influence of causal loop diagrams on systems thinking and information utilization in complex problem-solving","authors":"G.A. Veldhuis (Guido) ,&nbsp;E.M. Smits-Clijsen (Eefje) ,&nbsp;R.P.M. van Waas (Rob) ,&nbsp;T. Hof (Tineke) ,&nbsp;V. Maccatrozzo (Valentina) ,&nbsp;E.A.J.A. Rouwette (Etiënne) ,&nbsp;J.H. Kerstholt (José)","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective communication tools are essential for computer-aided approaches to policy analysis and design. The System Dynamics approach relies on model diagrams, such as Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs), to communicate findings to clients. Despite their importance, there has been limited examination of the effectiveness of such diagrams in supporting professionals' reasoning about complex problems. In this study, we employed a mixed-method design with two sequential stimuli (CLD/Text or Text/CLD) to examine the impact of CLDs on professionals' (N = 14) ability to engage in systems thinking and information utilization. Through a case study on youth crime, utilizing a think-aloud method, we prompted police and municipal professionals to articulate their understanding of the problem's causes and the potential impact of an intervention. Additionally, we explored the influence of self-efficacy, response efficacy, and the need for cognition. Findings suggest that presenting a CLD following textual information enhances systems thinking and information utilization. We discuss implications and potential directions for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100613"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的交流工具对于计算机辅助的政策分析和设计方法至关重要。系统动力学方法依赖于模型图,如因果循环图(CLD),来向客户传达研究结果。尽管这些图表非常重要,但在支持专业人员推理复杂问题方面,对其有效性的研究却非常有限。在本研究中,我们采用了一种混合方法设计,通过两种连续刺激(CLD/文本或文本/CLD)来考察 CLD 对专业人员(14 人)进行系统思考和信息利用能力的影响。通过一项有关青少年犯罪的案例研究,我们采用了 "思考-朗读 "的方法,促使警察和市政专业人员阐明他们对问题成因的理解以及干预措施的潜在影响。此外,我们还探讨了自我效能感、反应效能感和认知需求的影响。研究结果表明,在文本信息之后呈现 CLD 可以增强系统思维和信息利用。我们讨论了未来研究的意义和潜在方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of causal loop diagrams on systems thinking and information utilization in complex problem-solving
Effective communication tools are essential for computer-aided approaches to policy analysis and design. The System Dynamics approach relies on model diagrams, such as Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs), to communicate findings to clients. Despite their importance, there has been limited examination of the effectiveness of such diagrams in supporting professionals' reasoning about complex problems. In this study, we employed a mixed-method design with two sequential stimuli (CLD/Text or Text/CLD) to examine the impact of CLDs on professionals' (N = 14) ability to engage in systems thinking and information utilization. Through a case study on youth crime, utilizing a think-aloud method, we prompted police and municipal professionals to articulate their understanding of the problem's causes and the potential impact of an intervention. Additionally, we explored the influence of self-efficacy, response efficacy, and the need for cognition. Findings suggest that presenting a CLD following textual information enhances systems thinking and information utilization. We discuss implications and potential directions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信