{"title":"无辜嫌疑人披露关键信息的意愿:检验可能证据意识和与犯罪无关行为类型的影响","authors":"Franziska Clemens , Tuule Grolig","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This imaginary mock-crime study examined how awareness of possible evidence influences innocent suspects' (<em>N</em> = 160) willingness to disclose critical information. Specifically, we tested the impact of (a) type of crime-unrelated act participants imagined having executed at the crime scene (lawful vs. unlawful) and (b) information about the possibility that surveillance camera evidence was available from the crime scene (informed vs. not informed). Unlawful (vs. lawful) act suspects were significantly less willing to disclose critical information about their actions and true intentions. As predicted, the awareness of possible evidence did not significantly impact lawful act suspects’ disclosure willingness. Contradicting the predictions, no significant differences occurred between informed and uninformed unlawful act suspects. The level of stress informed unlawful act suspects experienced in conjunction with the possibility of existing evidence was positively correlated to their willingness to disclose critical information about their true intentions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 100733"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innocent suspects’ willingness to disclose critical information: Examining the impact of awareness of possible evidence and type of crime-unrelated act\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Clemens , Tuule Grolig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This imaginary mock-crime study examined how awareness of possible evidence influences innocent suspects' (<em>N</em> = 160) willingness to disclose critical information. Specifically, we tested the impact of (a) type of crime-unrelated act participants imagined having executed at the crime scene (lawful vs. unlawful) and (b) information about the possibility that surveillance camera evidence was available from the crime scene (informed vs. not informed). Unlawful (vs. lawful) act suspects were significantly less willing to disclose critical information about their actions and true intentions. As predicted, the awareness of possible evidence did not significantly impact lawful act suspects’ disclosure willingness. Contradicting the predictions, no significant differences occurred between informed and uninformed unlawful act suspects. The level of stress informed unlawful act suspects experienced in conjunction with the possibility of existing evidence was positively correlated to their willingness to disclose critical information about their true intentions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100733\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061625000096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061625000096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Innocent suspects’ willingness to disclose critical information: Examining the impact of awareness of possible evidence and type of crime-unrelated act
This imaginary mock-crime study examined how awareness of possible evidence influences innocent suspects' (N = 160) willingness to disclose critical information. Specifically, we tested the impact of (a) type of crime-unrelated act participants imagined having executed at the crime scene (lawful vs. unlawful) and (b) information about the possibility that surveillance camera evidence was available from the crime scene (informed vs. not informed). Unlawful (vs. lawful) act suspects were significantly less willing to disclose critical information about their actions and true intentions. As predicted, the awareness of possible evidence did not significantly impact lawful act suspects’ disclosure willingness. Contradicting the predictions, no significant differences occurred between informed and uninformed unlawful act suspects. The level of stress informed unlawful act suspects experienced in conjunction with the possibility of existing evidence was positively correlated to their willingness to disclose critical information about their true intentions.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice is an international and fully peer reviewed journal which welcomes high quality, theoretically informed papers on a wide range of fields linked to criminological research and analysis. It invites submissions relating to: Studies of crime and interpretations of forms and dimensions of criminality; Analyses of criminological debates and contested theoretical frameworks of criminological analysis; Research and analysis of criminal justice and penal policy and practices; Research and analysis of policing policies and policing forms and practices. We particularly welcome submissions relating to more recent and emerging areas of criminological enquiry including cyber-enabled crime, fraud-related crime, terrorism and hate crime.