用再生轮胎钢和聚合物纤维代替人造纤维的超高温frp材料的工程性能和可持续性评价

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jun Shi , Jiyang Shen
{"title":"用再生轮胎钢和聚合物纤维代替人造纤维的超高温frp材料的工程性能和可持续性评价","authors":"Jun Shi ,&nbsp;Jiyang Shen","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims at achieving eco-efficient ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) by substituting manufactured copper-plated steel fiber (CPSF) with recycled tyre steel fiber (RTSF), and polypropylene fiber (PPF) with recycled tyre polymer fiber (RTPF). A total of sixteen UHPFRC mixes with varying substitution rates from 0 % to 75 % were examined regarding their workability, compressive strength, flexural performance, and dry shrinkage, so as to explore their development characteristics and reinforcement mechanisms. The incorporation of RTSF and RTPF led to a decrease in workability and compressive strength, which can be attributed to the shape, surface characteristics, size, length, and residual rubber of RTSF and RTPF. When the substitution rates of RTSF and RTPF exceeded 50 %, the compressive strength exhibited a significant reduction falling below 120 MPa. The experimental investigation of flexural performance demonstrated that the bridging ability of RTSF delayed the bending fracture process and peak load, as well as improved toughening, while RTPF weakened the effects to a certain extent. Besides, a substitution rate of less than 75 % effectively mitigated dry shrinkage, while the substitution of RTPF exacerbated this phenomenon. Finally, the carbon emission performance index, cost performance index, and desirability function were introduced to assess the environmental and economic benefits, and optimal fiber substitution ratios were identified as 50 %RTSF for single-type fiber substitution and a combination of 50 % RTSF and 25 % RTPF for dual-type fiber substitution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"468 ","pages":"Article 140440"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engineering properties and sustainability assessment of UHPFRC incorporating recycled tyre steel and polymer fibers as substitutes for manufactured fibers\",\"authors\":\"Jun Shi ,&nbsp;Jiyang Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study aims at achieving eco-efficient ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) by substituting manufactured copper-plated steel fiber (CPSF) with recycled tyre steel fiber (RTSF), and polypropylene fiber (PPF) with recycled tyre polymer fiber (RTPF). A total of sixteen UHPFRC mixes with varying substitution rates from 0 % to 75 % were examined regarding their workability, compressive strength, flexural performance, and dry shrinkage, so as to explore their development characteristics and reinforcement mechanisms. The incorporation of RTSF and RTPF led to a decrease in workability and compressive strength, which can be attributed to the shape, surface characteristics, size, length, and residual rubber of RTSF and RTPF. When the substitution rates of RTSF and RTPF exceeded 50 %, the compressive strength exhibited a significant reduction falling below 120 MPa. The experimental investigation of flexural performance demonstrated that the bridging ability of RTSF delayed the bending fracture process and peak load, as well as improved toughening, while RTPF weakened the effects to a certain extent. Besides, a substitution rate of less than 75 % effectively mitigated dry shrinkage, while the substitution of RTPF exacerbated this phenomenon. Finally, the carbon emission performance index, cost performance index, and desirability function were introduced to assess the environmental and economic benefits, and optimal fiber substitution ratios were identified as 50 %RTSF for single-type fiber substitution and a combination of 50 % RTSF and 25 % RTPF for dual-type fiber substitution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"468 \",\"pages\":\"Article 140440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825005884\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825005884","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过用回收的轮胎钢纤维(RTSF)代替人造镀铜钢纤维(CPSF),用回收的轮胎聚合物纤维(RTPF)代替聚丙烯纤维(PPF),实现生态高效的超高性能纤维增强混凝土(UHPFRC)。研究了16种取代率从0 %到75 %不等的UHPFRC混合料的和易性、抗压强度、抗弯性能和干收缩性能,探讨了其发育特征和增强机理。RTSF和RTPF的掺入导致可加工性和抗压强度下降,这与RTSF和RTPF的形状、表面特性、尺寸、长度和残余橡胶有关。当RTSF和RTPF的替代率超过50 %时,抗压强度显著降低,降至120 MPa以下。弯曲性能实验研究表明,RTSF的桥接能力延缓了弯曲断裂过程和峰值载荷,提高了增韧效果,而RTPF在一定程度上削弱了这一作用。此外,替代率低于75% %可有效缓解干收缩,而RTPF的替代则加剧了这一现象。最后,引入碳排放性能指标、成本性能指标和期望函数对环境效益和经济效益进行评价,确定单型纤维替代的最佳纤维替代比例为50 %RTSF,双型纤维替代的最佳纤维替代比例为50 %RTSF和25 % RTPF的组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engineering properties and sustainability assessment of UHPFRC incorporating recycled tyre steel and polymer fibers as substitutes for manufactured fibers
This study aims at achieving eco-efficient ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) by substituting manufactured copper-plated steel fiber (CPSF) with recycled tyre steel fiber (RTSF), and polypropylene fiber (PPF) with recycled tyre polymer fiber (RTPF). A total of sixteen UHPFRC mixes with varying substitution rates from 0 % to 75 % were examined regarding their workability, compressive strength, flexural performance, and dry shrinkage, so as to explore their development characteristics and reinforcement mechanisms. The incorporation of RTSF and RTPF led to a decrease in workability and compressive strength, which can be attributed to the shape, surface characteristics, size, length, and residual rubber of RTSF and RTPF. When the substitution rates of RTSF and RTPF exceeded 50 %, the compressive strength exhibited a significant reduction falling below 120 MPa. The experimental investigation of flexural performance demonstrated that the bridging ability of RTSF delayed the bending fracture process and peak load, as well as improved toughening, while RTPF weakened the effects to a certain extent. Besides, a substitution rate of less than 75 % effectively mitigated dry shrinkage, while the substitution of RTPF exacerbated this phenomenon. Finally, the carbon emission performance index, cost performance index, and desirability function were introduced to assess the environmental and economic benefits, and optimal fiber substitution ratios were identified as 50 %RTSF for single-type fiber substitution and a combination of 50 % RTSF and 25 % RTPF for dual-type fiber substitution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信