Nana Owusu M. Essel MD, MSc, MPH , Stephanie Couperthwaite BSc , Esther H. Yang MEng , Steven Fisher MD , Brian H. Rowe MD, MSc
{"title":"妊娠早期出血患者急诊:不同模型预测妊娠成功的比较","authors":"Nana Owusu M. Essel MD, MSc, MPH , Stephanie Couperthwaite BSc , Esther H. Yang MEng , Steven Fisher MD , Brian H. Rowe MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Bleeding in early pregnancy is a common obstetric presentation in the emergency department (ED), and the outcome is difficult to predict. We developed and compared random forest machine learning (Live Birth Risk Score [<em>LiBRisk</em>]) and nomogram models for predicting the likelihood of a live birth among women presenting at 3 Canadian EDs with bleeding in early pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were prospectively collected on 200 patients with bleeding in early pregnancy using a structured questionnaire, medical record review, and administrative databases. We developed the nomogram with variables selected via multivariable logistic regression analysis. <em>LiBRisk</em> was built using the Shapley variable importance cloud (ShapleyVIC) to derive a simple point-based clinical risk scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 115 (55%) patients experienced a miscarriage. We excluded duration of vaginal bleeding and pain score, which did not enhance model performance, and constructed <em>LiBRisk</em> with the 8 most important variables (β-human chorionic gonadotrophin level, age, gestational age, gravidity, parity, proportionality of uterine size to gestational age, abdominal cramping, and number of prior spontaneous abortions). All 10 variables were included in the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of <em>LiBRisk</em> in the test and validation sets were 0.913 (95% CI 0.907−0.919) and 0.900 (95% CI 0.887−0.913), respectively. The <em>C</em>-index of the nomogram was 0.720 (95% CI 0.714−0.726) and 0.860 (95% CI 0.853−0.867) in the test and validation sets, respectively. <em>LiBRisk</em> outperformed the nomogram in all metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and compared <em>LiBRisk</em> and nomogram models for determining the probability of eventual pregnancy success/failure in women presenting to the ED with bleeding in early pregnancy. <em>LiBRisk</em> was more parsimonious, incorporating only 8 variables, and outperformed the nomogram in all metrics. Given these promising results, further testing seems warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":"47 4","pages":"Article 102789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Bleeding in Early Pregnancy: Comparing Different Models to Predict Pregnancy Success\",\"authors\":\"Nana Owusu M. Essel MD, MSc, MPH , Stephanie Couperthwaite BSc , Esther H. Yang MEng , Steven Fisher MD , Brian H. Rowe MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Bleeding in early pregnancy is a common obstetric presentation in the emergency department (ED), and the outcome is difficult to predict. We developed and compared random forest machine learning (Live Birth Risk Score [<em>LiBRisk</em>]) and nomogram models for predicting the likelihood of a live birth among women presenting at 3 Canadian EDs with bleeding in early pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were prospectively collected on 200 patients with bleeding in early pregnancy using a structured questionnaire, medical record review, and administrative databases. We developed the nomogram with variables selected via multivariable logistic regression analysis. <em>LiBRisk</em> was built using the Shapley variable importance cloud (ShapleyVIC) to derive a simple point-based clinical risk scoring system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 115 (55%) patients experienced a miscarriage. We excluded duration of vaginal bleeding and pain score, which did not enhance model performance, and constructed <em>LiBRisk</em> with the 8 most important variables (β-human chorionic gonadotrophin level, age, gestational age, gravidity, parity, proportionality of uterine size to gestational age, abdominal cramping, and number of prior spontaneous abortions). All 10 variables were included in the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of <em>LiBRisk</em> in the test and validation sets were 0.913 (95% CI 0.907−0.919) and 0.900 (95% CI 0.887−0.913), respectively. The <em>C</em>-index of the nomogram was 0.720 (95% CI 0.714−0.726) and 0.860 (95% CI 0.853−0.867) in the test and validation sets, respectively. <em>LiBRisk</em> outperformed the nomogram in all metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We developed and compared <em>LiBRisk</em> and nomogram models for determining the probability of eventual pregnancy success/failure in women presenting to the ED with bleeding in early pregnancy. <em>LiBRisk</em> was more parsimonious, incorporating only 8 variables, and outperformed the nomogram in all metrics. Given these promising results, further testing seems warranted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 102789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216325000295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216325000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Bleeding in Early Pregnancy: Comparing Different Models to Predict Pregnancy Success
Objectives
Bleeding in early pregnancy is a common obstetric presentation in the emergency department (ED), and the outcome is difficult to predict. We developed and compared random forest machine learning (Live Birth Risk Score [LiBRisk]) and nomogram models for predicting the likelihood of a live birth among women presenting at 3 Canadian EDs with bleeding in early pregnancy.
Methods
Data were prospectively collected on 200 patients with bleeding in early pregnancy using a structured questionnaire, medical record review, and administrative databases. We developed the nomogram with variables selected via multivariable logistic regression analysis. LiBRisk was built using the Shapley variable importance cloud (ShapleyVIC) to derive a simple point-based clinical risk scoring system.
Results
Overall, 115 (55%) patients experienced a miscarriage. We excluded duration of vaginal bleeding and pain score, which did not enhance model performance, and constructed LiBRisk with the 8 most important variables (β-human chorionic gonadotrophin level, age, gestational age, gravidity, parity, proportionality of uterine size to gestational age, abdominal cramping, and number of prior spontaneous abortions). All 10 variables were included in the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of LiBRisk in the test and validation sets were 0.913 (95% CI 0.907−0.919) and 0.900 (95% CI 0.887−0.913), respectively. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.720 (95% CI 0.714−0.726) and 0.860 (95% CI 0.853−0.867) in the test and validation sets, respectively. LiBRisk outperformed the nomogram in all metrics.
Conclusions
We developed and compared LiBRisk and nomogram models for determining the probability of eventual pregnancy success/failure in women presenting to the ED with bleeding in early pregnancy. LiBRisk was more parsimonious, incorporating only 8 variables, and outperformed the nomogram in all metrics. Given these promising results, further testing seems warranted.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.