肩腋胸骨上缺口指数(AASI)与眼视距离比测验(HMDR)预测喉难显像的比较。

Q3 Medicine
Tanaffos Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Mahdis Hamedi, Mohammad Reza Kamranmanesh, Parisa Sezari, Kamran Mottaghi
{"title":"肩腋胸骨上缺口指数(AASI)与眼视距离比测验(HMDR)预测喉难显像的比较。","authors":"Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Mahdis Hamedi, Mohammad Reza Kamranmanesh, Parisa Sezari, Kamran Mottaghi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safe airway management during anesthesia induction is a challenging issue. Airway-related morbidity can be prevented by carefully evaluating patients and formulating a difficult airway management strategy. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare two indices, AASI, and HMDR, in predicting difficult laryngoscopic visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six hundred and twenty-two patients, who entered the operating room for any type of elective surgery and were candidates for general anesthesia, underwent AASI and HMDR measurements after filling out a questionnaire containing personal information, oral examinations, and history of illness or surgery before anesthesia prescription. The Cormack grade was recorded during laryngoscopy, and finally, the predictive value of the two methods was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on analysis, AASI has a higher specificity than HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%) and the positive predictive value of AASI is 97%. Therefore, both HMDR and AASI are valid and significant indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AASI has a better diagnostic profile than HMDR regarding sensitivity and positive predictive value, Additionally, AASI is more convenient to use because it is simpler and visually predictable, making it a reliable clinical predictor.</p>","PeriodicalId":22247,"journal":{"name":"Tanaffos","volume":"23 2","pages":"163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Acromio-Axillo-Suprasternal Notch Index (AASI) with Hyomental Distance Ratio Test (HMDR) in Predicting Difficult Visualization of the Larynx.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Mahdis Hamedi, Mohammad Reza Kamranmanesh, Parisa Sezari, Kamran Mottaghi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safe airway management during anesthesia induction is a challenging issue. Airway-related morbidity can be prevented by carefully evaluating patients and formulating a difficult airway management strategy. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare two indices, AASI, and HMDR, in predicting difficult laryngoscopic visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six hundred and twenty-two patients, who entered the operating room for any type of elective surgery and were candidates for general anesthesia, underwent AASI and HMDR measurements after filling out a questionnaire containing personal information, oral examinations, and history of illness or surgery before anesthesia prescription. The Cormack grade was recorded during laryngoscopy, and finally, the predictive value of the two methods was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on analysis, AASI has a higher specificity than HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%) and the positive predictive value of AASI is 97%. Therefore, both HMDR and AASI are valid and significant indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AASI has a better diagnostic profile than HMDR regarding sensitivity and positive predictive value, Additionally, AASI is more convenient to use because it is simpler and visually predictable, making it a reliable clinical predictor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanaffos\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"163-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanaffos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanaffos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:麻醉诱导过程中气道的安全管理是一个具有挑战性的问题。气道相关的发病率可以通过仔细评估患者和制定困难的气道管理策略来预防。本研究的目的是调查和比较AASI和HMDR两种指标在预测喉镜下难以显示的情况。材料与方法:622例进入手术室进行任何类型择期手术的全麻候选者,在填写了包含个人信息、口腔检查、麻醉处方前疾病史或手术史的问卷后,进行了AASI和HMDR测量。在喉镜检查时记录Cormack分级,最后比较两种方法的预测价值。结果:经分析,AASI特异性高于HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%),阳性预测值为97%。因此,HMDR和AASI都是预测喉镜检查困难的有效和重要指标。结论:AASI在诊断敏感性和阳性预测值方面均优于HMDR,且使用简便、直观可预测,是一种可靠的临床预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Acromio-Axillo-Suprasternal Notch Index (AASI) with Hyomental Distance Ratio Test (HMDR) in Predicting Difficult Visualization of the Larynx.

Background: Safe airway management during anesthesia induction is a challenging issue. Airway-related morbidity can be prevented by carefully evaluating patients and formulating a difficult airway management strategy. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare two indices, AASI, and HMDR, in predicting difficult laryngoscopic visualization.

Materials and methods: Six hundred and twenty-two patients, who entered the operating room for any type of elective surgery and were candidates for general anesthesia, underwent AASI and HMDR measurements after filling out a questionnaire containing personal information, oral examinations, and history of illness or surgery before anesthesia prescription. The Cormack grade was recorded during laryngoscopy, and finally, the predictive value of the two methods was compared.

Results: Based on analysis, AASI has a higher specificity than HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%) and the positive predictive value of AASI is 97%. Therefore, both HMDR and AASI are valid and significant indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.

Conclusion: AASI has a better diagnostic profile than HMDR regarding sensitivity and positive predictive value, Additionally, AASI is more convenient to use because it is simpler and visually predictable, making it a reliable clinical predictor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tanaffos
Tanaffos Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信