{"title":"肩腋胸骨上缺口指数(AASI)与眼视距离比测验(HMDR)预测喉难显像的比较。","authors":"Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Mahdis Hamedi, Mohammad Reza Kamranmanesh, Parisa Sezari, Kamran Mottaghi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safe airway management during anesthesia induction is a challenging issue. Airway-related morbidity can be prevented by carefully evaluating patients and formulating a difficult airway management strategy. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare two indices, AASI, and HMDR, in predicting difficult laryngoscopic visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six hundred and twenty-two patients, who entered the operating room for any type of elective surgery and were candidates for general anesthesia, underwent AASI and HMDR measurements after filling out a questionnaire containing personal information, oral examinations, and history of illness or surgery before anesthesia prescription. The Cormack grade was recorded during laryngoscopy, and finally, the predictive value of the two methods was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on analysis, AASI has a higher specificity than HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%) and the positive predictive value of AASI is 97%. Therefore, both HMDR and AASI are valid and significant indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AASI has a better diagnostic profile than HMDR regarding sensitivity and positive predictive value, Additionally, AASI is more convenient to use because it is simpler and visually predictable, making it a reliable clinical predictor.</p>","PeriodicalId":22247,"journal":{"name":"Tanaffos","volume":"23 2","pages":"163-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Acromio-Axillo-Suprasternal Notch Index (AASI) with Hyomental Distance Ratio Test (HMDR) in Predicting Difficult Visualization of the Larynx.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Jaffari, Homayoun Aghamohammadi, Mahdis Hamedi, Mohammad Reza Kamranmanesh, Parisa Sezari, Kamran Mottaghi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safe airway management during anesthesia induction is a challenging issue. Airway-related morbidity can be prevented by carefully evaluating patients and formulating a difficult airway management strategy. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare two indices, AASI, and HMDR, in predicting difficult laryngoscopic visualization.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six hundred and twenty-two patients, who entered the operating room for any type of elective surgery and were candidates for general anesthesia, underwent AASI and HMDR measurements after filling out a questionnaire containing personal information, oral examinations, and history of illness or surgery before anesthesia prescription. The Cormack grade was recorded during laryngoscopy, and finally, the predictive value of the two methods was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on analysis, AASI has a higher specificity than HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%) and the positive predictive value of AASI is 97%. Therefore, both HMDR and AASI are valid and significant indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AASI has a better diagnostic profile than HMDR regarding sensitivity and positive predictive value, Additionally, AASI is more convenient to use because it is simpler and visually predictable, making it a reliable clinical predictor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanaffos\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"163-169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11825070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanaffos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanaffos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:麻醉诱导过程中气道的安全管理是一个具有挑战性的问题。气道相关的发病率可以通过仔细评估患者和制定困难的气道管理策略来预防。本研究的目的是调查和比较AASI和HMDR两种指标在预测喉镜下难以显示的情况。材料与方法:622例进入手术室进行任何类型择期手术的全麻候选者,在填写了包含个人信息、口腔检查、麻醉处方前疾病史或手术史的问卷后,进行了AASI和HMDR测量。在喉镜检查时记录Cormack分级,最后比较两种方法的预测价值。结果:经分析,AASI特异性高于HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%),阳性预测值为97%。因此,HMDR和AASI都是预测喉镜检查困难的有效和重要指标。结论:AASI在诊断敏感性和阳性预测值方面均优于HMDR,且使用简便、直观可预测,是一种可靠的临床预测指标。
Comparison of Acromio-Axillo-Suprasternal Notch Index (AASI) with Hyomental Distance Ratio Test (HMDR) in Predicting Difficult Visualization of the Larynx.
Background: Safe airway management during anesthesia induction is a challenging issue. Airway-related morbidity can be prevented by carefully evaluating patients and formulating a difficult airway management strategy. The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare two indices, AASI, and HMDR, in predicting difficult laryngoscopic visualization.
Materials and methods: Six hundred and twenty-two patients, who entered the operating room for any type of elective surgery and were candidates for general anesthesia, underwent AASI and HMDR measurements after filling out a questionnaire containing personal information, oral examinations, and history of illness or surgery before anesthesia prescription. The Cormack grade was recorded during laryngoscopy, and finally, the predictive value of the two methods was compared.
Results: Based on analysis, AASI has a higher specificity than HDMR (87.5% vs. 76.1%) and the positive predictive value of AASI is 97%. Therefore, both HMDR and AASI are valid and significant indicators for predicting difficult laryngoscopy.
Conclusion: AASI has a better diagnostic profile than HMDR regarding sensitivity and positive predictive value, Additionally, AASI is more convenient to use because it is simpler and visually predictable, making it a reliable clinical predictor.