鉴别可能受益于三线化疗的晚期胰腺癌患者。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bomi Kim, Jaihwan Kim, Soomin Yang, Jinwoo Ahn, Kwangrok Jung, Jong-Chan Lee, Jin-Hyeok Hwang
{"title":"鉴别可能受益于三线化疗的晚期胰腺癌患者。","authors":"Bomi Kim, Jaihwan Kim, Soomin Yang, Jinwoo Ahn, Kwangrok Jung, Jong-Chan Lee, Jin-Hyeok Hwang","doi":"10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.100167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival rates of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) have been improved with palliative chemotherapy series. The current preferred first-line regimen consists of combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GNP). After failure of first-line chemotherapy, there are a few options for subsequent therapy including switch to the unused first-line regimen or nano-liposomal irinotecan and 5-FU/LV. However, there are limited studies on the efficacy of third-line chemotherapy after failure of second-line chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify patients with APC who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records from a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed between 2012 and 2021. The study included patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally APC who underwent first-line FOLFIRINOX or GNP and subsequently received third-line chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis and OS after third-line chemotherapy (OS3) were defined as the interval from the diagnosis to all-cause death and the time between the initiation of the third-line chemotherapy to all-cause death, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 patients were enrolled. The median patient age at diagnosis was 61.8 years (36.0-86.0), and 54.9% were male. The first-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (67.4%) or GNP (32.6%). The second-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (27.0%), GNP (52.5%), or other (20.6%). The median OS was 19.0 months, and the median OS3 and progression-free survival after third-line treatment were 15.3 and 7.3 weeks, respectively. With regard to the best tumor response during third-line chemotherapy, 1.4% had partial response, 24.8% had stable disease, and 59.6% had progressive disease. The following clinical factors before third-line chemotherapy affected OS3: Good performance status (PS), serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level < 1000 U/mL, duration of second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified that patients with good PS, CA19-9 < 1000 U/mL, second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding before starting third-line treatment may benefit more from third-line chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23762,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"100167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Bomi Kim, Jaihwan Kim, Soomin Yang, Jinwoo Ahn, Kwangrok Jung, Jong-Chan Lee, Jin-Hyeok Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.100167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival rates of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) have been improved with palliative chemotherapy series. The current preferred first-line regimen consists of combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GNP). After failure of first-line chemotherapy, there are a few options for subsequent therapy including switch to the unused first-line regimen or nano-liposomal irinotecan and 5-FU/LV. However, there are limited studies on the efficacy of third-line chemotherapy after failure of second-line chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify patients with APC who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records from a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed between 2012 and 2021. The study included patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally APC who underwent first-line FOLFIRINOX or GNP and subsequently received third-line chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis and OS after third-line chemotherapy (OS3) were defined as the interval from the diagnosis to all-cause death and the time between the initiation of the third-line chemotherapy to all-cause death, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 patients were enrolled. The median patient age at diagnosis was 61.8 years (36.0-86.0), and 54.9% were male. The first-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (67.4%) or GNP (32.6%). The second-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (27.0%), GNP (52.5%), or other (20.6%). The median OS was 19.0 months, and the median OS3 and progression-free survival after third-line treatment were 15.3 and 7.3 weeks, respectively. With regard to the best tumor response during third-line chemotherapy, 1.4% had partial response, 24.8% had stable disease, and 59.6% had progressive disease. The following clinical factors before third-line chemotherapy affected OS3: Good performance status (PS), serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level < 1000 U/mL, duration of second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified that patients with good PS, CA19-9 < 1000 U/mL, second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding before starting third-line treatment may benefit more from third-line chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"100167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.100167\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i2.100167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息性化疗系列可提高晚期胰腺癌(APC)患者的生存率。目前首选的一线方案包括5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)/亚叶酸钙(LV)、伊立替康和奥沙利铂(FOLFIRINOX)联合治疗或吉西他滨加白蛋白结合紫杉醇(GNP)。在一线化疗失败后,后续治疗有几种选择,包括切换到未使用的一线方案或纳米脂质体伊立替康和5-FU/LV。然而,二线化疗失败后三线化疗的疗效研究有限。目的:鉴别可能受益于三线化疗的APC患者。方法:回顾性分析某三级医院2012 - 2021年的病历。该研究包括组织学或细胞学证实的转移性或局部APC患者,他们接受了一线FOLFIRINOX或GNP,随后接受了三线化疗。诊断后总生存期(OS)和三线化疗后总生存期(OS3)分别为诊断至全因死亡的时间间隔和开始三线化疗至全因死亡的时间间隔。结果:共纳入141例患者。患者诊断时的中位年龄为61.8岁(36.0-86.0岁),男性占54.9%。一线方案为FOLFIRINOX(67.4%)或GNP(32.6%)。二线方案为FOLFIRINOX(27.0%)、GNP(52.5%)或other(20.6%)。中位OS为19.0个月,三线治疗后的中位OS3和无进展生存期分别为15.3周和7.3周。在三线化疗期间肿瘤反应最佳的患者中,1.4%的患者部分缓解,24.8%的患者病情稳定,59.6%的患者病情进展。三线化疗前影响OS3的临床因素有:表现状态良好(PS)、血清碳水化合物抗原19-9 (CA19-9)水平< 1000 U/mL、二线化疗持续时间≥19周、未进行腹膜播种。结论:本研究发现,PS良好、CA19-9 < 1000 U/mL、二线化疗≥19周、开始三线治疗前无腹膜播种的患者可能从三线化疗中获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.

Background: Survival rates of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) have been improved with palliative chemotherapy series. The current preferred first-line regimen consists of combination therapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GNP). After failure of first-line chemotherapy, there are a few options for subsequent therapy including switch to the unused first-line regimen or nano-liposomal irinotecan and 5-FU/LV. However, there are limited studies on the efficacy of third-line chemotherapy after failure of second-line chemotherapy.

Aim: To identify patients with APC who might benefit from third-line chemotherapy.

Methods: Medical records from a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed between 2012 and 2021. The study included patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally APC who underwent first-line FOLFIRINOX or GNP and subsequently received third-line chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) after diagnosis and OS after third-line chemotherapy (OS3) were defined as the interval from the diagnosis to all-cause death and the time between the initiation of the third-line chemotherapy to all-cause death, respectively.

Results: A total of 141 patients were enrolled. The median patient age at diagnosis was 61.8 years (36.0-86.0), and 54.9% were male. The first-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (67.4%) or GNP (32.6%). The second-line regimen was FOLFIRINOX (27.0%), GNP (52.5%), or other (20.6%). The median OS was 19.0 months, and the median OS3 and progression-free survival after third-line treatment were 15.3 and 7.3 weeks, respectively. With regard to the best tumor response during third-line chemotherapy, 1.4% had partial response, 24.8% had stable disease, and 59.6% had progressive disease. The following clinical factors before third-line chemotherapy affected OS3: Good performance status (PS), serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level < 1000 U/mL, duration of second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding.

Conclusion: This study identified that patients with good PS, CA19-9 < 1000 U/mL, second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding before starting third-line treatment may benefit more from third-line chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
1082
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (WJGO) is a leading academic journal devoted to reporting the latest, cutting-edge research progress and findings of basic research and clinical practice in the field of gastrointestinal oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信