艾滋病、糖尿病和营养补充研究中的依从性定义、测量方式和心理测量特性:范围综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-02-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S498537
Julia Burleson, Daryl E Stephens, Rajiv N Rimal
{"title":"艾滋病、糖尿病和营养补充研究中的依从性定义、测量方式和心理测量特性:范围综述。","authors":"Julia Burleson, Daryl E Stephens, Rajiv N Rimal","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S498537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring adherence has been a priority for researchers to help inform effective care for patients regularly consuming medications for chronic conditions. As a widely accepted \"gold standard\" adherence measure or operational definition does not exist, studies measure adherence using different modalities, which may lead to different conclusions about adherence patterns. The purpose of the scoping review was to identify modalities used to measure adherence to HIV medication, diabetes medication, and nutritional supplementation and explore the variation in adherence definitions, measurement modalities, and psychometric properties being reported across studies. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO from January 2012 to January 2022. We included studies reporting psychometric properties of adherence/compliance to HIV medication, diabetes medication, or nutritional supplements. In total, we included 88 studies in the review. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was the most frequently used self-reported measure. We found almost no relationship between country income level and triangulation levels. The operational definition of adherence fell into four categories: numerical, dichotomous, ranked ordinal, and undefined. The amount of variation in an adherence definition category within a modality depended on whether the measures within the modality could be assessed numerically and whether widely accepted cutoffs existed for the measure. Across studies, 46 (52%) reported both validity and reliability, 28 (31%) reported validity only, and 14 (16%) reported reliability only. Fourteen types of validity and six types of reliability were identified across the studies. Measuring adherence accurately and reliably continues to be a challenge for research in HIV, diabetes, and nutritional supplementations. When reporting adherence measurements, we suggest including adherence results from multiple measures and modalities, presenting adherence results numerically, and reporting multiple types of validity and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"319-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence Definitions, Measurement Modalities, and Psychometric Properties in HIV, Diabetes, and Nutritional Supplementation Studies: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Burleson, Daryl E Stephens, Rajiv N Rimal\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/PPA.S498537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measuring adherence has been a priority for researchers to help inform effective care for patients regularly consuming medications for chronic conditions. As a widely accepted \\\"gold standard\\\" adherence measure or operational definition does not exist, studies measure adherence using different modalities, which may lead to different conclusions about adherence patterns. The purpose of the scoping review was to identify modalities used to measure adherence to HIV medication, diabetes medication, and nutritional supplementation and explore the variation in adherence definitions, measurement modalities, and psychometric properties being reported across studies. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO from January 2012 to January 2022. We included studies reporting psychometric properties of adherence/compliance to HIV medication, diabetes medication, or nutritional supplements. In total, we included 88 studies in the review. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was the most frequently used self-reported measure. We found almost no relationship between country income level and triangulation levels. The operational definition of adherence fell into four categories: numerical, dichotomous, ranked ordinal, and undefined. The amount of variation in an adherence definition category within a modality depended on whether the measures within the modality could be assessed numerically and whether widely accepted cutoffs existed for the measure. Across studies, 46 (52%) reported both validity and reliability, 28 (31%) reported validity only, and 14 (16%) reported reliability only. Fourteen types of validity and six types of reliability were identified across the studies. Measuring adherence accurately and reliably continues to be a challenge for research in HIV, diabetes, and nutritional supplementations. When reporting adherence measurements, we suggest including adherence results from multiple measures and modalities, presenting adherence results numerically, and reporting multiple types of validity and reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"319-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient preference and adherence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S498537\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S498537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量依从性一直是研究人员的首要任务,以帮助为经常服用慢性疾病药物的患者提供有效的护理。由于没有一个被广泛接受的“金标准”依从性测量或可操作的定义,研究使用不同的方法来测量依从性,这可能导致对依从性模式的不同结论。本综述的目的是确定用于测量艾滋病药物治疗、糖尿病药物治疗和营养补充依从性的方法,并探讨各研究中报告的依从性定义、测量方法和心理测量特性的差异。从2012年1月到2022年1月,在PubMed、Scopus和PsycINFO中进行了综合检索。我们纳入了报告HIV药物治疗、糖尿病药物治疗或营养补充剂依从性的心理测量特性的研究。我们总共纳入了88项研究。莫里斯基药物依从性量表(MMAS-8)是最常用的自我报告量表。我们发现国家收入水平和三角测量水平之间几乎没有关系。依从性的操作定义分为四类:数字、二分类、排序顺序和未定义。一种模态内依从性定义类别的变化量取决于该模态内的措施是否可以进行数值评估,以及该措施是否存在被广泛接受的截止值。在所有研究中,46项(52%)报告了效度和信度,28项(31%)报告了效度,14项(16%)报告了信度。在整个研究中确定了14种效度和6种信度。准确可靠地测量依从性仍然是艾滋病毒、糖尿病和营养补充剂研究的一个挑战。在报告依从性测量时,我们建议包括来自多种测量和模式的依从性结果,以数字形式呈现依从性结果,并报告多种类型的有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence Definitions, Measurement Modalities, and Psychometric Properties in HIV, Diabetes, and Nutritional Supplementation Studies: A Scoping Review.

Measuring adherence has been a priority for researchers to help inform effective care for patients regularly consuming medications for chronic conditions. As a widely accepted "gold standard" adherence measure or operational definition does not exist, studies measure adherence using different modalities, which may lead to different conclusions about adherence patterns. The purpose of the scoping review was to identify modalities used to measure adherence to HIV medication, diabetes medication, and nutritional supplementation and explore the variation in adherence definitions, measurement modalities, and psychometric properties being reported across studies. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO from January 2012 to January 2022. We included studies reporting psychometric properties of adherence/compliance to HIV medication, diabetes medication, or nutritional supplements. In total, we included 88 studies in the review. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was the most frequently used self-reported measure. We found almost no relationship between country income level and triangulation levels. The operational definition of adherence fell into four categories: numerical, dichotomous, ranked ordinal, and undefined. The amount of variation in an adherence definition category within a modality depended on whether the measures within the modality could be assessed numerically and whether widely accepted cutoffs existed for the measure. Across studies, 46 (52%) reported both validity and reliability, 28 (31%) reported validity only, and 14 (16%) reported reliability only. Fourteen types of validity and six types of reliability were identified across the studies. Measuring adherence accurately and reliably continues to be a challenge for research in HIV, diabetes, and nutritional supplementations. When reporting adherence measurements, we suggest including adherence results from multiple measures and modalities, presenting adherence results numerically, and reporting multiple types of validity and reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信