baricitinib与sarilumab对RA患者疾病活动性的有效性:一项倾向评分匹配研究

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkaf006
Toshitaka Yukishima, Yukio Nakamura, Shin-Ichiro Ohmura, Tomonori Kobayakawa
{"title":"baricitinib与sarilumab对RA患者疾病活动性的有效性:一项倾向评分匹配研究","authors":"Toshitaka Yukishima, Yukio Nakamura, Shin-Ichiro Ohmura, Tomonori Kobayakawa","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, versus sarilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor, on the disease activity of patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our hospital and cooperative facilities, we initiated treatment with baricitinib and sarilumab and observed patients with RA longitudinally for 52 weeks. Propensity score matching (age, sex, disease duration, MTX/glucocorticoid usage, RF/ACPA positivity and Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP level) was performed to address potential treatment selection bias, resulting in 46 patients in each group. The following data were collected: Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, Boolean 2.0 and their component indices at weeks 24 and 52. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with baricitinib, sarilumab induced a similar improvement in disease activity; however, baricitinib induced a significantly greater improvement in the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks than sarilumab. At the component level, baricitinib significantly improved the number of swollen joints at 24 weeks, improving the Clinical Disease Activity Index; however, after 52 weeks, the difference between the two groups was no longer statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with sarilumab, baricitinib improved swollen joints and the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks; however, by 52 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, indicating that both treatments are important for long-term use.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"9 1","pages":"rkaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of baricitinib versus sarilumab on disease activity in patients with RA: a propensity score matching study.\",\"authors\":\"Toshitaka Yukishima, Yukio Nakamura, Shin-Ichiro Ohmura, Tomonori Kobayakawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rap/rkaf006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, versus sarilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor, on the disease activity of patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our hospital and cooperative facilities, we initiated treatment with baricitinib and sarilumab and observed patients with RA longitudinally for 52 weeks. Propensity score matching (age, sex, disease duration, MTX/glucocorticoid usage, RF/ACPA positivity and Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP level) was performed to address potential treatment selection bias, resulting in 46 patients in each group. The following data were collected: Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, Boolean 2.0 and their component indices at weeks 24 and 52. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with baricitinib, sarilumab induced a similar improvement in disease activity; however, baricitinib induced a significantly greater improvement in the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks than sarilumab. At the component level, baricitinib significantly improved the number of swollen joints at 24 weeks, improving the Clinical Disease Activity Index; however, after 52 weeks, the difference between the two groups was no longer statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with sarilumab, baricitinib improved swollen joints and the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks; however, by 52 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, indicating that both treatments are important for long-term use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"rkaf006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology Advances in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估baricitinib(一种Janus激酶抑制剂)与sarilumab(一种针对IL-6受体的人单克隆抗体)对RA患者疾病活动性的影响。方法:在我院及合作机构,我们开始使用巴西替尼和沙伐单抗治疗,并对RA患者进行52周的纵向观察。倾向评分匹配(年龄、性别、病程、MTX/糖皮质激素使用、RF/ACPA阳性和疾病活动评分28与CRP水平)以解决潜在的治疗选择偏倚,每组46例患者。收集以下数据:第24周和第52周的CRP疾病活动评分28分、临床疾病活动指数、简化疾病活动指数、布尔2.0及其组成指数。对两组患者进行对比分析。结果:与baricitinib相比,sarilumab对疾病活动性的改善相似;然而,baricitinib在24周时诱导的临床疾病活动指数的改善明显大于sarilumab。在成分水平上,baricitinib显著改善了24周时肿胀关节的数量,改善了临床疾病活动指数(Clinical Disease Activity Index);然而,52周后,两组之间的差异不再具有统计学意义。结论:与沙利单抗相比,baricitinib改善了肿胀的关节和24周的临床疾病活动指数;然而,到52周时,两组之间没有观察到显著差异,表明两种治疗方法对于长期使用都很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of baricitinib versus sarilumab on disease activity in patients with RA: a propensity score matching study.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, versus sarilumab, a human monoclonal antibody against the IL-6 receptor, on the disease activity of patients with RA.

Methods: At our hospital and cooperative facilities, we initiated treatment with baricitinib and sarilumab and observed patients with RA longitudinally for 52 weeks. Propensity score matching (age, sex, disease duration, MTX/glucocorticoid usage, RF/ACPA positivity and Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP level) was performed to address potential treatment selection bias, resulting in 46 patients in each group. The following data were collected: Disease Activity Score 28 with CRP, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, Boolean 2.0 and their component indices at weeks 24 and 52. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups.

Results: Compared with baricitinib, sarilumab induced a similar improvement in disease activity; however, baricitinib induced a significantly greater improvement in the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks than sarilumab. At the component level, baricitinib significantly improved the number of swollen joints at 24 weeks, improving the Clinical Disease Activity Index; however, after 52 weeks, the difference between the two groups was no longer statistically significant.

Conclusion: Compared with sarilumab, baricitinib improved swollen joints and the Clinical Disease Activity Index at 24 weeks; however, by 52 weeks, no significant difference was observed between the two groups, indicating that both treatments are important for long-term use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信