Carlo Alberto Artusi, Claudia Ledda, Silvia Gallo, Domiziana Rinaldi, Corrado Campisi, Vanessa Rousseau, Claire Thalamas, Raquel Barbosa, Fabienne Ory-Magne, Christine Brefel-Courbon, Olivier Rascol, Amaury de Barros, Estelle Harroch, Maurizio Zibetti, Mario Giorgio Rizzone, Alberto Romagnolo, Gabriele Imbalzano, Leonardo Lopiano, Jean Luc Houeto, Margherita Fabbri
{"title":"丘脑下和神经刺激对帕金森病的步态冻结:随机试点试验。","authors":"Carlo Alberto Artusi, Claudia Ledda, Silvia Gallo, Domiziana Rinaldi, Corrado Campisi, Vanessa Rousseau, Claire Thalamas, Raquel Barbosa, Fabienne Ory-Magne, Christine Brefel-Courbon, Olivier Rascol, Amaury de Barros, Estelle Harroch, Maurizio Zibetti, Mario Giorgio Rizzone, Alberto Romagnolo, Gabriele Imbalzano, Leonardo Lopiano, Jean Luc Houeto, Margherita Fabbri","doi":"10.1177/1877718X241292315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Freezing of gait (FoG) is a debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) with limited response to dopaminergic medication and subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) stimulation could improve FoG.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of combined STN-SNr stimulation at different frequencies on FoG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a double-blind, cross-over, randomized pilot trial involving STN-DBS treated PD patients with FoG. Participants received: high-frequency (HF) STN-DBS (S), combined HF-STN and SNr stimulation (C1), and combined HF-STN and low-frequency (LF) SNr stimulation (C2), for one month each. The primary endpoint was the score change in the New-Freezing-of-Gait-Questionnaire (NFOG-Q). Secondary analyses were performed on motor complications, axial symptoms, daily living activities, psychiatric symptoms, sleep, and patient preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients received at least one combined stimulation. No significant difference in NFOG-Q scores was found between S, C1, and C2; one-third of patients showed a clinically significant improvement (≥8 points) with combined stimulations. Motor complications improved significantly with C1 and C2 (C1-S: 3.6 ± 3.8 vs. 4.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.046; C2-S: 2.7 ± 3.1 vs. 4.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.005). 80% of patients preferred the combined STN-SNr stimulation while blinded. All adverse events were manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study did not prove a statistically significant improvement in NFOG-Q with STN-SNr stimulation; however, one-third of patients experienced a clinically meaningful FoG improvement, and the majority preferred to maintain STN-SNr stimulation. STN-SNr stimulation was both safe and effective in addressing motor complications and improving sleep quality, highlighting the importance of further exploration into the effects of combined STN-SNr stimulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","volume":"14 8","pages":"1602-1613"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subthalamic and nigral stimulation for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: Randomized pilot trial.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Alberto Artusi, Claudia Ledda, Silvia Gallo, Domiziana Rinaldi, Corrado Campisi, Vanessa Rousseau, Claire Thalamas, Raquel Barbosa, Fabienne Ory-Magne, Christine Brefel-Courbon, Olivier Rascol, Amaury de Barros, Estelle Harroch, Maurizio Zibetti, Mario Giorgio Rizzone, Alberto Romagnolo, Gabriele Imbalzano, Leonardo Lopiano, Jean Luc Houeto, Margherita Fabbri\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1877718X241292315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Freezing of gait (FoG) is a debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) with limited response to dopaminergic medication and subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) stimulation could improve FoG.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of combined STN-SNr stimulation at different frequencies on FoG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a double-blind, cross-over, randomized pilot trial involving STN-DBS treated PD patients with FoG. Participants received: high-frequency (HF) STN-DBS (S), combined HF-STN and SNr stimulation (C1), and combined HF-STN and low-frequency (LF) SNr stimulation (C2), for one month each. The primary endpoint was the score change in the New-Freezing-of-Gait-Questionnaire (NFOG-Q). Secondary analyses were performed on motor complications, axial symptoms, daily living activities, psychiatric symptoms, sleep, and patient preference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients received at least one combined stimulation. No significant difference in NFOG-Q scores was found between S, C1, and C2; one-third of patients showed a clinically significant improvement (≥8 points) with combined stimulations. Motor complications improved significantly with C1 and C2 (C1-S: 3.6 ± 3.8 vs. 4.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.046; C2-S: 2.7 ± 3.1 vs. 4.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.005). 80% of patients preferred the combined STN-SNr stimulation while blinded. All adverse events were manageable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study did not prove a statistically significant improvement in NFOG-Q with STN-SNr stimulation; however, one-third of patients experienced a clinically meaningful FoG improvement, and the majority preferred to maintain STN-SNr stimulation. STN-SNr stimulation was both safe and effective in addressing motor complications and improving sleep quality, highlighting the importance of further exploration into the effects of combined STN-SNr stimulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parkinson's disease\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"1602-1613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parkinson's disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1877718X241292315\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parkinson's disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1877718X241292315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:步态冻结(FoG)是帕金森病(PD)的一种衰弱症状,对多巴胺能药物和丘脑下深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)的反应有限。刺激黑质网状部(SNr)可改善FoG。目的:分析不同频率STN-SNr联合刺激对脑纤维化的影响。方法:我们进行了一项双盲、交叉、随机的试点试验,涉及STN-DBS治疗的PD患者。参与者接受:高频(HF) STN-DBS (S),高频- stn和信噪比联合刺激(C1),高频- stn和低频(LF)信噪比联合刺激(C2),各为期一个月。主要终点是新步态冻结问卷(NFOG-Q)的评分变化。对运动并发症、轴向症状、日常生活活动、精神症状、睡眠和患者偏好进行了二次分析。结果:15例患者接受了至少一次联合刺激。S组、C1组和C2组的nfogg - q评分无显著差异;三分之一的患者在联合刺激下表现出临床显著改善(≥8分)。C1和C2的运动并发症明显改善(C1- s: 3.6±3.8 vs 4.9±3.8,p = 0.046;C2-S: 2.7±3.1 vs. 4.9±3.8,p = 0.005)。80%的患者在盲法下更喜欢STN-SNr联合刺激。所有不良事件均在可控范围内。结论:我们的研究没有证明STN-SNr刺激能显著改善nfogg - q;然而,三分之一的患者经历了有临床意义的FoG改善,大多数患者倾向于维持STN-SNr刺激。STN-SNr刺激在解决运动并发症和改善睡眠质量方面既安全又有效,因此进一步探索STN-SNr联合刺激的效果具有重要意义。
Subthalamic and nigral stimulation for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: Randomized pilot trial.
Background: Freezing of gait (FoG) is a debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) with limited response to dopaminergic medication and subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) stimulation could improve FoG.
Objective: To analyze the effect of combined STN-SNr stimulation at different frequencies on FoG.
Methods: We performed a double-blind, cross-over, randomized pilot trial involving STN-DBS treated PD patients with FoG. Participants received: high-frequency (HF) STN-DBS (S), combined HF-STN and SNr stimulation (C1), and combined HF-STN and low-frequency (LF) SNr stimulation (C2), for one month each. The primary endpoint was the score change in the New-Freezing-of-Gait-Questionnaire (NFOG-Q). Secondary analyses were performed on motor complications, axial symptoms, daily living activities, psychiatric symptoms, sleep, and patient preference.
Results: Fifteen patients received at least one combined stimulation. No significant difference in NFOG-Q scores was found between S, C1, and C2; one-third of patients showed a clinically significant improvement (≥8 points) with combined stimulations. Motor complications improved significantly with C1 and C2 (C1-S: 3.6 ± 3.8 vs. 4.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.046; C2-S: 2.7 ± 3.1 vs. 4.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.005). 80% of patients preferred the combined STN-SNr stimulation while blinded. All adverse events were manageable.
Conclusions: Our study did not prove a statistically significant improvement in NFOG-Q with STN-SNr stimulation; however, one-third of patients experienced a clinically meaningful FoG improvement, and the majority preferred to maintain STN-SNr stimulation. STN-SNr stimulation was both safe and effective in addressing motor complications and improving sleep quality, highlighting the importance of further exploration into the effects of combined STN-SNr stimulation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Parkinson''s Disease (JPD) publishes original research in basic science, translational research and clinical medicine in Parkinson’s disease in cooperation with the Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease. It features a first class Editorial Board and provides rigorous peer review and rapid online publication.