dekode -基于云的绩效反馈模型改善了英国多家医院的DKA护理。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lakshmi N Rengarajan, Catherine Cooper, Kashish Malhotra, Angelica Sharma, Nevil Philip, Anu Ann Abraham, Ketan Dhatariya, Parth Narendran, Punith Kempegowda
{"title":"dekode -基于云的绩效反馈模型改善了英国多家医院的DKA护理。","authors":"Lakshmi N Rengarajan, Catherine Cooper, Kashish Malhotra, Angelica Sharma, Nevil Philip, Anu Ann Abraham, Ketan Dhatariya, Parth Narendran, Punith Kempegowda","doi":"10.1111/dme.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>A current gap in Diabetes-related ketoacidosis (DKA) research is understanding the factors contributing to variations in care and outcomes between people admitted with DKA. We aimed to create a system to facilitate gathering data on DKA management across multiple centres and identify trends in complications and outcomes associated with DKA.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and December 2022, we set up a cloud-based Quality improvement project (QIP) that provided regular feedback to 11 hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1977 episodes, we observed an increase in adherence in fluid prescription in hospitals C, D, E, F and G (C- 23% vs. 75% p = <0.001; D- 27% vs. 60%, p = <0.001; E- 17 vs. 79% p = <0.001; F- 16% vs. 57%, p = <0.001; G- 36% vs. 75% p = <0.001). Notable improvements in adherence to glucose monitoring were observed in hospitals B, D, and G (B- 11 vs. 38% p = <0.001; D- 36% vs. 56%, p = 0.05; G- 22% vs. 67% p = <0.001). Although we didn't observe significant changes in complications and outcomes among participating hospitals from the start to the end of the reported period, notable fluctuations were evident across quarters. These variations were relayed to the respective hospitals, underscoring how feedback and interventions could influence the care provided. This initiative also marks the initial move towards establishing and improving data collection practices in acute diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate a sustainable QIP that improves adherence to national guidelines in some indicators for DKA care and serves as an early warning system to identify adverse trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e70004"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DEKODE-A cloud-based performance feedback model improved DKA care across multiple hospitals in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Lakshmi N Rengarajan, Catherine Cooper, Kashish Malhotra, Angelica Sharma, Nevil Philip, Anu Ann Abraham, Ketan Dhatariya, Parth Narendran, Punith Kempegowda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>A current gap in Diabetes-related ketoacidosis (DKA) research is understanding the factors contributing to variations in care and outcomes between people admitted with DKA. We aimed to create a system to facilitate gathering data on DKA management across multiple centres and identify trends in complications and outcomes associated with DKA.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Between January 2020 and December 2022, we set up a cloud-based Quality improvement project (QIP) that provided regular feedback to 11 hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1977 episodes, we observed an increase in adherence in fluid prescription in hospitals C, D, E, F and G (C- 23% vs. 75% p = <0.001; D- 27% vs. 60%, p = <0.001; E- 17 vs. 79% p = <0.001; F- 16% vs. 57%, p = <0.001; G- 36% vs. 75% p = <0.001). Notable improvements in adherence to glucose monitoring were observed in hospitals B, D, and G (B- 11 vs. 38% p = <0.001; D- 36% vs. 56%, p = 0.05; G- 22% vs. 67% p = <0.001). Although we didn't observe significant changes in complications and outcomes among participating hospitals from the start to the end of the reported period, notable fluctuations were evident across quarters. These variations were relayed to the respective hospitals, underscoring how feedback and interventions could influence the care provided. This initiative also marks the initial move towards establishing and improving data collection practices in acute diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate a sustainable QIP that improves adherence to national guidelines in some indicators for DKA care and serves as an early warning system to identify adverse trends.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前糖尿病相关酮症酸中毒(DKA)研究的一个空白是了解导致DKA患者之间护理和结局差异的因素。我们的目标是创建一个系统,以方便收集跨多个中心的DKA管理数据,并确定与DKA相关的并发症和结果的趋势。研究设计与方法:在2020年1月至2022年12月期间,我们建立了一个基于云的质量改进项目(QIP),定期向英国(UK)的11家医院提供反馈。结果:在1977年的病例中,我们观察到C、D、E、F和G医院对液体处方的依从性增加(C- 23% vs. 75% p =结论:我们证明了一个可持续的QIP,它提高了DKA护理的一些指标对国家指南的依从性,并作为一个早期预警系统来识别不良趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DEKODE-A cloud-based performance feedback model improved DKA care across multiple hospitals in the UK.

Aim: A current gap in Diabetes-related ketoacidosis (DKA) research is understanding the factors contributing to variations in care and outcomes between people admitted with DKA. We aimed to create a system to facilitate gathering data on DKA management across multiple centres and identify trends in complications and outcomes associated with DKA.

Research design and methods: Between January 2020 and December 2022, we set up a cloud-based Quality improvement project (QIP) that provided regular feedback to 11 hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK).

Results: Of the 1977 episodes, we observed an increase in adherence in fluid prescription in hospitals C, D, E, F and G (C- 23% vs. 75% p = <0.001; D- 27% vs. 60%, p = <0.001; E- 17 vs. 79% p = <0.001; F- 16% vs. 57%, p = <0.001; G- 36% vs. 75% p = <0.001). Notable improvements in adherence to glucose monitoring were observed in hospitals B, D, and G (B- 11 vs. 38% p = <0.001; D- 36% vs. 56%, p = 0.05; G- 22% vs. 67% p = <0.001). Although we didn't observe significant changes in complications and outcomes among participating hospitals from the start to the end of the reported period, notable fluctuations were evident across quarters. These variations were relayed to the respective hospitals, underscoring how feedback and interventions could influence the care provided. This initiative also marks the initial move towards establishing and improving data collection practices in acute diabetes.

Conclusions: We demonstrate a sustainable QIP that improves adherence to national guidelines in some indicators for DKA care and serves as an early warning system to identify adverse trends.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信