意大利专门医院活动组织创新模式的绩效评估:“分散医院”。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Mattia Morri, Cristiana Forni, Anselmo Campagna, Annella Mingazzini, Viola Damen, Manuela De Clerico, Elisa Carretta, Guglielmo Celli, Matteo Buccioli, Marika Tomasello, Gerardina Protupapa, Erik Boetto
{"title":"意大利专门医院活动组织创新模式的绩效评估:“分散医院”。","authors":"Mattia Morri, Cristiana Forni, Anselmo Campagna, Annella Mingazzini, Viola Damen, Manuela De Clerico, Elisa Carretta, Guglielmo Celli, Matteo Buccioli, Marika Tomasello, Gerardina Protupapa, Erik Boetto","doi":"10.62713/aic.3565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of an innovative model of hospital activity known \"Diffuse Hospital\" (DH) that involved 3 hospital wards/departments (A, B and C) located throughout Italy and the Reference Hospital (RH) that organised the construction of this model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An organisational retrospective observational study was conducted on the orthopaedic ward of each hospital from March 2022 to March 2023. Hospitals A, B and C had organisational differences in relation to the working relationship of healthcare professionals, the care pathways implemented, the presence or absence of an emergency department and the management of operating theatres. The primary indicator was the number of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) provided by the individual facilities. Additionally, a series of indicators were collected, and to enable comparison, these indicators were calculated in relation to the available resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of DRGs provided by the DH was 3904, broken down into 1187 at Hospital A, 1851 at Hospital B and 866 at Hospital C. The RH comparison standard recorded 1603 DRGs. Hospital B showed higher DRG indicators of 39.7, 2.5 and 30.9 percentage points, respectively, than the RH. In relation to theatre activities and healthcare staff, Hospitals A and C revealed lower scores than the standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DH model may become a useful tool in healthcare policy strategies to enable national RHs to deliver treatments with high standards of care at a territorial level. The facilities involved in the DH organisational model produced different outcomes in terms of both efficiency and clinical outcomes. Where there is no direct management by the RH of healthcare staff, care pathways and operating theatres, replication of the standard is more difficult and outcomes are poorer. In the hospital where there is no need for emergency surgical activity and scheduling is concentrated within the week, better efficiency levels can be achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"96 2","pages":"221-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Performance of an Innovative Model for the Organisation of Specialised Hospital Activities throughout Italy: The \\\"Diffuse Hospital\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Morri, Cristiana Forni, Anselmo Campagna, Annella Mingazzini, Viola Damen, Manuela De Clerico, Elisa Carretta, Guglielmo Celli, Matteo Buccioli, Marika Tomasello, Gerardina Protupapa, Erik Boetto\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of an innovative model of hospital activity known \\\"Diffuse Hospital\\\" (DH) that involved 3 hospital wards/departments (A, B and C) located throughout Italy and the Reference Hospital (RH) that organised the construction of this model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An organisational retrospective observational study was conducted on the orthopaedic ward of each hospital from March 2022 to March 2023. Hospitals A, B and C had organisational differences in relation to the working relationship of healthcare professionals, the care pathways implemented, the presence or absence of an emergency department and the management of operating theatres. The primary indicator was the number of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) provided by the individual facilities. Additionally, a series of indicators were collected, and to enable comparison, these indicators were calculated in relation to the available resources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of DRGs provided by the DH was 3904, broken down into 1187 at Hospital A, 1851 at Hospital B and 866 at Hospital C. The RH comparison standard recorded 1603 DRGs. Hospital B showed higher DRG indicators of 39.7, 2.5 and 30.9 percentage points, respectively, than the RH. In relation to theatre activities and healthcare staff, Hospitals A and C revealed lower scores than the standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DH model may become a useful tool in healthcare policy strategies to enable national RHs to deliver treatments with high standards of care at a territorial level. The facilities involved in the DH organisational model produced different outcomes in terms of both efficiency and clinical outcomes. Where there is no direct management by the RH of healthcare staff, care pathways and operating theatres, replication of the standard is more difficult and outcomes are poorer. In the hospital where there is no need for emergency surgical activity and scheduling is concentrated within the week, better efficiency levels can be achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"96 2\",\"pages\":\"221-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3565\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估一种名为“扩散医院”(DH)的医院活动创新模式的性能,该模式涉及意大利各地的3个医院病房/部门(A、B和C)和组织构建该模式的参考医院(RH)。方法:于2022年3月至2023年3月对各医院骨科病房进行组织回顾性观察研究。A、B和C医院在保健专业人员的工作关系、实施的护理途径、是否存在急诊科和手术室管理方面存在组织差异。主要指标是各个机构提供的诊断相关组(drg)的数量。此外,还收集了一系列指标,为了便于比较,将这些指标与现有资源进行了计算。结果:卫生部提供的drg总数为3904份,其中A医院为1187份,B医院为1851份,c医院为866份,RH比较标准为1603份。B医院的DRG指标分别比RH高39.7、2.5和30.9个百分点。在剧院活动和医护人员方面,A医院和C医院的得分低于标准。结论:卫生保健模式可能成为医疗保健政策战略的有用工具,使国家卫生保健机构能够在地区一级提供高标准的护理治疗。卫生署组织模式所涉及的设施在效率和临床结果方面产生了不同的结果。在没有由RH直接管理医护人员、护理途径和手术室的地方,标准的复制更加困难,结果也更差。在不需要紧急手术活动且安排集中在一周内的医院,可以达到更好的效率水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Performance of an Innovative Model for the Organisation of Specialised Hospital Activities throughout Italy: The "Diffuse Hospital".

Aim: The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of an innovative model of hospital activity known "Diffuse Hospital" (DH) that involved 3 hospital wards/departments (A, B and C) located throughout Italy and the Reference Hospital (RH) that organised the construction of this model.

Methods: An organisational retrospective observational study was conducted on the orthopaedic ward of each hospital from March 2022 to March 2023. Hospitals A, B and C had organisational differences in relation to the working relationship of healthcare professionals, the care pathways implemented, the presence or absence of an emergency department and the management of operating theatres. The primary indicator was the number of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) provided by the individual facilities. Additionally, a series of indicators were collected, and to enable comparison, these indicators were calculated in relation to the available resources.

Results: The total number of DRGs provided by the DH was 3904, broken down into 1187 at Hospital A, 1851 at Hospital B and 866 at Hospital C. The RH comparison standard recorded 1603 DRGs. Hospital B showed higher DRG indicators of 39.7, 2.5 and 30.9 percentage points, respectively, than the RH. In relation to theatre activities and healthcare staff, Hospitals A and C revealed lower scores than the standard.

Conclusions: The DH model may become a useful tool in healthcare policy strategies to enable national RHs to deliver treatments with high standards of care at a territorial level. The facilities involved in the DH organisational model produced different outcomes in terms of both efficiency and clinical outcomes. Where there is no direct management by the RH of healthcare staff, care pathways and operating theatres, replication of the standard is more difficult and outcomes are poorer. In the hospital where there is no need for emergency surgical activity and scheduling is concentrated within the week, better efficiency levels can be achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信