Glasgow-Blatchford和Rockall评分在预测明显小肠出血患者的视频胶囊内窥镜检查结果方面的效用。

IF 2.2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Endoscopy International Open Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2452-1219
Raquel Ballester, James O'Connell, Conor Costigan, Shreyashee Sengupta, Thilagaraj Manoharan, Monserrat Martinez, Deirdre Mc Namara
{"title":"Glasgow-Blatchford和Rockall评分在预测明显小肠出血患者的视频胶囊内窥镜检查结果方面的效用。","authors":"Raquel Ballester, James O'Connell, Conor Costigan, Shreyashee Sengupta, Thilagaraj Manoharan, Monserrat Martinez, Deirdre Mc Namara","doi":"10.1055/a-2452-1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Glasgow-Blachford (GBS) and Rockall scores are recognized tools to prioritize patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Their utility in predicting findings on capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with overt small bowel bleeding (OSBB) remains unclear. The aim was to assess use of these scores in predicting relevant findings on CE and outcome among patients with suspected OSBB.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed from January 2019 to June 2022. Clinical parameters and scores were collected at presentation and at 24 hours. Univariate analysis used simple logistic regression, chi-squared test or Mann-Whitney as needed. ROC analysis was performed selecting the optimal cut-off point maximized by the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine patients were included, 62% of whom had relevant findings. The predictor showing the highest discrimination ability was the initial GBS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.76). The optimal cut-off point was at least 4, with sensitivity 98%, specificity 30%, and accuracy 72%. Multivariable regression analysis showed inpatient status on CE (odds ratio [OR] 117.27; 95% CI 11.32-4492.93; <i>P</i> = 0.001), shorter time to CE (OR 1.02; CI 1.01-1.04; <i>P</i> = 0.018), higher initial GBS (OR 1.22; CI 1.06-1.43; <i>P</i> = 0.009), and higher GBS within 24 hours (OR 1.19; CI 1.04-1.37; <i>P</i> = 0.013) were predictive factors for relevant findings on CE, with a model AUC 0.802, sensitivity 91.8%, and specificity 63.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBS and Rockall scores were useful in predicting relevant findings on CE in this cohort of patients with suspected OSBB. In patients with GBS 5 or higher, early CE during the same admission is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11671,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopy International Open","volume":"13 ","pages":"a24521219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall score utility in predicting findings on video capsule endoscopy in patients admitted with overt small bowel bleeding.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Ballester, James O'Connell, Conor Costigan, Shreyashee Sengupta, Thilagaraj Manoharan, Monserrat Martinez, Deirdre Mc Namara\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2452-1219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Glasgow-Blachford (GBS) and Rockall scores are recognized tools to prioritize patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Their utility in predicting findings on capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with overt small bowel bleeding (OSBB) remains unclear. The aim was to assess use of these scores in predicting relevant findings on CE and outcome among patients with suspected OSBB.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed from January 2019 to June 2022. Clinical parameters and scores were collected at presentation and at 24 hours. Univariate analysis used simple logistic regression, chi-squared test or Mann-Whitney as needed. ROC analysis was performed selecting the optimal cut-off point maximized by the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine patients were included, 62% of whom had relevant findings. The predictor showing the highest discrimination ability was the initial GBS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.76). The optimal cut-off point was at least 4, with sensitivity 98%, specificity 30%, and accuracy 72%. Multivariable regression analysis showed inpatient status on CE (odds ratio [OR] 117.27; 95% CI 11.32-4492.93; <i>P</i> = 0.001), shorter time to CE (OR 1.02; CI 1.01-1.04; <i>P</i> = 0.018), higher initial GBS (OR 1.22; CI 1.06-1.43; <i>P</i> = 0.009), and higher GBS within 24 hours (OR 1.19; CI 1.04-1.37; <i>P</i> = 0.013) were predictive factors for relevant findings on CE, with a model AUC 0.802, sensitivity 91.8%, and specificity 63.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GBS and Rockall scores were useful in predicting relevant findings on CE in this cohort of patients with suspected OSBB. In patients with GBS 5 or higher, early CE during the same admission is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"a24521219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopy International Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2452-1219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopy International Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2452-1219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与研究目的:Glasgow-Blachford (GBS)评分和Rockall评分是公认的上消化道出血患者优先排序的工具。它们在预测明显小肠出血(OSBB)患者胶囊内窥镜(CE)检查结果方面的应用尚不清楚。目的是评估这些评分在预测疑似OSBB患者CE相关发现和预后方面的应用。患者和方法:对2019年1月至2022年6月的患者进行回顾性分析。就诊时和24小时采集临床参数和评分。单因素分析采用简单逻辑回归、卡方检验或Mann-Whitney检验。选取优登指数最大化的最佳分界点进行ROC分析。结果:纳入79例患者,62%的患者有相关发现。显示最高判别能力的预测因子为初始GBS(曲线下面积[AUC] 0.625;95%可信区间[CI] 0.49-0.76)。最佳分界点至少为4,灵敏度98%,特异性30%,准确度72%。多变量回归分析显示CE住院情况(优势比[OR] 117.27;95% ci 11.32-4492.93;P = 0.001),到CE的时间较短(OR 1.02;可信区间1.01 - -1.04;P = 0.018),初始GBS较高(OR 1.22;可信区间1.06 - -1.43;P = 0.009),且24小时内GBS升高(OR 1.19;可信区间1.04 - -1.37;P = 0.013)为CE相关结果的预测因素,模型AUC为0.802,敏感性91.8%,特异性63.3%。结论:GBS和Rockall评分可用于预测该队列疑似OSBB患者的CE相关结果。在GBS 5或更高的患者中,在同一入院期间早期CE是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall score utility in predicting findings on video capsule endoscopy in patients admitted with overt small bowel bleeding.

Background and study aims: Glasgow-Blachford (GBS) and Rockall scores are recognized tools to prioritize patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Their utility in predicting findings on capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients with overt small bowel bleeding (OSBB) remains unclear. The aim was to assess use of these scores in predicting relevant findings on CE and outcome among patients with suspected OSBB.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed from January 2019 to June 2022. Clinical parameters and scores were collected at presentation and at 24 hours. Univariate analysis used simple logistic regression, chi-squared test or Mann-Whitney as needed. ROC analysis was performed selecting the optimal cut-off point maximized by the Youden index.

Results: Seventy-nine patients were included, 62% of whom had relevant findings. The predictor showing the highest discrimination ability was the initial GBS (area under the curve [AUC] 0.625; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.76). The optimal cut-off point was at least 4, with sensitivity 98%, specificity 30%, and accuracy 72%. Multivariable regression analysis showed inpatient status on CE (odds ratio [OR] 117.27; 95% CI 11.32-4492.93; P = 0.001), shorter time to CE (OR 1.02; CI 1.01-1.04; P = 0.018), higher initial GBS (OR 1.22; CI 1.06-1.43; P = 0.009), and higher GBS within 24 hours (OR 1.19; CI 1.04-1.37; P = 0.013) were predictive factors for relevant findings on CE, with a model AUC 0.802, sensitivity 91.8%, and specificity 63.3%.

Conclusions: GBS and Rockall scores were useful in predicting relevant findings on CE in this cohort of patients with suspected OSBB. In patients with GBS 5 or higher, early CE during the same admission is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopy International Open
Endoscopy International Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
3.80%
发文量
270
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信