急诊科护理复杂性因素与出院目的地:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2517
Andrea Urbina, Jordi Adamuz, Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-Udina, Judith Peñafiel-Muñoz, Virginia Munoa-Urruticoechea, Maribel González-Samartino, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Javier Jacob, Marta Romero-García
{"title":"急诊科护理复杂性因素与出院目的地:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Andrea Urbina, Jordi Adamuz, Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-Udina, Judith Peñafiel-Muñoz, Virginia Munoa-Urruticoechea, Maribel González-Samartino, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Javier Jacob, Marta Romero-García","doi":"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department discharge destination is an important topic in both clinical practice and management. This study aimed to analyze the association of Care Complexity Individual Factors (CCIFs) with discharge destinations in patients who visit the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study with consecutive sampling, including all patients who visited the ED of a tertiary hospital during 2021-2022. Data were collected from electronic health records. The main study outcomes were discharge destinations (mortality, intensive care unit admission, hospitalization, left without being seen/discharge against medical advice, and home discharge) and 26 CCIFs. Independent multinomial logistic regression was used for assessing the association of each factor and the discharge destinations, adjusted for age, sex, and triage level. All analyses were performed with R, version 4.3.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35,383 patients were included. Of these, 60.8% were home discharged, 34.1% were hospitalized, 2.6% were transferred to the intensive care unit, 2.1% were left without being seen, and 0.4% died. The presence of CCIFs was a risk factor of ED mortality (odds ratio (OR): 13.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.99;36.46]), intensive care unit admission (OR:1.26 [95%CI:1.08;1.47]), and hospitalization (OR: 1.62 [95%CI:1.53;1.71]), whilst the presence of care complexity factors was a protective factor of discharge against medical advice (OR:0.64 [95%CI:0.55;0.74]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The discharge destinations from the ED showed strong associations with the patient's complexity factors. Health professionals should consider these relationships for the design of early detection strategies and as an aid in decision-making, to ensure equity and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8146,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"e27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care Complexity Factors and Discharge Destination in an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Urbina, Jordi Adamuz, Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-Udina, Judith Peñafiel-Muñoz, Virginia Munoa-Urruticoechea, Maribel González-Samartino, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Javier Jacob, Marta Romero-García\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency department discharge destination is an important topic in both clinical practice and management. This study aimed to analyze the association of Care Complexity Individual Factors (CCIFs) with discharge destinations in patients who visit the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study with consecutive sampling, including all patients who visited the ED of a tertiary hospital during 2021-2022. Data were collected from electronic health records. The main study outcomes were discharge destinations (mortality, intensive care unit admission, hospitalization, left without being seen/discharge against medical advice, and home discharge) and 26 CCIFs. Independent multinomial logistic regression was used for assessing the association of each factor and the discharge destinations, adjusted for age, sex, and triage level. All analyses were performed with R, version 4.3.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35,383 patients were included. Of these, 60.8% were home discharged, 34.1% were hospitalized, 2.6% were transferred to the intensive care unit, 2.1% were left without being seen, and 0.4% died. The presence of CCIFs was a risk factor of ED mortality (odds ratio (OR): 13.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.99;36.46]), intensive care unit admission (OR:1.26 [95%CI:1.08;1.47]), and hospitalization (OR: 1.62 [95%CI:1.53;1.71]), whilst the presence of care complexity factors was a protective factor of discharge against medical advice (OR:0.64 [95%CI:0.55;0.74]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The discharge destinations from the ED showed strong associations with the patient's complexity factors. Health professionals should consider these relationships for the design of early detection strategies and as an aid in decision-making, to ensure equity and quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829229/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2517\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/aaemj.v13i1.2517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急诊科出院目的地是临床实践和管理中的一个重要课题。本研究旨在分析急诊科(ED)患者的护理复杂性个体因素(CCIFs)与出院目的地的关系。方法:这是一项连续抽样的回顾性队列研究,纳入了2021-2022年间在某三级医院急诊科就诊的所有患者。数据从电子健康记录中收集。主要研究结果为出院目的地(死亡率、重症监护病房入住情况、住院情况、未就诊出院/不遵医嘱出院以及在家出院)和26例cci。采用独立多项逻辑回归评估各因素与出院目的地的关联,并根据年龄、性别和分诊级别进行调整。所有分析均使用4.3.2版本的R进行。结果:共纳入35,383例患者。其中,出院60.8%,住院34.1%,转重症监护2.6%,留院2.1%,死亡0.4%。cci的存在是ED死亡率(优势比(OR): 13.49[95%可信区间(CI): 4.99;36.46])、重症监护病房入院(OR:1.26 [95%CI:1.08;1.47])和住院(OR: 1.62 [95%CI:1.53;1.71])的危险因素,而护理复杂性因素的存在是不听医嘱出院的保护因素(OR:0.64 [95%CI:0.55;0.74])。结论:急诊科的出院地点与患者的复杂性因素密切相关。卫生专业人员应在设计早期发现战略时考虑到这些关系,并作为决策的辅助,以确保公平和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Care Complexity Factors and Discharge Destination in an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Care Complexity Factors and Discharge Destination in an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Care Complexity Factors and Discharge Destination in an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Care Complexity Factors and Discharge Destination in an Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: Emergency department discharge destination is an important topic in both clinical practice and management. This study aimed to analyze the association of Care Complexity Individual Factors (CCIFs) with discharge destinations in patients who visit the emergency department (ED).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study with consecutive sampling, including all patients who visited the ED of a tertiary hospital during 2021-2022. Data were collected from electronic health records. The main study outcomes were discharge destinations (mortality, intensive care unit admission, hospitalization, left without being seen/discharge against medical advice, and home discharge) and 26 CCIFs. Independent multinomial logistic regression was used for assessing the association of each factor and the discharge destinations, adjusted for age, sex, and triage level. All analyses were performed with R, version 4.3.2.

Results: A total of 35,383 patients were included. Of these, 60.8% were home discharged, 34.1% were hospitalized, 2.6% were transferred to the intensive care unit, 2.1% were left without being seen, and 0.4% died. The presence of CCIFs was a risk factor of ED mortality (odds ratio (OR): 13.49 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.99;36.46]), intensive care unit admission (OR:1.26 [95%CI:1.08;1.47]), and hospitalization (OR: 1.62 [95%CI:1.53;1.71]), whilst the presence of care complexity factors was a protective factor of discharge against medical advice (OR:0.64 [95%CI:0.55;0.74]).

Conclusion: The discharge destinations from the ED showed strong associations with the patient's complexity factors. Health professionals should consider these relationships for the design of early detection strategies and as an aid in decision-making, to ensure equity and quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine
Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信