澳大利亚胸部癌症运动服务:一项定点患病率调查。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Amy Bowman, Linda Denehy, Lara Edbrooke
{"title":"澳大利亚胸部癌症运动服务:一项定点患病率调查。","authors":"Amy Bowman,&nbsp;Linda Denehy,&nbsp;Lara Edbrooke","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer guidelines recommend pre- and rehabilitation; however, current research shows these services are not well integrated into clinical practice. To date, there has been no prospective audit of Australian lung cancer exercise services or the people accessing these services. The aim of this study was to describe the exercise pre- and rehabilitation services available to people with thoracic cancer and the characteristics of people with thoracic cancer attending these services in Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective, observational, multicenter, 5-day, point-prevalence study. Australian healthcare services likely to provide exercise services to people with thoracic cancer were contacted to participate. Conduct and reporting followed the CROSS guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 397 services were contacted, and 203 responded (51%). Overall, 67% (<i>n</i> = 137) accepted thoracic cancer referrals, and 107 (78%) completed the survey. Most exercise services were targeted at respiratory disease (58%, <i>n</i> = 60) compared with 31% cancer-specific (<i>n</i> = 33) and 5% lung cancer-specific (<i>n</i> = 5). A total of 73 patients with thoracic cancer attended programs across 41 sites (38%). Mean (SD) age was 68.5 (9.7) years. Overall, 4% of patients (<i>n</i> = 3) were culturally and linguistically diverse, and none identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. A total of 19 outcomes were used in 51 combinations to assess participants (<i>n</i> = 70), and 12 exercise interventions were delivered in 45 combinations (<i>n</i> = 67).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>One-third of responding exercise programs did not offer exercise services to people with thoracic cancer. Almost two-thirds of services that accept referrals did not have a thoracic cancer patient attend their service. High heterogeneity in outcome measures and exercise interventions was observed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"21 3","pages":"328-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic Cancer Exercise Services in Australia: A Point-Prevalence Survey\",\"authors\":\"Amy Bowman,&nbsp;Linda Denehy,&nbsp;Lara Edbrooke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajco.14157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cancer guidelines recommend pre- and rehabilitation; however, current research shows these services are not well integrated into clinical practice. To date, there has been no prospective audit of Australian lung cancer exercise services or the people accessing these services. The aim of this study was to describe the exercise pre- and rehabilitation services available to people with thoracic cancer and the characteristics of people with thoracic cancer attending these services in Australia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Prospective, observational, multicenter, 5-day, point-prevalence study. Australian healthcare services likely to provide exercise services to people with thoracic cancer were contacted to participate. Conduct and reporting followed the CROSS guidelines.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 397 services were contacted, and 203 responded (51%). Overall, 67% (<i>n</i> = 137) accepted thoracic cancer referrals, and 107 (78%) completed the survey. Most exercise services were targeted at respiratory disease (58%, <i>n</i> = 60) compared with 31% cancer-specific (<i>n</i> = 33) and 5% lung cancer-specific (<i>n</i> = 5). A total of 73 patients with thoracic cancer attended programs across 41 sites (38%). Mean (SD) age was 68.5 (9.7) years. Overall, 4% of patients (<i>n</i> = 3) were culturally and linguistically diverse, and none identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. A total of 19 outcomes were used in 51 combinations to assess participants (<i>n</i> = 70), and 12 exercise interventions were delivered in 45 combinations (<i>n</i> = 67).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>One-third of responding exercise programs did not offer exercise services to people with thoracic cancer. Almost two-thirds of services that accept referrals did not have a thoracic cancer patient attend their service. High heterogeneity in outcome measures and exercise interventions was observed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"328-337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14157\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14157\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症指南推荐术前和康复;然而,目前的研究表明,这些服务并没有很好地融入临床实践。到目前为止,还没有对澳大利亚肺癌运动服务或使用这些服务的人进行前瞻性审计。本研究的目的是描述澳大利亚胸癌患者可获得的运动前和康复服务,以及参加这些服务的胸癌患者的特征。方法:前瞻性、观察性、多中心、5天、点流行研究。研究人员联系了可能为胸癌患者提供运动服务的澳大利亚医疗保健服务机构。行为和报告遵循CROSS准则。结果:共联系服务397家,回复203家(51%)。总体而言,67% (n = 137)接受了胸部癌症转诊,107(78%)完成了调查。大多数运动服务针对呼吸系统疾病(58%,n = 60), 31%针对癌症(n = 33), 5%针对肺癌(n = 5)。共有73名胸廓癌患者参加了41个地点的项目(38%)。平均(SD)年龄为68.5(9.7)岁。总体而言,4%的患者(n = 3)在文化和语言上是不同的,没有人被确定为土著或托雷斯海峡岛民。总共使用51种组合中的19种结果来评估参与者(n = 70),并在45种组合中提供12种运动干预措施(n = 67)。结论:三分之一的运动项目没有为胸癌患者提供运动服务。在接受转诊的服务机构中,几乎有三分之二没有胸部癌症患者参加过他们的服务。观察到结果测量和运动干预的高度异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Thoracic Cancer Exercise Services in Australia: A Point-Prevalence Survey

Thoracic Cancer Exercise Services in Australia: A Point-Prevalence Survey

Background

Cancer guidelines recommend pre- and rehabilitation; however, current research shows these services are not well integrated into clinical practice. To date, there has been no prospective audit of Australian lung cancer exercise services or the people accessing these services. The aim of this study was to describe the exercise pre- and rehabilitation services available to people with thoracic cancer and the characteristics of people with thoracic cancer attending these services in Australia.

Methods

Prospective, observational, multicenter, 5-day, point-prevalence study. Australian healthcare services likely to provide exercise services to people with thoracic cancer were contacted to participate. Conduct and reporting followed the CROSS guidelines.

Results

A total of 397 services were contacted, and 203 responded (51%). Overall, 67% (n = 137) accepted thoracic cancer referrals, and 107 (78%) completed the survey. Most exercise services were targeted at respiratory disease (58%, n = 60) compared with 31% cancer-specific (n = 33) and 5% lung cancer-specific (n = 5). A total of 73 patients with thoracic cancer attended programs across 41 sites (38%). Mean (SD) age was 68.5 (9.7) years. Overall, 4% of patients (n = 3) were culturally and linguistically diverse, and none identified as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander. A total of 19 outcomes were used in 51 combinations to assess participants (n = 70), and 12 exercise interventions were delivered in 45 combinations (n = 67).

Conclusions

One-third of responding exercise programs did not offer exercise services to people with thoracic cancer. Almost two-thirds of services that accept referrals did not have a thoracic cancer patient attend their service. High heterogeneity in outcome measures and exercise interventions was observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信