锥形束ct无牙嵴尺寸预测种植体尺寸准确性的回顾性研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.4103/ams.ams_101_24
Hunter R Jolicoeur, Gerard A Camargo, Tamara G Stephenson, Wenjian Zhang
{"title":"锥形束ct无牙嵴尺寸预测种植体尺寸准确性的回顾性研究。","authors":"Hunter R Jolicoeur, Gerard A Camargo, Tamara G Stephenson, Wenjian Zhang","doi":"10.4103/ams.ams_101_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the recommended imaging modality for implant planning. It is important to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT-based implant size prediction. This study aims to correlate projected implant sizes from CBCT alveolar ridge measurements with the actual sizes of placed implants, to determine the accuracy of the prediction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CBCTs taken for implant placement were included. The heights and widths of edentulous ridges were measured with Anatomage <i>in vivo</i> dental three-dimensional software, and actual implant size data were retrieved from treatment notes. Central incisor, canine, first premolar and first molar locations were analysed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run to determine the average sizes for edentulous ridges and implants and Pearson correlation was conducted to determine the accuracy of CBCT-based implant size prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 544 cases analysed, the average implant diameter was 4.17 mm (standard deviation [SD] =0.38) and the length was 10.05 mm (SD =1.17). Alveolar width and height were 3.74 mm and 4.31 mm larger than the implant diameters and lengths, respectively providing approximately 1.5-2 mm of extra space on either side of the implant in relation to adjacent anatomical structures. Implants placed at mandibular canine and first molar and maxillary first premolar demonstrated significant correlations with the sizes of the edentulous ridges (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CBCT-based alveolar ridge measurements have been demonstrated as reliable parameters to predict implant sizes. However, its accuracy may be limited by the factors such as edentulous ridge morphology and proximity to vital anatomic landmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7972,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":"187-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of Implant Size Prediction Based on Edentulous Ridge Dimension on Cone-beam Computed Tomography - A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hunter R Jolicoeur, Gerard A Camargo, Tamara G Stephenson, Wenjian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ams.ams_101_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the recommended imaging modality for implant planning. It is important to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT-based implant size prediction. This study aims to correlate projected implant sizes from CBCT alveolar ridge measurements with the actual sizes of placed implants, to determine the accuracy of the prediction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>CBCTs taken for implant placement were included. The heights and widths of edentulous ridges were measured with Anatomage <i>in vivo</i> dental three-dimensional software, and actual implant size data were retrieved from treatment notes. Central incisor, canine, first premolar and first molar locations were analysed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run to determine the average sizes for edentulous ridges and implants and Pearson correlation was conducted to determine the accuracy of CBCT-based implant size prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 544 cases analysed, the average implant diameter was 4.17 mm (standard deviation [SD] =0.38) and the length was 10.05 mm (SD =1.17). Alveolar width and height were 3.74 mm and 4.31 mm larger than the implant diameters and lengths, respectively providing approximately 1.5-2 mm of extra space on either side of the implant in relation to adjacent anatomical structures. Implants placed at mandibular canine and first molar and maxillary first premolar demonstrated significant correlations with the sizes of the edentulous ridges (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CBCT-based alveolar ridge measurements have been demonstrated as reliable parameters to predict implant sizes. However, its accuracy may be limited by the factors such as edentulous ridge morphology and proximity to vital anatomic landmarks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"187-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11828063/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_101_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_101_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)是推荐的种植计划成像方式。评估基于cbct的种植体尺寸预测的准确性是非常重要的。本研究旨在将CBCT牙槽嵴测量的预测种植体尺寸与放置种植体的实际尺寸相关联,以确定预测的准确性。材料和方法:纳入种植体放置时的cbct。无牙牙脊的高度和宽度用Anatomage体内三维牙科软件测量,实际种植体尺寸数据从治疗记录中检索。分析了中切牙、犬齿、第一前磨牙和第一磨牙的位置。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)确定无牙牙脊和种植体的平均尺寸,并采用Pearson相关分析确定基于cbct的种植体尺寸预测的准确性。结果:544例患者中,种植体平均直径4.17 mm(标准差[SD] =0.38),种植体平均长度10.05 mm (SD =1.17)。牙槽宽度和高度分别比种植体直径和长度大3.74 mm和4.31 mm,在种植体两侧相对于邻近解剖结构提供约1.5-2 mm的额外空间。种植体放置在下颌犬齿、第一磨牙和上颌第一前磨牙与无牙脊的大小有显著相关性(P < 0.05)。讨论:基于cbct的牙槽嵴测量已被证明是预测种植体尺寸的可靠参数。然而,其准确性可能受到诸如无牙嵴形态和接近重要解剖标志等因素的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accuracy of Implant Size Prediction Based on Edentulous Ridge Dimension on Cone-beam Computed Tomography - A Retrospective Study.

Accuracy of Implant Size Prediction Based on Edentulous Ridge Dimension on Cone-beam Computed Tomography - A Retrospective Study.

Accuracy of Implant Size Prediction Based on Edentulous Ridge Dimension on Cone-beam Computed Tomography - A Retrospective Study.

Accuracy of Implant Size Prediction Based on Edentulous Ridge Dimension on Cone-beam Computed Tomography - A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the recommended imaging modality for implant planning. It is important to evaluate the accuracy of CBCT-based implant size prediction. This study aims to correlate projected implant sizes from CBCT alveolar ridge measurements with the actual sizes of placed implants, to determine the accuracy of the prediction.

Materials and methods: CBCTs taken for implant placement were included. The heights and widths of edentulous ridges were measured with Anatomage in vivo dental three-dimensional software, and actual implant size data were retrieved from treatment notes. Central incisor, canine, first premolar and first molar locations were analysed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was run to determine the average sizes for edentulous ridges and implants and Pearson correlation was conducted to determine the accuracy of CBCT-based implant size prediction.

Results: Of 544 cases analysed, the average implant diameter was 4.17 mm (standard deviation [SD] =0.38) and the length was 10.05 mm (SD =1.17). Alveolar width and height were 3.74 mm and 4.31 mm larger than the implant diameters and lengths, respectively providing approximately 1.5-2 mm of extra space on either side of the implant in relation to adjacent anatomical structures. Implants placed at mandibular canine and first molar and maxillary first premolar demonstrated significant correlations with the sizes of the edentulous ridges (P < 0.05).

Discussion: CBCT-based alveolar ridge measurements have been demonstrated as reliable parameters to predict implant sizes. However, its accuracy may be limited by the factors such as edentulous ridge morphology and proximity to vital anatomic landmarks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信