人类周围神经组织蛋白质提取方案的改进。

IF 4.3 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ACS Omega Pub Date : 2025-02-02 eCollection Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1021/acsomega.4c11373
Drifa Frostadottir, Charlotte Welinder, Raquel Perez, Lars B Dahlin
{"title":"人类周围神经组织蛋白质提取方案的改进。","authors":"Drifa Frostadottir, Charlotte Welinder, Raquel Perez, Lars B Dahlin","doi":"10.1021/acsomega.4c11373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our aim was to establish an effective method for protein extraction from freshly frozen human peripheral nerves, determine the minimum amount required for consistent protein extraction outcomes, and assess which method produced the highest number of protein identities. Five extraction methods were compared using 8 M urea and Ripa buffer using either the Bullet Blender or Bioruptor. Out of the total 2619 identified proteins, protein extraction using the Ripa buffer combined with either Bioruptor or Bullet Blender resulted in the identification of 1582 (60%) and 1615 (62%) proteins, respectively. In contrast, using 8 M urea and Bioruptor for protein extraction resulted in 1022 proteins (39%), whereas employing Bullet Blender yielded 1446 proteins (55%). Sample amounts, ranging from 0.6 to 10 mg, were prepared with consistent protein extraction outcome obtained for samples ≥1.2 mg. Combining Ripa and 8 M urea with Bullet Blender increased protein identification to 2126 (81%). Proteins were classified by their cell components, molecular functions, and biological processes. Furthermore, a subclassification of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM) was introduced. We recommend the use of Ripa buffer, in combination with 8 M urea and Bullet Blender for extracting proteins from fresh-frozen human nerves weighing ≥1.2 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":22,"journal":{"name":"ACS Omega","volume":"10 5","pages":"5111-5118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refinement of Protein Extraction Protocols for Human Peripheral Nerve Tissue.\",\"authors\":\"Drifa Frostadottir, Charlotte Welinder, Raquel Perez, Lars B Dahlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsomega.4c11373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our aim was to establish an effective method for protein extraction from freshly frozen human peripheral nerves, determine the minimum amount required for consistent protein extraction outcomes, and assess which method produced the highest number of protein identities. Five extraction methods were compared using 8 M urea and Ripa buffer using either the Bullet Blender or Bioruptor. Out of the total 2619 identified proteins, protein extraction using the Ripa buffer combined with either Bioruptor or Bullet Blender resulted in the identification of 1582 (60%) and 1615 (62%) proteins, respectively. In contrast, using 8 M urea and Bioruptor for protein extraction resulted in 1022 proteins (39%), whereas employing Bullet Blender yielded 1446 proteins (55%). Sample amounts, ranging from 0.6 to 10 mg, were prepared with consistent protein extraction outcome obtained for samples ≥1.2 mg. Combining Ripa and 8 M urea with Bullet Blender increased protein identification to 2126 (81%). Proteins were classified by their cell components, molecular functions, and biological processes. Furthermore, a subclassification of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM) was introduced. We recommend the use of Ripa buffer, in combination with 8 M urea and Bullet Blender for extracting proteins from fresh-frozen human nerves weighing ≥1.2 mg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Omega\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"5111-5118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Omega\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c11373\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Omega","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c11373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是建立一种从新鲜冷冻的人类周围神经中提取蛋白质的有效方法,确定蛋白质提取结果一致所需的最小量,并评估哪种方法产生最多的蛋白质身份。使用Bullet Blender或Bioruptor对8 M尿素和Ripa缓冲液的5种提取方法进行了比较。在总共鉴定的2619种蛋白质中,使用Ripa缓冲液结合Bioruptor或Bullet Blender进行蛋白质提取,分别鉴定了1582种(60%)和1615种(62%)蛋白质。相比之下,使用8 M尿素和Bioruptor进行蛋白质提取,得到1022个蛋白质(39%),而使用Bullet Blender得到1446个蛋白质(55%)。样品量为0.6 ~ 10mg,对于≥1.2 mg的样品,获得一致的蛋白质提取结果。将Ripa和8 M尿素与Bullet Blender结合,蛋白质鉴定率提高到2126(81%)。蛋白质按其细胞成分、分子功能和生物过程分类。此外,还介绍了参与细胞外基质(ECM)的蛋白质亚分类。我们推荐使用Ripa缓冲液,结合8 M尿素和Bullet Blender从新鲜冷冻的人类神经中提取蛋白质,重量≥1.2 mg。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Refinement of Protein Extraction Protocols for Human Peripheral Nerve Tissue.

Refinement of Protein Extraction Protocols for Human Peripheral Nerve Tissue.

Refinement of Protein Extraction Protocols for Human Peripheral Nerve Tissue.

Refinement of Protein Extraction Protocols for Human Peripheral Nerve Tissue.

Our aim was to establish an effective method for protein extraction from freshly frozen human peripheral nerves, determine the minimum amount required for consistent protein extraction outcomes, and assess which method produced the highest number of protein identities. Five extraction methods were compared using 8 M urea and Ripa buffer using either the Bullet Blender or Bioruptor. Out of the total 2619 identified proteins, protein extraction using the Ripa buffer combined with either Bioruptor or Bullet Blender resulted in the identification of 1582 (60%) and 1615 (62%) proteins, respectively. In contrast, using 8 M urea and Bioruptor for protein extraction resulted in 1022 proteins (39%), whereas employing Bullet Blender yielded 1446 proteins (55%). Sample amounts, ranging from 0.6 to 10 mg, were prepared with consistent protein extraction outcome obtained for samples ≥1.2 mg. Combining Ripa and 8 M urea with Bullet Blender increased protein identification to 2126 (81%). Proteins were classified by their cell components, molecular functions, and biological processes. Furthermore, a subclassification of proteins involved in the extracellular matrix (ECM) was introduced. We recommend the use of Ripa buffer, in combination with 8 M urea and Bullet Blender for extracting proteins from fresh-frozen human nerves weighing ≥1.2 mg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Omega
ACS Omega Chemical Engineering-General Chemical Engineering
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
3945
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信