简单的阅读…简单的英语…简单的语言?澳大利亚“容易”信息生产中的决策

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Ariella Meltzer, Emma Barnes, Ayah Wehbe
{"title":"简单的阅读…简单的英语…简单的语言?澳大利亚“容易”信息生产中的决策","authors":"Ariella Meltzer,&nbsp;Emma Barnes,&nbsp;Ayah Wehbe","doi":"10.1111/jar.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In Australia, several formats of written information are made for people with intellectual disability and/or low literacy, such as Easy Read, Easy English and Plain Language. More understanding is however required about the decision-making behind their features, as it is not always clear which formats use which features or for what reasons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with leaders/senior staff in Australian accessible information provider organisations who make ‘easy’ information. Data were thematically-analysed, via a two-stage deductive-inductive process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results show overlaps between different ‘easy’ information formats in Australia. ‘Easy’ information provider organisations make choices about what reading-level and images to use based <i>how</i> they see their envisioned audience <i>using</i> the information and <i>what</i> will make their envisioned audience feel <i>recognised/empowered</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>No single ‘easy’ format will suit everyone. ‘Easy’ information providers need to be more specific about the audience and associated features of their products.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Ariella Meltzer,&nbsp;Emma Barnes,&nbsp;Ayah Wehbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In Australia, several formats of written information are made for people with intellectual disability and/or low literacy, such as Easy Read, Easy English and Plain Language. More understanding is however required about the decision-making behind their features, as it is not always clear which formats use which features or for what reasons.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with leaders/senior staff in Australian accessible information provider organisations who make ‘easy’ information. Data were thematically-analysed, via a two-stage deductive-inductive process.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results show overlaps between different ‘easy’ information formats in Australia. ‘Easy’ information provider organisations make choices about what reading-level and images to use based <i>how</i> they see their envisioned audience <i>using</i> the information and <i>what</i> will make their envisioned audience feel <i>recognised/empowered</i>.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>No single ‘easy’ format will suit everyone. ‘Easy’ information providers need to be more specific about the audience and associated features of their products.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70021\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70021\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在澳大利亚,为智障人士和/或识字率低的人制作了几种书面信息格式,如易读、易英语和通俗语言。然而,需要更多地了解其功能背后的决策,因为并不总是清楚哪些格式使用哪些功能或出于什么原因。方法对澳大利亚无障碍信息提供者组织的领导/高级员工进行了12次半结构化访谈,这些组织提供了“容易”的信息。通过两个阶段的演绎-归纳过程,对数据进行了主题分析。结果显示,在澳大利亚,不同的“简单”信息格式之间存在重叠。“容易”的信息提供者组织根据他们所看到的预期受众使用信息的方式,以及什么会让他们的预期受众感到被认可/被授权,来选择使用什么阅读水平和图像。没有一种“简单”的格式适合所有人。“简单”的信息提供者需要更具体地说明其产品的受众和相关功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia

Easy Read… Easy English… Plain Language? Decision-Making in the Production of ‘Easy’ Information in Australia

Background

In Australia, several formats of written information are made for people with intellectual disability and/or low literacy, such as Easy Read, Easy English and Plain Language. More understanding is however required about the decision-making behind their features, as it is not always clear which formats use which features or for what reasons.

Method

Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with leaders/senior staff in Australian accessible information provider organisations who make ‘easy’ information. Data were thematically-analysed, via a two-stage deductive-inductive process.

Results

The results show overlaps between different ‘easy’ information formats in Australia. ‘Easy’ information provider organisations make choices about what reading-level and images to use based how they see their envisioned audience using the information and what will make their envisioned audience feel recognised/empowered.

Conclusions

No single ‘easy’ format will suit everyone. ‘Easy’ information providers need to be more specific about the audience and associated features of their products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信